Q.Given below are two statements, one of which is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R). Read both the statements carefully : Assertion (A) : When an object or body is moving at a constant velocity, with no changes in speed or direction, it is dynamic equilibrium. Reason (R) : A cyclist in motion or the body position maintained by a sprinter on the track while running are examples of dynamic equilibrium. In the context of the above two statements, which one of the following is correct ? (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Both the Assertion and the Reason are true, and the Reason's sporting examples correctly illustrate the Assertion's definition, so the answer is (A).
The idea — dynamic equilibrium in sport
A body is in dynamic equilibrium when it keeps moving at a constant velocity — the same speed in the same direction — so the forces acting on it are balanced and there is no net push to change its motion. It is the moving counterpart of static equilibrium (a body balanced at rest).
Assertion (A)
The Assertion says that when a body moves at constant velocity with no change in speed or direction, it is in dynamic equilibrium. That is the correct definition — constant velocity means balanced forces and steady motion. Assertion is true.
Reason (R)
The Reason offers sporting examples: a cyclist in motion and the body position a sprinter holds while running. A cyclist cruising at a steady speed along a flat track, and a sprinter who has reached and is holding a settled, even stride, are both moving steadily with their forces in balance — genuine examples of dynamic equilibrium. Reason is true.
Does the Reason explain the Assertion? …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.