Concept understanding — Polynomials with Additional Conditions
When an equation's coefficients hide a spottable pattern — even powers only, coefficients summing to zero, matching odd/even sums, a partly-factored shape, or a disguised non-polynomial form — a substitution collapses it to a lower-degree (usually quadratic) equation.
Only even powers present. A degree-2n equation with every odd-power coefficient =0 becomes a genuine degree-n equation under y=x2; each root yr then gives up to two x-roots via x=±yr. (E.g. x4−9x2+20=0→y2−9y+20=0=(y−4)(y−5), giving x=±2,±5.)
Coefficients sum to zero. The coefficient sum is exactly P(1), so a zero sum means 1 is always a root — an immediate first factor to divide out.
Odd-power sum equals even-power sum. This is exactly the "coefficients of P(−x) sum to zero" condition in disguise, so −1 is always a root.
Partly-factored quartics(ax+b)(cx+d)(px+q)(rx+s)+k=0 can often be re-paired so two pairs of factors expand to quadratics sharing the same x2- and x-coefficient; substituting y= that shared quadratic expression collapses the quartic to a quadratic in y.
Genuinely non-polynomial equations (radical equations, or trigonometric equations that are secretly polynomial in sinx or cosx) become real polynomial equations after the right substitution — but three honest cautions apply: not every derived root solves the original equation (check back, since squaring especially can manufacture extraneous roots); the original equation can have infinitely many solutions (e.g. every cosx=21 solution, x=2nπ±3π); or it can have none at all if the derived polynomial's roots fall outside the valid range (e.g. cosx=4 is impossible).
Worked illustration (zero coefficient sum).x3−3x2−33x+35=0: coefficients sum to 0, so 1 is a root; dividing by (x−1) leaves x2−2x−35=(x−7)(x+5). Roots: 1,7,−5.
Set y=sinx: y2−5y+4=0=(y−1)(y−4); reject y=4 (outside [−1,1]).
12x3−29x2+8x+4=0 has rational root x=2; divide and finish.
✓Final answer
(i) x=2π+2nπ,n∈Z (ii) x=2,32,−41
Step 1. Part (i). Set y=sinx: y2−5y+4=0=(y−1)(y−4), giving y=1 or y=4.
Step 2. Discard the impossible value. Since −1≤sinx≤1, sinx=4 is impossible. Only sinx=1 is valid.
Step 3. Solve sinx=1.x=2π+2nπ for every integer n.
Step 4. Part (ii). Rewrite as 12x3−29x2+8x+4=0. Testing the Rational-Root-Theorem candidate x=2: 12(8)−29(4)+8(2)+4=96−116+16+4=0✓.
Step 5. Divide by (x−2). Quotient: 12x2−5x−2. Δ=25+96=121=112; x=245±11, giving x=32 or x=−41.
✓Final answer
(i) x=2π+2nπ,n∈Z (ii) x=2,32,−41
Polynomials with Additional Conditions (i, trig substitution) and Remainder Theorem and Synthetic Division (ii, rational-root trial).
Forgetting sinx=4 must be discarded as impossible (part i)
Missing that sinx=1 has infinitely many solutions, not just x=π/2 (part i)