Q.A short bar magnet of magnetic moment m=0.32J T−1 is placed in a uniform magnetic field of 0.15T. If the bar is free to rotate in the plane of the field, which orientation would correspond to its
(a) stable, and
(b) unstable equilibrium? What is the potential energy of the magnet in each case?
Imagine you have a bar magnet — the kind you might have stuck on your refrigerator. If you bring two of them close, something interesting happens. Sometimes they snap together with a satisfying click. Other times, they push each other away, refusing to touch no matter how hard you try.
That's not random. Every magnet has two special regions, one at each end, where the magnetic force is strongest. These are its magnetic poles.
Note
The word "pole" comes from the Greek polos, meaning "pivot" or "axis" — the Earth itself has a North Pole and a South Pole, and it behaves like a giant magnet.
The Two Types of Poles
Every magnet has exactly two poles: a north pole and a south pole. You cannot have a magnet with only one pole — cut a bar magnet in half, and each half immediately becomes a complete magnet with its own north and south poles.
The rule of interaction is simple and memorable:
Unlike poles attract: north pulls south, south pulls north.
Like poles repel: north pushes north away; south pushes south away.
This is the fundamental behaviour. No exceptions.
The Precise Statement
Magnetic poles are the regions of a magnet where the external magnetic field is strongest. Every magnet has exactly two poles — a north pole and a south pole — that cannot be isolated. Like poles repel; unlike poles attract.
The key points to remember for exams:
Poles always come in pairs — there is no magnetic monopole (a single isolated pole) in nature, despite decades of searching.
The north pole is defined as the pole that points toward Earth's geographic north when the magnet is freely suspended.
The south pole points toward Earth's geographic south.
A Common Confusion (Watch Out)
Watch out
Earth's geographic North Pole is actually a magnetic south pole. Why? Because the north pole of a compass needle (which is a magnetic north pole) is attracted to it. And unlike poles attract. So the Earth's north pole behaves like a magnetic south pole. This often trips students up in exams.
Why This Matters
Magnetic poles are the starting point for understanding everything from simple compasses to electric motors, generators, and MRI machines. The idea that "opposites attract" in magnetism is the same principle that makes electric charges behave the way they do — but with one crucial difference: you can have a single positive or negative electric charge, but you can never have a single magnetic pole.
That asymmetry is one of the deepest facts about magnetism.
The behaviour of magnetic poles — always in pairs, with like poles repelling and unlike poles attracting — is covered in the NCERT Class 12 Physics chapter on magnetism and matter, a frequent source of short-answer CBSE board questions. Searches for "magnetic poles and Earth's magnetism class 12 physics" will find this north-south pole explanation, including the Earth's-north-pole-is-a-magnetic-south-pole detail, matches the NCERT textbook's own framing.
Why this formula?
Magnetic Poles: Why the Key Formulas Hold
Let's build this from first principles — understanding why a magnetic pole behaves the way it does, not just memorizing the result.
1. What Is a Magnetic Pole?
A magnetic pole is a conceptual point where the magnetic field appears to originate or terminate. In reality, magnetic poles always come in north-south pairs (no isolated monopoles exist in nature), but we treat them as idealized sources for calculations.
North pole: source of magnetic field lines (outward)
South pole: sink of magnetic field lines (inward)
2. The Key Formula: Force Between Two Magnetic Poles
The force between two magnetic poles of strengths m1 and m2, separated by distance r, is:
F=4πμ0⋅r2m1m2
Why this form?
This is a Coulomb's law analog — and that's not a coincidence. Here's the reasoning:
Experimental observation: Magnetic poles attract/repel with a force that:
Varies as 1/r2 (inverse square law)
Is proportional to the product of pole strengths
Depends on the medium (via μ0, the permeability of free space)
Mathematical analogy: The magnetic field B at distance r from a single pole m is:
B=4πμ0⋅r2m
This comes from Gauss's law for magnetism applied to a point source.
Force derivation: The force on pole m2 in the field of pole m1 is:
F=m2⋅B1=m2⋅(4πμ0⋅r2m1)
Hence:
F=4πμ0⋅r2m1m2
Key insight: The 1/r2 dependence is not arbitrary — it follows from the geometry of 3D space (flux spreads over a sphere of area 4πr2).
3. The Magnetic Field of a Bar Magnet (Two Poles)
For a bar magnet of length 2l with poles +m and −m, the field at a point on the axis at distance x from the center is:
B=4πμ0⋅(x2−l2)22ml
Why this form?
Superposition principle: The total field is the vector sum of fields from the north pole (+m) and south pole (−m).
Field from north pole at distance (x−l):
BN=4πμ0⋅(x−l)2m(away from north)
Field from south pole at distance (x+l):
BS=4πμ0⋅(x+l)2m(toward south)
Net field (both along same direction on axis):
B=BN−BS=4πμ0m[(x−l)21−(x+l)21]
Simplify using algebra:
(x−l)21−(x+l)21=(x2−l2)24xl
Therefore:
B=4πμ0⋅(x2−l2)24mxl
But for a bar magnet, the magnetic moment is M=m⋅(2l) (pole strength × separation). So 2ml=M, giving:
B=4πμ0⋅(x2−l2)22Mx
Key insight: The field is not simply 1/r2 because we have two poles — the net effect is a dipole field, which falls off as 1/r3 at large distances.
4. The Far-Field Approximation (Dipole Formula)
For x≫l (far from the magnet), x2−l2≈x2, so:
B≈4πμ0⋅x32M
Why 1/x3?
A single pole gives 1/r2
Two opposite poles separated by distance d give a dipole — the fields nearly cancel at large distances, leaving a weaker 1/r3 dependence
This is a universal property of dipoles (electric or magnetic)
5. Torque on a Magnetic Dipole in a Uniform Field
τ=MBsinθ
Why this form?
Force on each pole: In uniform field B, north pole feels F=mB along field, south pole feels F=mB opposite field.
Torque calculation: These equal and opposite forces form a couple:
Lever arm = 2lsinθ (perpendicular distance between forces)
Torque = force × lever arm = (mB)×(2lsinθ)
Using magnetic momentM=m⋅2l:
τ=MBsinθ
Key insight: The torque tries to align the magnet with the field — this is why a compass needle points north.
Summary Table: Why Each Formula Has Its Form
Formula
Key Reason
F∝1/r2
Flux spreads over sphere area 4πr2
F∝m1m2
Force is proportional to source strength (linear response)
B∝1/x3 (dipole)
Two opposite poles nearly cancel; residual is dipole field
τ=MBsinθ
Lever arm depends on sinθ in a couple
Remember: Every formula in magnetism is either a Coulomb analog (for poles) or a superposition of such analogs. The 1/r2 law is the foundation — everything else builds on it.
Concept: Magnetic Poles — A magnetic dipole in a uniform field experiences a torque that tries to align it with the field. Stable equilibrium occurs when the dipole is parallel to the field (lowest potential energy), and unstable equilibrium when it is antiparallel (highest potential energy).
Reasoning:
Potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a uniform field: U=−mBcosθ, where θ is the angle between m and B.
For stable equilibrium, U is minimum → cosθ=+1 → θ=0∘ (parallel).
For unstable equilibrium, U is maximum → cosθ=−1 → θ=180∘ (antiparallel).
Compute U: m=0.32J T−1, B=0.15T → mB=0.048J.
✓Final answer
Stable equilibrium at θ=0∘ with U=−0.048J;
unstable equilibrium at θ=180∘ with U=+0.048J.
A magnetic dipole in a uniform field has minimum potential energy (stable equilibrium) when aligned parallel to the field, and maximum potential energy (unstable equilibrium) when anti-parallel. For the given magnet, stable orientation gives U=−0.048J, unstable gives U=+0.048J.
The key idea is that a magnetic dipole — like a bar magnet — in a uniform external field experiences a torque that tries to align it with the field. But the real story is about energy. The potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a uniform field is given by U=−m⋅B=−mBcosθ, where θ is the angle between the magnetic moment vector m and the field B.
Why does this matter for equilibrium? Because nature always seeks the lowest energy state. When the magnet is aligned with the field (θ=0∘), cosθ=1, so U=−mB — the most negative, hence lowest, energy. That’s stable equilibrium: if you nudge it, it will return. When it’s anti-aligned (θ=180∘), cosθ=−1, so U=+mB — the highest energy. That’s unstable: the slightest push sends it spinning toward the stable orientation.
Let’s work through the numbers.
Identify the given data
Magnetic moment, m=0.32J T−1
Magnetic field strength, B=0.15T
The magnet is free to rotate in the plane of the field, so θ can vary from 0∘ to 180∘.
Write the potential energy formula
U=−mBcosθ
Stable equilibrium
This occurs at the minimum of U. Since cosθ is maximum at θ=0∘, we have:
Ustable=−mBcos0∘=−mB
Substitute:
Ustable=−(0.32)(0.15)=−0.048J
The orientation: the magnet’s north pole points in the direction of the external field.
Unstable equilibrium
This occurs at the maximum of U, at θ=180∘:
Uunstable=−mBcos180∘=−mB(−1)=+mB
So:
Uunstable=+0.048J
The orientation: the magnet’s north pole points opposite to the external field.
Watch out
A common mistake is to think that stable equilibrium corresponds to the lowest potential energy magnitude — but energy is signed. −0.048J is lower than +0.048J, so the negative value is indeed the minimum. Don’t drop the sign!
Tip
You can remember this as: “Like poles repel, opposite poles attract.” In stable equilibrium, the magnet’s south pole is closer to the external field’s north pole (attraction), so the system has lower energy. In unstable, like poles face each other (repulsion), giving higher energy.
✓Final answer
The stable equilibrium orientation is parallel to the field with potential energy −0.048J, and the unstable equilibrium orientation is anti-parallel with potential energy +0.048J.
Method: Potential Energy Analysis for a Magnetic Dipole in a Uniform Field
This problem uses the potential energy method for a magnetic dipole in a uniform external field. The key idea: a system is in stable equilibrium when its potential energy is minimum, and in unstable equilibrium when its potential energy is maximum.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1: Recall the potential energy formula
For a magnetic dipole (bar magnet) of magnetic moment m placed in a uniform magnetic field B, the potential energy is:
U=−m⋅B=−mBcosθ
where θ is the angle between m and B.
Step 2: Identify the equilibrium conditions
Stable equilibrium: U is minimum → cosθ is maximum → cosθ=+1 → θ=0∘
(magnetic moment aligned parallel to the field)
Unstable equilibrium: U is maximum → cosθ is minimum → cosθ=−1 → θ=180∘
(magnetic moment anti-parallel to the field)
Step 3: Calculate the potential energies
Given:
m=0.32J T−1
B=0.15T
Stable equilibrium (θ=0∘, cosθ=1):
Ustable=−mBcos0∘=−mB=−(0.32)(0.15)
Ustable=−0.048J
Unstable equilibrium (θ=180∘, cosθ=−1):
Uunstable=−mBcos180∘=−mB(−1)=+mB=(0.32)(0.15)
Uunstable=+0.048J
Final Answer Summary
Equilibrium type
Orientation (θ)
Potential energy
Stable
0∘ (parallel)
−0.048J
Unstable
180∘ (anti-parallel)
+0.048J
Key insight: The negative sign in U=−mBcosθ is crucial — it makes the aligned orientation energetically favourable (lower energy), which is why a freely rotating magnet always settles parallel to the field.
Here are the common mistakes students make on this magnetic poles / torque & potential energy question, and how to avoid each.
Mistake 1: Confusing stable and unstable equilibrium orientations
The error:
Students often think the magnet aligns perpendicular to the field for stable equilibrium, or they swap the two orientations.
Why it happens:
They memorise “stable = minimum energy” but forget the actual angular dependence.
How to avoid:
Stable equilibrium → magnetic moment m is parallel to B (angle θ=0∘).
Unstable equilibrium → m is antiparallel to B (θ=180∘).
Think of a compass needle: it points along the field (stable). Flipping it 180° is unstable — the slightest nudge makes it swing back.
Mistake 2: Using the wrong formula for potential energy
The error:
Using U=−mBcosθ but forgetting the negative sign, or using U=+mBcosθ.
Why it happens:
Misremembering the sign convention.
How to avoid:
The potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a uniform field is:
U=−m⋅B=−mBcosθ
At θ=0∘: cos0=1 → U=−mB (minimum → stable)
At θ=180∘: cos180=−1 → U=+mB (maximum → unstable)
Check: Minimum energy = stable; maximum energy = unstable.
Mistake 3: Forgetting to include units or misreading given data
The error:
Writing U=−0.32×0.15=−0.048 but omitting the unit (Joules), or misreading m as 0.32J T−1 and B as 0.15T.
How to avoid:
Always write the full calculation with units:
Ustable=−mB=−(0.32J T−1)(0.15T)=−0.048J
Uunstable=+mB=+0.048J
Pro tip: In exams, box your final answer with the correct unit.
Mistake 4: Thinking torque is zero only in stable equilibrium
The error:
Stating that torque is zero only for θ=0∘, forgetting θ=180∘ also gives zero torque.
Why it happens:
Torque τ=mBsinθ — students see sin0=0 but forget sin180=0 too.
How to avoid:
Torque is zero at bothθ=0∘ and θ=180∘. The difference is:
θ=0∘ → stable (restoring torque if displaced)
θ=180∘ → unstable (torque away from equilibrium if displaced)
Quick Summary Table
Equilibrium
Orientation
Angle θ
Potential Energy
Stable
m∥B
0∘
U=−mB=−0.048J
Unstable
m∥−B
180∘
U=+mB=+0.048J
Final tip: Draw a quick diagram — arrow for m and arrow for B — before writing the answer. It prevents orientation errors every time.