Q.Read the following statements – Assertion (A) and Reason (R) carefully. Choose the correct option from those given below : Assertion (A) : Other things remaining constant, devaluation of domestic currency may lead to rise in National Income of the nation. Reason (R) : Devaluation of domestic currency refers to reduction in the value of domestic currency by the government with respect to foreign currency under the fixed exchange rate system. Options : (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The assertion is true: devaluation can boost national income via net exports. The reason is also true: devaluation is a deliberate reduction in currency value under fixed exchange rates. But the reason merely defines devaluation — it does not explain why national income rises. So both are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). The correct option is (B).
Let’s unpack this step by step.
1. Understand the Assertion (A) first.
The claim is: Other things remaining constant, devaluation of domestic currency may lead to a rise in National Income.
Why would that happen? When a country devalues its currency, its exports become cheaper for foreign buyers, and imports become more expensive for domestic residents. This tends to increase export revenue and reduce import spending — so net exports (X – M) rise. Since National Income (Y) = C + I + G + (X – M), a rise in net exports directly increases aggregate demand and thus output and income. So the assertion is economically sound — it’s a standard argument from international trade theory.
A common mistake is to think devaluation always raises income. It can, but only if the Marshall-Lerner condition holds (sum of price elasticities of exports and imports > 1). The assertion says “may lead to”, which is cautious and correct.
2. Now examine the Reason (R).
It says: Devaluation of domestic currency refers to reduction in the value of domestic currency by the government with respect to foreign currency under the fixed exchange rate system.
This is a textbook definition. Under a fixed exchange rate regime, the government or central bank sets the currency’s value. If it deliberately lowers that value, that’s devaluation. (Under floating rates, a similar fall is called depreciation, not devaluation.) So (R) is factually correct.
3. The key question: Does (R) explain (A)? …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.