Skip to content

Physics · Ch 1 — Nature of Physical World and Measurement

Accuracy and Precision

1.6.1

Accuracy and Precision

Two words are often used loosely in everyday speech but mean two different things in measurement theory:

  • Accuracy -- how close a measured value is to the true (theoretical) value.
  • Precision -- how close repeated measurements are to each other, i.e. how reproducible the measurement is, regardless of whether they are close to the truth.

Worked example (temperature): suppose a refrigerator's real temperature is 9∘9^\circC, and a thermometer repeatedly reads 10.4,10.2,10.3,10.1,10.2,10.1,10.1,10.110.4,10.2,10.3,10.1,10.2,10.1,10.1,10.1 (∘^\circC). All the readings cluster tightly around 10∘10^\circC, so the thermometer is precise; but since 10∘10^\circC is about 1∘1^\circC off the true 9∘9^\circC, it is not accurate.

Worked example (length): suppose your true height is exactly 5′9′′5'9''. Measuring with a yardstick repeatedly gives 5′0′′5'0'' -- consistent (precise) but wrong (not accurate). Measuring with a laser yardstick gives 5′9′′5'9'' -- both correct (accurate) and consistent (precise).

Numerical example (resolution vs. accuracy). The true value of a length is near 5.6785.678 cm. A coarse instrument (resolution 0.10.1 cm) reads 5.55.5 cm; a finer instrument (resolution 0.010.01 cm) reads 5.385.38 cm. The first reading is more accurate (closer to 5.6785.678) but less precise (coarser resolution); the second is less accurate but more precise -- accuracy and precision can pull in opposite directions for the same object. …

Figure 1.9Visual example of accuracy and precision

What this figure shows. Three targets showing shot clusters: (a) scattered around but not near the bull's-eye -- not accurate, not precise; (b) tightly clustered together but off-centre -- precise but not accurate; (c) tightly clustered right at the bull's-eye -- both accurate and precise. …