Mathematics · Ch 3 — Matrices
Invertible Matrices
Invertible Matrices
3.7 Invertible Matrices
The Concept of Inverse
Every non-zero number has a reciprocal, whose product with the number is 1. For matrices there is an analogous idea: the inverse of a square matrix, whose product with the matrix is the identity matrix (the matrix equivalent of 1).
Only square matrices can have inverses. For a rectangular matrix, the products and cannot both be defined and equal.
Definition of Inverse
Let be a square matrix of order . If there exists a square matrix of the same order such that
then is the inverse of , written , and is invertible.
is read "A inverse". It does not mean — division is not defined for matrices.
Example
Let and .
Since , we have and also .
If is the inverse of , then is automatically the inverse of — the relationship is mutual.
Theorem 3: Uniqueness of Inverse
Statement: The inverse of a square matrix, if it exists, is unique.
Proof: Suppose has two inverses and , so and . Then
using associativity and . Hence : the inverse is unique, so we may speak of the inverse of .
Theorem 4: Inverse of a Product
Statement: If and are invertible matrices of the same order, then
Proof: Start from and pre-multiply by :
Now pre-multiply by :
A common mistake is . The order reverses — like removing shoes before socks. This extends to more factors: .
›Proof
Verification. , and . Both products equal , so satisfies the definition of .
Check Your Understanding …
Definition of Invertible Matrices
Let be a square matrix of order (i.e., it has rows and columns).
If there exists another square matrix of the same order such that
(where is the identity matrix of order ), then:
- is called the inverse of , written as .
- is said to be invertible (or non-singular).
Key conditions from the textbook:
- Both and must be square matrices of the same order — a rectangular matrix cannot have an inverse.
- The products and must both equal the identity matrix .
- If is the inverse of , then is also the inverse of (i.e., ).
- The inverse of a square matrix, if it exists, is unique (Theorem 3).
Intuition
Think of a number: the inverse of is because .
For matrices, the identity matrix plays the role of "1". So is the matrix that "undoes" — multiplying them in either order gives back .
Tiny Concrete Example
Let
Then …
Theorem 4 (Reversal Law for Inverses)
If and are invertible matrices of the same order, then the product is also invertible, and its inverse is given by the reverse-order product of the individual inverses:
Hypotheses:
- and are square matrices of the same order (say ).
- Both and are invertible — that is, there exist matrices and such that and , where is the identity matrix of order .
The order matters: the inverse of a product is the product of the inverses in reverse order. This is not a commutative law — you cannot swap and unless they happen to commute, which is rare.
Proof
›Proof
We start from the definition of the inverse. To show that is the inverse of , we must verify that
Step 1 — Multiply on the right by :
Here we used the associative property of matrix multiplication: .
Since , this becomes
Step 2 — Multiply on the left by :
Again by associativity: .
Since , we get
Both products equal the identity matrix . Therefore, by definition, is the inverse of , and we write
Why This Matters …
Theorem 4 (Reversal Law for Inverses)
If and are invertible matrices of the same order, then the product is also invertible, and its inverse is given by the reverse-order product of the individual inverses:
Hypotheses:
- and are square matrices of the same order (say ).
- Both and are invertible — that is, there exist matrices and such that and , where is the identity matrix of order .
The order matters: the inverse of a product is the product of the inverses in reverse order. This is not a commutative law — you cannot swap and unless they happen to commute, which is rare.
Proof
›Proof
We start from the definition of the inverse. To show that is the inverse of , we must verify that
Step 1 — Multiply on the right by :
Here we used the associative property of matrix multiplication: .
Since , this becomes
Step 2 — Multiply on the left by :
Again by associativity: .
Since , we get
Both products equal the identity matrix . Therefore, by definition, is the inverse of , and we write