Q.Evaluate .
The expression is indeterminate at , but factoring the numerator reveals a removable discontinuity; after cancellation the limit equals 6.
When you substitute directly into , both numerator and denominator vanish: you get , which is indeterminate. This signals that the function has a "hole" at rather than being truly undefined everywhere near that point. The key insight is that is a difference of squares, so it factors as . Once we cancel the common factor (valid for all ), the simplified expression reveals what value the function approaches.
Step-by-step evaluation
- Recognize the indeterminate form. Plugging in gives
This tells us we cannot evaluate the limit by direct substitution; algebraic simplification is needed.
- Factor the numerator. The numerator is a difference of squares:
So the original expression becomes
- Cancel the common factor. For every , we can cancel from numerator and denominator:
The limit asks what happens as approaches 3, not at , so this cancellation is legitimate.
- Evaluate the simplified limit. Now
A common mistake is to say "the function is undefined at , so the limit doesn't exist." The limit describes nearby behavior, not the value at the point. The hole at does not prevent the limit from existing.
Whenever you see , look for algebraic simplification—factoring, rationalizing, or expanding—to cancel the troublesome term. Difference of squares, sum/difference of cubes, and conjugate multiplication are your main tools.
The value of the limit is .
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.