For a zero order reaction will the molecularity be equal to zero? Explain.

NCERT Exemplar · Q29

Q. For a zero order reaction will the molecularity be equal to zero? Explain.

Odisha ChseShort· 2mImportance★★★★★

67% · 78/117 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Zero Order Kinetics

Zero Order Kinetics: The Drug That Doesn't Care How Much You Give It

Imagine you're filling a bathtub. You turn the tap to a fixed flow rate — say, 5 litres per minute. The amount of water in the tub increases by exactly 5 litres every minute, regardless of whether the tub is empty or already half full. That's the core intuition behind zero order kinetics: a constant amount disappears per unit time, no matter how much is left.

Now contrast this with what you probably expect. Most processes in nature follow first order kinetics: the rate depends on how much is present. If you have 100 molecules, 10 might react per second; if you have 10 molecules, only 1 reacts per second. The fraction lost is constant, but the amount lost per second shrinks as the quantity shrinks. Zero order is the opposite — the amount lost per second is fixed, so the fraction lost actually increases as the quantity drops.

The Precise Statement

-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k_0

Where $[A]$ is the concentration of the substance (or amount, depending on context), $t$ is time, and $k_0$ is the zero order rate constant with units of concentration per time (e.g., mg/L per hour, or simply mg/hour if we're talking about total amount).

The negative sign indicates the substance is being removed. The key point: the rate does not depend on $[A]$ . It's a flat, constant rate.

The Integrated Form and Half-Life

If you integrate the differential equation, you get a straight line:

[A]_t = [A]_0 - k_0 t

This is the equation of a line with slope $-k_0$ and intercept $[A]_0$ . Plot concentration vs. time, and you get a straight line sloping downward until it hits zero.

The half-life — the time for the concentration to fall to half its initial value — is:

t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k_0}

Notice something crucial: the half-life depends on the initial concentration. Double the starting amount, and the half-life doubles. This is completely different from first order kinetics, where half-life is constant regardless of starting concentration.

Watch out

A common mistake: students assume half-life is always constant. For zero order, it is not. The half-life changes with the starting amount. If you start with 100 mg, half-life might be 5 hours; start with 200 mg, half-life becomes 10 hours.

Where Does Zero Order Kinetics Actually Happen?

In pharmacology, zero order kinetics is most famously seen with ethanol (alcohol) and aspirin at high doses. The reason is saturation of enzymes.

Your body metabolises alcohol using an enzyme called alcohol dehydrogenase. At low alcohol levels, the enzyme works efficiently and the rate depends on how much alcohol is present (first order). But at higher concentrations — say, after a few drinks — the enzyme becomes saturated. It's working at maximum speed, like a factory running at full capacity. Adding more raw material (alcohol) doesn't make it work faster. The rate becomes constant: a fixed amount of alcohol is metabolised per hour, regardless of how much is in your blood.

This is why alcohol elimination follows a straight line when you plot blood alcohol concentration vs. time. A typical person eliminates about 0.015 g/dL per hour — a fixed amount, not a fixed fraction.

Note

The same saturation principle applies to some drug transporters in the kidneys. When the transport proteins are working at maximum capacity, drug excretion becomes zero order. This is why high doses of certain drugs (like phenytoin) can lead to unexpectedly long elimination times — the system is overwhelmed.

A Quick Comparison Table

Property	Zero Order	First Order
Rate depends on	Nothing (constant)	Concentration
Rate equation	$-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k_0$	$-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k_1[A]$

Why this formula?

Zero Order Kinetics: Why the Formula Holds

Let's build this from the ground up — understanding the why before the what.

The Core Idea

Zero order kinetics describes a process where the rate is constant — it does not depend on the concentration of the reactant.

This is the definition, but why would that ever happen?

Why the Rate is Constant

Imagine a reaction happening on a solid surface (like a catalyst or a tablet dissolving). The reactant molecules must first adsorb onto the surface before reacting.

If the surface is saturated with reactant molecules, adding more reactant in solution doesn't help — the surface is already full.
The reaction proceeds at a fixed speed determined by how fast the surface can process the adsorbed molecules.

Key insight: The rate is limited by the surface, not by how much reactant is floating around.

Deriving the Zero Order Rate Law

Step 1: Write the rate definition

For a reaction $A \rightarrow \text{products}$ , the rate of disappearance of $A$ is:

-\frac{d[A]}{dt} = k

where $k$ is the zero order rate constant (units: concentration/time, e.g., $\text{mol L}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$ ).

Notice: No $[A]$ term on the right side — that's the signature of zero order.

Step 2: Separate variables and integrate

-d[A] = k \, dt

Integrate from initial time $t=0$ (concentration $[A]_0$ ) to time $t$ (concentration $[A]_t$ ):

-\int_{[A]_0}^{[A]_t} d[A] = k \int_0^t dt

-[A]_t + [A]_0 = kt

Step 3: Rearrange to the familiar form

\boxed{[A]_t = [A]_0 - kt}

This is the integrated rate law for zero order kinetics.

What This Formula Tells Us

Linear decrease: Concentration falls linearly with time (not exponentially like first order).
Slope = $-k$ : A plot of $[A]_t$ vs. $t$ gives a straight line with slope $-k$ .
Half-life depends on initial concentration:

Set $[A]_t = \frac{[A]_0}{2}$ :

\frac{[A]_0}{2} = [A]_0 - k t_{1/2}

\boxed{t_{1/2} = \frac{[A]_0}{2k}}

Critical exam point: Unlike first order (where $t_{1/2}$ is constant), zero order half-life increases with higher initial concentration.

--- …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The molecularity of a reaction is never zero — it is a theoretical impossibility. For a zero-order reaction, the rate is independent of concentration, but molecularity (the number of molecules colliding in the rate-determining step) must be at least 1. The correct answer is No.

This question trips up many students because the word "zero" appears in both "zero order" and "molecularity zero" — but they refer to completely different ideas. Let's separate them clearly.

Order is an experimental quantity: it tells you how the rate depends on concentration. For a zero-order reaction, rate = $k$ (constant), meaning the rate does not change when you change concentration. This happens when the reaction is limited by something other than concentration — for example, a catalyst surface that is fully saturated, or a light intensity in a photochemical reaction.

Molecularity is a theoretical concept: it is the number of molecules (atoms, ions) that must collide simultaneously in the rate-determining step of the reaction mechanism. Molecularity is always a positive integer — 1 (unimolecular), 2 (bimolecular), or rarely 3 (termolecular). There is no such thing as a "zero-molecular" step because a reaction step with zero molecules colliding would mean no reaction occurs.

Watch out

Common mistake

Do not confuse the order (which can be zero, fractional, or negative) with molecularity (which is always a whole number ≥ 1). They come from different worlds: order is from experiments, molecularity is from mechanism theory.

Now let's walk through the reasoning step by step.

Define molecularity precisely.

Molecularity refers to the elementary step (a single molecular event) in a reaction mechanism. It counts how many reactant particles come together in that step. For example:
- $A \rightarrow \text{products}$ → unimolecular (molecularity = 1)
- $A + B \rightarrow \text{products}$ → bimolecular (molecularity = 2)
- $2A + B \rightarrow \text{products}$ → termolecular (molecularity = 3)
There is no elementary step with zero particles — that would be a non-event.
Understand why zero-order reactions exist.

A zero-order reaction has rate $= k[A]^0 = k$ . This happens when the rate-limiting step does not involve the reactant whose concentration is being varied. Common examples:
- Decomposition of $NH_3$ on a platinum surface: the surface is saturated, so adding more $NH_3$ doesn't speed things up.
- Photochemical reactions where light intensity (not concentration) controls the rate.
In these cases, the overall reaction may have many steps, but the slow step might involve a catalyst site or a photon — not the reactant itself. The order is zero, but the molecularity of that slow step is still 1 or 2 (e.g., a molecule hitting a surface site, or a molecule absorbing a photon).
Contrast the two concepts directly.

| Property | Order | Molecularity |

|----------|-------|--------------| …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Method: Conceptual Analysis of Reaction Order vs. Molecularity

Method Name: Order–Molecularity Distinction Method

Step 1: Define Zero Order Kinetics

For a zero order reaction, the rate is independent of the concentration of the reactant(s). The rate law is:

\text{Rate} = k[A]^0 = k

Here, $k$ has units of concentration/time (e.g., $\text{mol L}^{-1} \text{s}^{-1}$ ).

Step 2: Define Molecularity

Molecularity is the number of molecules (or atoms) that collide in the rate-determining step of a reaction mechanism. It is always a positive integer (1, 2, or 3) — never zero.

Step 3: Compare the Two Concepts

Feature	Order	Molecularity
Definition	Sum of exponents in rate law	Number of reacting species in the slow step
Can be zero?	Yes (zero order)	No (minimum is 1)
Depends on	Experimental data	Reaction mechanism

Step 4: Answer the Question

No, molecularity cannot be zero for a zero order reaction. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Common Mistakes: Zero Order Kinetics & Molecularity

Students often confuse order of reaction with molecularity — they are not the same thing. Here are the most frequent errors and how to avoid them.

✗ Mistake 1: Assuming Molecularity = Order

The error:

Students think that if a reaction is zero order, its molecularity must also be zero.

Why it's wrong:

Order is an experimental quantity — it tells how rate depends on concentration.
Molecularity is a theoretical concept — it is the number of molecules (or atoms) that collide in the rate-determining step of an elementary reaction.
Molecularity can never be zero — a reaction cannot happen without at least one molecule participating.

✓ How to avoid:

Remember:

Molecularity is always a positive integer (1, 2, or rarely 3). Zero molecularity is meaningless.

✗ Mistake 2: Thinking Zero Order Means "No Molecules Involved"

The error:

Students imagine that zero order implies the reaction occurs without any reactant molecules.

Why it's wrong:

Zero order means the rate is independent of reactant concentration — not that no reactant exists. The reaction still involves molecules; the rate is constant because something else (like a catalyst surface or light intensity) is the limiting factor.

Example:

Decomposition of $\mathrm{NH_3}$ on a platinum surface is zero order.
Molecularity of the slow step is 2 (two $\mathrm{NH_3}$ molecules adsorb and react).

✓ How to avoid:

Think of zero order as "rate doesn't depend on concentration" — not "no molecules."

✗ Mistake 3: Confusing Elementary vs. Complex Reactions

The error:

Students apply molecularity to any reaction, including complex (multi-step) reactions.

Why it's wrong:

Molecularity is defined only for elementary reactions (single-step).
Most zero-order reactions are complex — they have multiple steps.
For complex reactions, we talk about order, not molecularity.

✓ How to avoid:

Ask first: Is this an elementary reaction?

If yes → molecularity applies.

If no → only order is meaningful.

✗ Mistake 4: Giving a "Yes" or "No" Without Explanation

The error:

Students answer "No, molecularity cannot be zero" without explaining why.

Why it's wrong:

Exams expect reasoning, not just the final answer.

✓ How to avoid:

Structure your answer like this:

State clearly: No, molecularity cannot be zero.
Define molecularity: Number of reacting species in the slowest step. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ28 — For a certain reaction large fraction of molecules has energy more tha…→Next questionQ30 — For a general reaction A arrow B, the concentration of A is plotted ag…

Q.For a zero order reaction will the molecularity be equal to zero? Explain.

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days