The chain rule differentiates composite functions: the derivative of sin(x2) is cos(x2)β 2x β differentiate the outer function, then multiply by the derivative of the inside. Integration asks the reverse: given cos(x2)β 2x, find the original function. That's what u substitution does β it reverses the chain rule.
The Core Intuition
When an integral looks like "a function times the derivative of its inside," substitute the inside with u and the derivative of the inside with du. Consider:
β«2xcos(x2)dx
Here 2x is the derivative of x2, and x2 is the inside of cos(x2). Let u=x2, so du=2xdx:
Pull x4 out of the square root and substitute u=1+xβ4; the integral equals β2x21+x4ββ+c, which is option (A).
We want
β«x31+x4βdxβ.
Why factor x4 out? The derivative of x4 is 4x3, so a bare u=x4 substitution wants an x3 in the numerator β but here x3 sits in the denominator. Pulling x4 out of the root converts the problem into one where the exact needed differential does appear.
Method: Substitution when a high power of x blocks the obvious u
Use this for integrands like xm1+xnβ1β where a direct substitution u=1+xn fails because the needed xnβ1 sits in the denominator, not the numerator.
Steps
Step 1: Factor the highest power of x out of the root.
1+xnβ=xn(1+xβn)β=xn/21+xβnβ(x>0).
This deliberately introduces a negative power of x, which is the differential you actually need.
Step 2: Collect all powers of x into one factor.
Rewrite the whole integrand so it reads (power of x) Γ1+xβnβ1β. The power of x should now match the derivative of xβn.
Why it's wrong: then du=4x3dx needs an x3 in the numerator, but here x3 is in the denominator β the substitution leaves stray x's. Correct approach: factor x4 out of the root first to manufacture the xβ5dx that u=1+xβ4 needs.
Mistake 2: Mishandling x4β=x2 signs.
Why it's wrong: x4β=x2 is fine, but pulling out x-powers carelessly (e.g. x4β=x) corrupts the algebra. Correct approach: track exponents precisely β x4β=x2, and 1+xβ4β=1+x4β/x2. β¦