Q.Answer the following questions:
[!FORMULA]But while the value of is physically significant, the value of (and therefore, the value of the phase speed ) has no physical significance. Why?
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Five short conceptual answers: (a) free quarks have never been isolated (quark confinement), so fractional charges never appear on an isolated oil drop;
(b) e/m, not e or m alone, is what directly sets a charged particle's motion in electric/magnetic fields;
(c) gas conduction needs a long mean free path for ionisation avalanches, which only low pressure provides;
(d) a metal's free electrons occupy a range of energies below the work function's reference level, so photoelectrons emerge with a spread of kinetic energies; (e) only (via momentum, a directly measurable, unambiguous quantity) is physically significant for a matter wave — and the phase speed depend on an arbitrary energy-zero reference and carry no direct physical meaning, unlike the group velocity, which does equal the particle's actual speed.
- Why don't fractional quark charges show up in Millikan's experiment? Quarks are never found as free, isolated particles — a fundamental property of the strong nuclear force called quark confinement means quarks always exist bound together inside composite particles (like protons and neutrons), and no experiment has ever isolated a single free quark. Millikan's oil-drop experiment measures the charge sitting on a free, isolated oil droplet, which can only ever pick up whole, isolated charges (electrons or ions) — never an isolated fractional quark charge, since none exists in a free state to be picked up. Hence oil drops always show charge in integer multiples of , never fractions of it.
- Why is e/m special, rather than e and m separately? The quantity e/m (specific charge) is what directly determines how a charged particle moves in electric and magnetic fields — for example, in the equation of motion , dividing through by shows the particle's acceleration depends only on the ratio , not on and individually. Experiments that observe a charged particle's deflection or circular path in known fields (like J.J. Thomson's original cathode-ray experiment) can therefore measure e/m directly from the observed trajectory, without needing to know or separately. Determining and individually requires a further, independent experiment (such as Millikan's oil-drop experiment, which measures alone) — e/m is simply the combination that appears naturally in, and is measurable from, the dynamics.
- Why are gases insulators at ordinary pressure but conduct at low pressure? At ordinary (high) pressure, gas molecules are packed closely together, so the mean free path (average distance a charged particle can travel between collisions) is very short. Any free ion or electron produced by a stray ionising event loses its energy in frequent collisions before it can gain enough energy to ionise another molecule, and recombines quickly — so no sustained current flows, and the gas behaves as an insulator. At very low pressure, molecules are spaced far apart, so the mean free path is much longer; a charged particle accelerated by an applied field can now travel far enough between collisions to build up enough kinetic energy to ionise the next molecule it hits, releasing more free electrons which repeat the process — this cascading "avalanche" of ionisation allows a sustained current to flow, so the low-pressure gas conducts (the operating principle of a gas discharge tube).
- Why is there an energy distribution among photoelectrons, not one fixed energy? …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.