Skip to content
NCERT Exemplar · Q20

Q.A wheel in uniform motion about an axis passing through its centre and perpendicular to its plane is considered to be in mechanical (translational plus rotational) equilibrium because no net external force or torque is required to sustain its motion. However, the particles that constitute the wheel do experience a centripetal acceleration directed towards the centre. How do you reconcile this fact with the wheel being in equilibrium?
How would you set a half-wheel into uniform motion about an axis passing through the centre of mass of the wheel and perpendicular to its plane? Will you require external forces to sustain the motion?

Madhya Pradesh MpbseShort· 3mImportance★★★★★est
86% · 49/57 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

A wheel spinning uniformly about a fixed axis through its own centre is in equilibrium because the centripetal acceleration of every particle is supplied entirely by internal forces, which cancel in pairs and contribute no net external force or torque. The same argument applies unchanged to a half-wheel spinning about an axis through its own centre of mass: no external torque is needed to sustain the motion, regardless of the half-wheel's lack of symmetry. An external torque is needed only to start it spinning, not to keep it going.

Reconciling equilibrium with centripetal acceleration

Mechanical equilibrium of a rigid body means: zero net external force (so the centre of mass doesn't accelerate) and zero net external torque (so the angular velocity doesn't change). A uniformly spinning wheel satisfies both — its centre of mass sits still at the axis, and ω\omega is constant.

But every particle of the wheel does have centripetal acceleration, directed toward the centre. This is not a contradiction: that acceleration is supplied by internal forces — the elastic (interatomic) forces holding the rigid body together. By Newton's third law, these internal forces occur in equal-and-opposite pairs between neighbouring particles. Summed over the whole wheel, they cancel completely and contribute zero net force and zero net torque on the wheel as a whole. Internal forces can accelerate individual particles; they cannot move or spin up the body as a whole. That is why no external force or torque is required to sustain the wheel's uniform rotation, even though each particle is constantly accelerating.

Does the half-wheel need an external torque to keep spinning?

The same internal-force argument applies to any rigid body, symmetric or not, as long as it rotates about an axis through its own centre of mass. For a flat (planar) body like a half-wheel, an axis perpendicular to its plane through its centre of mass is automatically a principal axis of the body — a mathematical fact true for every lamina, regardless of how irregular its shape is. Rotating about a principal axis means the angular momentum vector L⃗=Iω⃗\vec{L}=I\vec{\omega} stays fixed along that same axis as the body spins, with no tendency to wander.

So once the half-wheel is spinning at angular velocity ω\omega about an axis through its own centre of mass:

  • its centre of mass is on the axis and stationary — no net external force needed;
  • L⃗\vec{L} stays constant along the axis — no net external torque needed. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.