Q.The deuteron is bound by nuclear forces just as H-atom is made up of p and e bound by electrostatic forces. If we consider the force between neutron and proton in deuteron as given in the form of a Coulomb potential but with an effective charge e′: F=4πε01re′2, estimate the value of (e′/e) given that the binding energy of a deuteron is 2.2 MeV.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Rutherford Scattering Distance
Rutherford Scattering Distance – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you are firing a tiny, fast bullet at a large, heavy cannonball hidden inside a big cloud of cotton. Most bullets zip right through the cotton, barely slowing down. But a few bullets come very close to the cannonball itself. Those bullets get deflected sharply, sometimes even bouncing back.
The Rutherford scattering distance is the answer to this question: How close did that bullet get to the cannonball before it turned around?
In the real experiment, the "bullet" is an alpha particle (a helium nucleus, positively charged), the "cannonball" is the gold nucleus (also positively charged, and very heavy), and the "cotton" is the mostly empty space inside the gold atom. The alpha particle and the gold nucleus repel each other because both are positive. The closer the alpha particle gets, the stronger the repulsion.
The Intuitive Picture
Think of a ball rolling up a steep hill. The ball starts with some speed (kinetic energy). As it climbs, it slows down because gravity is pulling it back. At the very top of its climb, it stops for an instant — all its kinetic energy has been converted into gravitational potential energy. Then it rolls back down.
The alpha particle does the same thing, but with electric repulsion instead of gravity. It approaches the nucleus, slows down, stops at the closest possible point, and then flies back the way it came.
That closest point — the distance of closest approach — is the Rutherford scattering distance. It is the distance at which the alpha particle's initial kinetic energy is completely converted into electrostatic potential energy.
This distance is not the radius of the nucleus. It is the distance at which the alpha particle would just touch the nucleus if the nucleus were a point charge. In reality, the alpha particle never actually reaches the nucleus — it turns around before that.
The Precise Statement
Let an alpha particle with charge +2e and mass m approach a gold nucleus with charge +Ze (where Z=79 for gold). The alpha particle starts from very far away with initial kinetic energy K=21mv2.
At the distance of closest approach, call it r0, the alpha particle's speed becomes zero. All its kinetic energy has become electrostatic potential energy:
K=4πε01⋅r0(2e)(Ze)
Solving for r0:
r0=4πε01⋅K2Ze2
This is the Rutherford scattering distance (also called the distance of closest approach in a head-on collision).
What It Tells Us
- If the alpha particle hits the nucleus head-on, it comes exactly this close before reversing direction.
- If it misses slightly, it comes closer than r0? No — it comes less close. The head-on collision gives the minimum possible distance of closest approach for a given initial energy. Any sideways motion means the particle never gets as close.
- If the initial kinetic energy is larger, r0 becomes smaller — the alpha particle can punch closer to the nucleus before being stopped. …
Why this formula?
Rutherford Scattering: Why the Distance of Closest Approach Formula Works
The distance of closest approach — often denoted d0 or r0 — is the minimum separation between an alpha particle and the nucleus in a head-on collision. It's a beautiful example of energy conservation doing all the heavy lifting.
The Physical Picture
Imagine an alpha particle (charge +2e) fired straight at a gold nucleus (charge +Ze). As it approaches, the Coulomb repulsion slows it down. At the point of closest approach, the alpha particle's radial velocity becomes zero — it stops moving toward the nucleus, and is about to turn around and fly back.
At that instant, all the kinetic energy it had at infinity has been converted into electrostatic potential energy. No other forces are at play (gravity is negligible, and we're far from the nuclear force range).
The Derivation in One Step
Let the alpha particle have initial kinetic energy K=21mv2 at a large distance (where potential energy is zero). At the distance of closest approach r0, its speed is zero, so kinetic energy is zero. Energy conservation gives:
21mv2=4πϵ01⋅r0(2e)(Ze)
r0=4πϵ01⋅K2Ze2
That's it. The formula is a direct consequence of energy conservation in a pure Coulomb field.
Why This Makes Physical Sense
- Higher kinetic energy → the alpha particle can push closer before being stopped → r0 is smaller.
- Higher nuclear charge Z → stronger repulsion → the alpha stops farther away → r0 is larger.
- The factor 2Ze2 comes from the product of charges: (2e)(Ze)=2Ze2.
This is the head-on distance. For non-head-on collisions (nonzero impact parameter), the distance of closest approach is larger because some energy remains in the perpendicular component of motion. The general formula involves the impact parameter b and scattering angle θ, but the head-on case gives the absolute minimum possible approach.
A Common Misconception …
Treat the neutron-proton pair like a hydrogen-like (Bohr) bound state, but with the electron charge e replaced by an effective charge e′ and the electron mass replaced by the reduced mass of the two nucleons.
Bohr scaling: the ground-state binding energy of a hydrogen-like system is E∝μ(charge)4, where μ is the reduced mass.
Reduced mass of the deuteron: μ=mp+mnmpmn≈2mp=21836me=918me.
Scale from hydrogen (EH=13.6 eV, electron mass me, charge e): …
Modelling the deuteron as a hydrogen-like bound state with effective charge e′ and reduced mass μ=mp/2=918me gives ee′≈3.6.
The analogy
In the hydrogen atom an electron (mass me, charge e) is Coulomb-bound to the proton with ground-state binding energy EH=13.6 eV. The stem tells us to treat the neutron-proton force in the deuteron as a Coulomb-type interaction with an effective charge e′. So the deuteron is a hydrogen-like system with two changes: the charge e→e′, and the light electron mass is replaced by the reduced mass of the two heavy nucleons.
Step 1 — Bohr energy scaling
For any hydrogen-like bound state the ground-state energy is
E=21μc2α2,α=4πε0ℏc(charge)2,
so E∝μ(charge)4, where μ is the reduced mass of the bound pair.
Step 2 — Reduced mass of the deuteron
The neutron and proton have nearly equal masses ≈mp, so
μ=mp+mnmpmn≈2mp=21836me=918me.
Step 3 — Scale the binding energy
Replacing me→μ and e→e′, …
Method: Scaling a Bound-State Energy Between Two "Hydrogen-Like" Systems (Bohr-Model Scaling)
This method applies whenever a problem asks you to model an unfamiliar two-body bound system (here, the deuteron) as if it were a hydrogen-like atom with a different charge and/or different constituent masses, and to find an unknown parameter (like an effective charge) by matching binding energies.
Steps
Step 1: Recognise the two-body Coulomb-bound-state analogy
Any two particles held together purely by an inverse-square attractive force behave like a hydrogen-like atom. The Bohr-model ground-state binding energy for such a system depends only on the reduced mass of the pair and the fourth power of the interaction charge:
E∝μ(charge)4
Step 2: Compute the reduced mass of the actual bound system
For two particles of mass m1 and m2, the reduced mass is
μ=m1+m2m1m2
Use the real masses of the particles in the problem (here, the neutron and proton) — not the electron mass used in ordinary hydrogen.
Step 3: Set up the scaling ratio against the known hydrogen-atom result
Since you know hydrogen's own ground-state binding energy EH=13.6 eV (mass me, charge e), write the ratio of the new system's energy to hydrogen's:
EHEnew=(meμnew)(echargenew)4 …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.The distance of closest approach when an alpha particle of kinetic energy 6.5 MeV strikes a nucleus of atomic number 50 is (A) 0.221 fm (B) 1.101 fm (C) 0.0221 fm (D) 4.42 fm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The distance of closest approach is found by equating the initial kinetic energy to the electrostatic potential energy at the turning point. For a 6.5 MeV alpha particle and a nucleus with Z=50, the result is about 22 fm, which corresponds to option (C) 0.0221 pm (since 1 pm = 1000 fm, 22 fm = 0.022 pm).
Concept & Intuition
When an alpha particle (charge 2e) is fired head-on toward a heavy nucleus (charge Ze), it slows down as it climbs the Coulomb potential hill. At the point of closest approach, its kinetic energy has been completely converted into electrostatic potential energy — it momentarily stops before being repelled back. This is a pure energy conservation problem:
Kinitial=4πε01rmin(2e)(Ze)
Solving for rmin gives the distance of closest approach. The trick is to use consistent units — nuclear physicists often work in MeV and femtometers, using the handy constant e2/(4πε0)≈1.44 MeV⋅fm.
Step-by-step solution
- Write the energy conservation equation At the turning point, all kinetic energy K becomes Coulomb potential energy:
K=4πε01rmin(2e)(Ze)
Here Z=50 (atomic number of the target nucleus), and the alpha particle has charge 2e.
- Solve for rmin
rmin=4πε01K2Ze2
- Use the convenient constant The product 4πε0e2≈1.44 MeV⋅fm. So:
rmin=K2Z×1.44 MeV⋅fm
- Plug in numbers Z=50, K=6.5 MeV:
rmin=6.52×50×1.44 fm
rmin=6.5144 fm≈22.15 fm
-
Convert to the units used in the options
The options are given in fm (femtometers) but note that (C) is 0.0221 fm — that’s suspiciously small. Actually, check: 22.15 fm = 22.15×10−15 m. But 1 picometer (pm) = 10−12 m = 1000 fm. So 22.15 fm = 0.02215 pm. The options list (C) as 0.0221 fm — but that would be 0.0221 fm, which is 1000 times smaller. Wait — let’s re-read the options carefully:
(A) 0.221 fm
(B) 1.101 fm
(C) 0.0221 fm
(D) 4.42 fm …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.The closest approach of an alpha particle when it make a head on collision with a gold nucleus is 10×10−14 m, then the kinetic energy of the alpha particle is : (A) 3640 J (B) 3.64 J (C) 3.64×10−16 J (D) 3.64×10−13 J
›Reveal solutionSolution
The kinetic energy of the alpha particle equals the electrostatic potential energy at the distance of closest approach. Using Coulomb’s law, the energy is found to be about 3.64×10−13J, which corresponds to option (D).
Concept and intuition:
When an alpha particle (charge +2e) is fired head-on at a gold nucleus (charge +79e), it slows down as it approaches because of the repulsive electrostatic force. At the point of closest approach, its speed becomes zero — all its initial kinetic energy has been converted into electrostatic potential energy. So we can equate the kinetic energy K to the potential energy U at that distance r:
K=4πε01r(2e)(79e)
This is a direct application of energy conservation in a purely electrostatic field.
Step-by-step solution:
-
Identify the charges and constants
Alpha particle charge: q1=2e=2×1.6×10−19C
Gold nucleus charge: q2=79e=79×1.6×10−19C
Distance of closest approach: r=10×10−14m=10−13m
Coulomb constant: k=4πε01=9×109N⋅m2/C2
-
Write the potential energy formula
U=krq1q2
- Substitute the values
U=(9×109)⋅10−13(2×1.6×10−19)⋅(79×1.6×10−19)
- Simplify step by step First, compute the product of charges:
(2×1.6×10−19)×(79×1.6×10−19)=2×79×(1.6)2×10−38
2×79=158 and (1.6)2=2.56, so:
158×2.56=404.48
Thus numerator = 404.48×10−38C2
Now divide by r=10−13m:
10−13404.48×10−38=404.48×10−25… -
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.In the head-on collision of two alpha particles α1 and α2 with the gold nucleus, the closest approaches are 31.4 fermi and 94.2 fermi respectively. Then the ratio of the energy possessed by the alpha particles α2/α1 is: (A) 1:3 (B) 9:1 (C) 3:1 (D) 1:9
›Reveal solutionSolution
At closest approach kinetic energy converts fully to Coulomb potential, so r∝1/E; the larger closest approach means smaller energy, giving Eα2:Eα1=1:3.
At the distance of closest approach r, all kinetic energy E becomes electrostatic potential energy:
E=4πε01rqαqAu⟹r∝E1. …
- KCET 2022Set B-31 markMCQQ.In accordance with the Bohr’s model, the quantum number that characterizes the Earth’s revolution around the sun in an orbit of radius 1.5×1011m with orbital speed 3×104 ms−1 is [given mass of Earth=6×1024kg] (A) 8.57×1064 (B) 2.57×1074 (C) 5.98×1066 (D) 2.57×1038
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bohr’s quantization of angular momentum applies to any orbital motion — treat Earth’s revolution as a giant quantum orbit. The quantum number is n≈2.57×1074, matching option (B).
The key idea is that Bohr’s model isn’t limited to electrons. It says angular momentum in any bound orbital motion comes in integer multiples of 2πh (i.e., ℏ). For Earth going around the Sun, we can compute its classical angular momentum and then see which integer n it corresponds to.
- Write Bohr’s quantization condition Bohr’s postulate:
mvr=n2πh=nℏ
Here m is Earth’s mass, v its orbital speed, r the orbit radius, h Planck’s constant, and n the quantum number we want.
-
Plug in the given numbers
- m=6×1024 kg
- v=3×104 m/s
- r=1.5×1011 m
- h=6.63×10−34 J⋅s (standard value)
First compute the classical angular momentum:
L=mvr=(6×1024)×(3×104)×(1.5×1011)
Multiply stepwise:
6×3×1.5=27
Powers of ten: 1024×104×1011=1039
So L=27×1039=2.7×1040 kg⋅m2/s
- Find n From L=nℏ, we have
n=ℏL=2π6.63×10−342.7×1040
Compute ℏ: …
- KCET 2022Set B-31 markMCQQ.If an electron is revolving in its Bohr orbit having Bohr radius of 0.529 A∘, then the radius of third orbit is (A) 4.761 A∘ (B) 5125 nm (C) 4234 nm (D) 4.496 A∘
›Reveal solutionSolution
The Bohr orbit radius scales as rn=n2a0; multiply the given first-orbit (Bohr) radius by n2=9 to get the third orbit's radius.
Step 1 — The Bohr radius formula
In Bohr's model of the hydrogen-like atom, the radius of the n-th permitted orbit is
rn=n2a0
where a0 is the radius of the first orbit (n=1), called the Bohr radius. Here a0=0.529 A∘ is given directly (its theoretical value a0=mee24πε0ℏ2≈0.529 A∘ is exactly this number, so no separate derivation of a0 is needed).
Step 2 — Apply for the third orbit
For the third orbit, n=3, so n2=9:
r3=9×a0=9×0.529 A∘=4.761 A∘
Step 3 — Check the other options …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.Angular momentum of an electron in hydrogen atom is 2π3h (h is the Planck's constant). The K.E. of the electron is (A) 4.35 eV (B) 1.51 eV (C) 3.4 eV (D) 6.8 eV
›Reveal solutionSolution
Read off n from Bohr's angular-momentum quantisation, then use K.E.=+n213.6 eV (kinetic energy is the negative of the total energy in a Coulomb orbit).
Step 1 — Find the orbit number n.
Bohr's second postulate quantises angular momentum in units of h/2π:
L=2πnh.
Given L=2π3h, comparing gives
n=3.
Step 2 — Relate kinetic energy to total energy.
For an electron bound by the Coulomb force, the electrostatic attraction supplies the centripetal force:
r2ke2=rmv2⟹K21mv2=2rke2,U=−rke2=−2K.
Hence the total energy E=K+U=−K, i.e. K=−E (the virial theorem for an inverse-square field).
Step 3 — Put in the hydrogen energy level. …
- KCET 2018Set A-11 markMCQQ.The total energy of an electron revolving in the second orbit of hydrogen atom is (A) −13.6 eV (B) −1.51 eV (C) −3.4 eV (D) Zero
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bohr's energy formula En=−13.6/n2 eV, evaluated at n=2.
Step 1 — The Bohr energy levels of hydrogen.
Bohr's model gives the total energy (kinetic + electrostatic potential) of the electron in the n-th orbit as
En=−8ε02h2n2me4=−n213.6 eV
The energy is negative because the electron is bound: work must be done to pull it to infinity, where E=0.
Step 2 — Substitute n=2 (the second orbit).
E2=−2213.6=−413.6=−3.4 eV
Step 3 — Check the distractors. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.