Skip to content
Question of 18

Q.Which of the following statements is not an argument in favour of continuation of the agricultural subsidies in India?
(A) Subsidies encourage farmers to adopt new technologies
(B) Subsidies mainly benefit the fertilizer industry and big farmers
(C) Subsidies aim to reduce the inequalities between rich and poor farmers
(D) Subsidies help farmers to face the uncertainties of future

Manipur CohsemCOHSEM Manipur Higher Secondary Board (Commerce) 2025MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
0% · 0/18 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Statements (A), (C) and (D) are standard arguments for continuing agricultural subsidies; statement (B) -- that subsidies mainly benefit the fertilizer industry and big, already well-off farmers rather than the small and marginal farmers who need them most -- is the standard argument against subsidies, so it is the one that is not in favour.

Arguments commonly given in favour of agricultural subsidies include: they encourage the adoption of new, high-yielding technology among farmers who would otherwise be reluctant to take the risk (A); they help offset the disadvantage faced by poor farmers relative to large farmers, promoting equity (C); and they provide a cushion against the price/weather/market uncertainties farmers face (D). In contrast, critics argue that, over time, subsidies have mainly b …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.