Q.Four different closed surfaces, of different shapes and different sizes, are considered. Each one of the four surfaces encloses one and the same single point charge +q (and no other charge). Consider the electric flux through each surface.
Concept understanding — Gauss Law
Gauss's Law is a shortcut. Instead of adding up the Coulomb contribution of every charge — a nightmare of vectors and integrals — it lets you read the field straight off the symmetry of a problem. The whole idea rests on one quantity: electric flux.
Flux — field-lines counted through a surface. For a uniform field E crossing a flat area A, the flux is Φ = E·A = EA cosθ, where θ is the angle between the field and the normal to the surface. Picture the field as a bundle of lines; flux is how many pierce the surface. When E is edge-on (θ = 90°) nothing passes through and Φ = 0; when E is ⊥ to the surface (θ = 0) the count is maximal. For a closed surface, Φ is the net number of lines leaving it — lines that enter and exit cancel.
The law itself. Gauss's law states that the net flux out of any closed surface depends only on the charge trapped inside:
Φ = q_enclosed / ε₀.
Two consequences do most of the work. First, only enclosed charge counts — a charge outside sends as many lines in as out, so its net contribution is exactly zero. Second, the surface's shape is irrelevant; move the charge around inside or deform the surface, and Φ never changes.
Why symmetry makes it powerful. By itself Φ = q/ε₀ has E buried in an integral. It becomes a tool only when you pick a Gaussian surface matched to the symmetry — one where E is constant and everywhere either ⊥ to the surface (so Φ = EA) or ∥ to it (contributing nothing). Then E slides out and you solve in one line. This works for exactly three geometries:
1 — Infinite line charge (linear density λ). Use a coaxial cylinder: E = λ / 2πε₀r, falling off as ∝ 1/r.
2 — Infinite sheet (surface density σ). Use a pillbox pierced through the sheet: E = σ / 2ε₀ — uniform and completely independent of distance. The field near a large charged plane simply doesn't weaken as you step back.
3 — Spherical shell / sphere. For a thin shell of charge Q, a Gaussian sphere inside encloses nothing, so E = 0 everywhere within; outside, the charge acts as if concentrated at the centre, E = kQ/r² — indistinguishable from a point charge. For a solid uniformly charged sphere, an interior surface encloses only the charge within radius r, giving E ∝ r (rising linearly from zero at the centre) up to the surface, then 1/r² beyond.
Field just outside a conductor. A charged conductor holds all its charge on the surface with E = 0 inside, so a straddling pillbox gives E = σ / ε₀ just outside — twice the sheet result, because all the flux escapes on the one outer face.
How it's examined. JEE questions test whether you can spot the symmetry, pick the right surface, and recall which result scales as 1/r, which is flat, and which is 1/r². The physics is always the one line Φ = q_enclosed / ε₀, and the skill is knowing that only the enclosed charge — never the far-off one — ever matters.
"Gauss law class 12 physics derivation" and "electric field due to infinite sheet using Gauss law" are heavily searched terms, since this is one of the core results of the Electrostatics chapter in the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Physics curriculum. Gauss's law applications for spheres, sheets, and line charges are near-guaranteed questions in JEE Main, NEET, and state CETs.
Why this formula?
Gauss's Law: Why It Holds
Gauss's Law is one of the four Maxwell's equations and a cornerstone of electromagnetism. Let's build the understanding from the ground up — not just the formula, but the why.
1. The Core Idea: Flux as "Flow" of Field
Imagine an electric field E passing through a small patch of area dA. The electric flux through that patch is:
dΦE=E⋅dA=EdAcosθ
where θ is the angle between E and the outward normal to the surface.
Why this definition?
- If E is perpendicular to the surface (θ=0), maximum field "flows through".
- If E is parallel (θ=90∘), no flux — the field just slides along the surface.
Total flux through a closed surface S is:
ΦE=∮SE⋅dA
2. The Key Insight: Flux Depends Only on Enclosed Charge
Consider a single point charge +q at the centre of a spherical surface of radius r.
- By Coulomb's law, at every point on the sphere: E=4πε01r2q, radially outward.
- The area vector dA is also radially outward.
- So E⋅dA=EdA everywhere.
The total flux:
ΦE=∮EdA=E∮dA=(4πε01r2q)(4πr2)=ε0q
Notice: The r2 cancels! The flux is independent of the radius.
3. Why Shape Doesn't Matter
Now, what if the surface is not spherical but any closed shape enclosing the charge?
- Draw a small cone from the charge to the surface.
- The flux through a patch dA at distance r is dΦ=4πε01r2qcosθdA.
- But r2cosθdA is exactly the solid angle dΩ subtended by dA at the charge.
So dΦ=4πε0qdΩ.
Integrating over the entire closed surface: ∮dΩ=4π (total solid angle around a point).
Hence:
ΦE=4πε0q⋅4π=ε0q
Result: For any closed surface enclosing q, the flux is ε0q.
4. Multiple Charges: Superposition
If there are many charges q1,q2,…,qn inside the surface, the total electric field is the vector sum of individual fields:
E=E1+E2+⋯+En
Flux is linear:
∮E⋅dA=∮E1⋅dA+∮E2⋅dA+⋯=ε0q1+ε0q2+⋯=ε0Qenc
Charges outside the surface contribute zero net flux — their field lines enter and exit the surface, cancelling out.
5. The Final Law
∮SE⋅dA=ε0Qenc
Why it's profound:
- It relates a global property (flux through a surface) to a local source (charge inside).
- It's true for any closed surface, not just symmetric ones.
- It's a direct consequence of Coulomb's inverse-square law — the 1/r2 dependence is essential for the cancellation.
6. Quick Exam Tip
| Situation | What to remember |
|---|---|
| Point charge | Flux = q/ε0 through any enclosing surface |
| Dipole inside | Net flux = 0 (equal + and -) |
| Charge outside | Flux contribution = 0 |
| Symmetric surfaces | Use Gauss's law to find E easily |
Key takeaway: Gauss's law holds because the electric field from a point charge obeys the inverse-square law, making the flux through any closed surface independent of the surface's shape — it depends only on the total charge enclosed.
By Gauss's law the flux through any closed surface depends only on the charge enclosed, not on the surface's shape or size. All four enclose the same +q, so the flux is identical for all four.
Φ=ε0qenc=ε0q for every surface, since each encloses the same charge.
Option (d): the flux is the same for all the surfaces.
Gauss's law says the net electric flux through a closed surface equals the enclosed charge divided by ε0 and is completely independent of the surface's shape or size. Since all four surfaces enclose the same single charge +q, they all have the same flux.
Concept
Gauss's law:
Φ=∮SE⋅dS=ε0qenc.
Only the enclosed charge matters; the geometry of the surface does not.
Steps
- Each of the four surfaces encloses exactly one charge, +q.
- Therefore for each, qenc=q.
- Hence Φ=q/ε0 for all four — a common value.
Why the others fail
- ,
- ,
- all assume the flux depends on the size/shape of the surface. It does not — the extra field lines that pierce a larger or more distorted surface enter and leave in equal numbers, leaving the net count fixed by qenc alone.
✓Final answer
Option (d): the electric flux is the same for all the figures.
Method: Using Gauss's Law to Compare Flux Through Different Surfaces
Use this whenever you must compare the electric flux through several closed surfaces without computing any electric field directly.
Steps
Step 1: Identify the enclosed charge for each surface.
Gauss's law says the total flux through ANY closed surface depends only on the net charge strictly inside it:
Φ=∮SE⋅dS=ε0qenc
List qenc for every surface under comparison.
Step 2: Discard shape and size as variables.
Because Φ depends only on qenc, two surfaces enclosing the same charge have identical flux, however different their shape or size. Any option that ties flux to a surface's shape/size once qenc is equal is automatically wrong.
Step 3 (Applying to this problem): compare only the qenc values.
If every candidate surface encloses the same single charge, all their fluxes equal qenc/ε0 and are therefore identical — conclude accordingly rather than reasoning about the surfaces' geometry.
- KEAM 2026Set eng-2026-04194 marksMCQQ.If a spherical conductor of 10 cm radius contains 5×106 electrons, then the electric field on its surface (in NC−1) is (A) 0.86 (B) 0.36 (C) 0.45 (D) 1.44 (E) 0.72
›Reveal solutionSolution
Find the surface charge, then use E=kQ/r2 at the sphere's surface.
Total charge:
Q=ne=(5×106)(1.6×10−19)=8×10−13 C.
Field at the surface of a conducting sphere of radius r=0.1 m:
E=r2kQ=(0.1)2(9×109)(8×10−13)=0.017.2×10−3=0.72 N C−1.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (E).
- KEAM 2026Set eng-2026-04214 marksMCQQ.If an infinitely long uniformly charged wire produces an electric field of intensity E at a distance of d from it, then the linear charge density λ of the wire is (A) πϵ0Ed (B) 2πϵ0Ed (C) 21ϵ0Ed (D) 2πϵ0Ed (E) ϵ0Ed
›Reveal solutionSolution
Invert E=2πϵ0dλ to get λ=2πϵ0Ed.
For an infinite line charge, Gauss's law gives E=2πϵ0dλ at perpendicular distance d.
Rearranging: λ=2πϵ0Ed.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
- KEAM 2026Set eng-2026-04224 marksMCQQ.A uniformly charged cube of side one cm having surface charge density of 8.85 μC cm−2 is placed inside a hollow metal sphere. The total flux emerging out of the sphere in Nm2C−1 is (ε0=8.85×10−12 C2N−1m−2) (A) 8.85×106 (B) 12×106 (C) 19.7×106 (D) 3×106 (E) 6×106
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Gauss's law the flux out of the enclosing sphere is the total charge divided by ε0.
The cube (side 1 cm) has 6 faces of 1cm2 each, total area 6cm2.
Total charge Q=σA=8.85μC cm−2×6cm2=53.1μC=53.1×10−6C.
Flux =ε0Q=8.85×10−1253.1×10−6=6×106Nm2C−1.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (E).
- KEAM 2026Set pha-2026-0420F4 marksMCQQ.Electric-flux through a closed surface depends on the (A) shape of the surface (B) area of the surface (C) volume of the surface (D) electric field outside the surface (E) charge enclosed by the surface
›Reveal solutionSolution
Gauss's law: Φ=qenc/ε0 — only the enclosed charge matters.
Gauss's law states
ΦE=∮E⋅dA=ε0qenclosed.
The net electric flux through a closed surface depends only on the total charge enclosed by it — not on the shape, area or volume of the surface, nor on charges lying outside it. Hence (E).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (E).
- KEAM 2025Set eng-2025-04234 marksMCQQ.The inward and outward electric flux from a closed surface are 6×104 NM2C−1 and 3×104 NM2C−1. Then the net charge (in coulomb) inside the closed surface is (A) −6×104ε0 (B) 6×104ε0 (C) 3×104ε0 (D) 9×104ε0 (E) [AMBIGUOUS]
›Reveal solutionSolution
[!TLDR]
Using Gauss's law with net flux =ϕout−ϕin=−3×104 gives an enclosed charge of −3×104ε0 C, which matches option (E).
Concept
Gauss's law states that the net electric flux through a closed surface equals the enclosed charge divided by the permittivity of free space: ϕnet=ε0qenc. Outward flux is taken positive and inward flux negative — the standard NCERT/CBSE electrostatics convention the KEAM syllabus is aligned with.
Solution
The net flux through the surface is the outward flux minus the inward flux:
ϕnet=ϕout−ϕin=3×104−6×104=−3×104 Nm2C−1.
By Gauss's law the enclosed charge is
qenc=ε0ϕnet=−3×104ε0 C.
The negative sign correctly reflects that more flux enters than leaves, so the enclosed charge is negative. This value, −3×104ε0, is not any of the printed options (A)–(D) (−6×104ε0, 6×104ε0, 3×104ε0, 9×104ε0), so by elimination it corresponds to option (E).
[!ANSWER]
(E) qenc=−3×104ε0 C
- KEAM 2025Set eng-2025-04274 marksMCQQ.The electric field inside a uniformly charged spherical shell of radius R is: (A) directly proportional to the charge within the shell (B) inversely proportional to R2 (C) same as that outside the shell (D) zero (E) maximum at the centre
›Reveal solutionSolution
A Gaussian surface inside a uniformly charged spherical shell encloses no charge, so E=0 everywhere inside.
For a uniformly charged spherical shell, apply Gauss's law to a concentric spherical surface of radius r<R. It encloses zero net charge, so
∮E⋅dA=ε0qenc=0⇒E=0.
The electric field is zero at every point inside the shell.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
- KEAM 2024Set eng-2024-06094 marksMCQQ.The electric field due to a an infinitely long thin wire with linear charge density λ at a radial distance r is proportional to (A) rλ2 (B) rλ (C) r2λ (D) rλ (E) rλ
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Gauss's law the field of an infinite line charge is E=2πε0rλ, i.e. proportional to λ/r.
Using a cylindrical Gaussian surface of radius r:
E=2πε0rλ∝rλ.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
- KEAM 2023Set eng-2023-P1-A14 marksMCQQ.A hollow sphere of radius 'r' encloses an electric dipole composed of two charges +q and −q. The net flux of electric field through the surface of the sphere due to the enclosed dipole is: (A) ε02q (B) ε02q⋅4πr2 (C) infinite (D) zero (E) ε0q
›Reveal solutionSolution
The net electric flux through the sphere is zero.
Concept and Intuition
By Gauss's law the flux depends only on the enclosed net charge. A dipole encloses +q and −q, whose sum is zero.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Enclosed charge =+q+(−q)=0.
- Gauss's law: Φ=ε0Qenc=ε00.
- Φ=0.
Common Mistakes
- Thinking the strong dipole field near the surface implies non-zero flux.
- Adding the magnitudes of the charges instead of their signed sum.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — zero.
ANSWER: D
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.