Skip to content
Question 22 of 37

Q.‘Mudro Infratech’ got a short-term contract for building two villas within a period of ten months with the expectation to earn a huge amount of profit. The Works Manager accepted this challenge and completed the work within the given time period. The profit of the company went up by 40% due to this temporary order. The Finance Manager was aware that the company would not earn this huge profit in the near future. So, he decided not to increase dividend per share as earnings for the year had gone up, but not the earning potential of the company. He also knew that this increase in earnings was temporary in nature. The factor affecting Dividend Decision being highlighted above is : (A) Cash flow position (B) Shareholders’ preference (C) Growth opportunities (D) Stability of dividends

Manipur CohsemCBSE Class XII Board 2024MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
59% · 22/37 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The Finance Manager chose not to raise dividends despite a 40% profit spike because the earnings surge was temporary, not a reflection of the company's long-term earning capacity — a decision driven by the principle of Stability of dividends. The answer is (D).

Why Stability of Dividends Matters

When a company earns profits, shareholders naturally expect a share of those earnings as dividends. But here's the tension: should management distribute every rupee of profit immediately, or should they think about what those dividends signal to the market?

The Finance Manager in this scenario faces a classic dilemma. The company just earned a windfall — a 40% jump in profit — but from a one-time contract that won't repeat. If he raises the dividend now, shareholders will come to expect that higher payout every year. When next year's earnings return to normal levels and the dividend has to be cut, the market will panic. Share prices will fall, investor confidence will erode, and the company will look unstable.

Stability of dividends is the principle that companies should maintain a steady, predictable dividend policy even when short-term earnings fluctuate. Investors value consistency. A stable dividend signals that management is confident in the company's long-term prospects and isn't being swayed by temporary noise. It also prevents the psychological damage of a dividend cut, which is almost always punished more harshly by the market than a dividend increase is rewarded.


Breaking Down the Decision

Let's see why the Finance Manager's reasoning points squarely at stability of dividends, and why the other factors don't fit.

  1. The earnings spike is temporary, not structural.

    The company landed a short-term contract — two villas in ten months. The Works Manager delivered, profits soared by 40%, but everyone knows this isn't the new normal. The earning potential of the company — its ability to generate profits year after year — hasn't changed. This is a one-off windfall, not a step-change in the business model.

  2. The Finance Manager explicitly avoids raising the dividend.

    He could have declared a higher dividend per share and made shareholders happy in the short run. But he chose not to. Why? Because he's thinking about next year. If he raises the dividend now, he'll have to cut it when earnings normalize. That cut will hurt the company's reputation and share price far more than the temporary boost from a higher payout.

  3. This is about smoothing dividends over time.

    The principle of stability of dividends says that management should aim for a dividend policy that can be sustained through business cycles. When earnings are unusually high, retain more; when earnings dip, dip into reserves if needed to maintain the dividend. The goal is a smooth, predictable payout that shareholders can rely on. The Finance Manager is doing exactly that — he's refusing to let a temporary spike distort the dividend policy.

  4. Why the other options don't fit:

    • (A) Cash flow position: The problem doesn't mention any cash crunch or liquidity issue. The company earned a profit and presumably has the cash. The decision isn't about ability to pay; it's about wisdom of paying.
    • (B) Shareholders' preference: There's no discussion of what shareholders want. In fact, many shareholders would prefer a stable, predictable dividend over a volatile one, but the passage doesn't hinge on polling shareholder opinion — it's about the Finance Manager's judgment. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.