Skip to content

Mathematics · Ch 4 — Determinants

Adjoint of a Matrix

4.5.1

Adjoint of a Matrix

Adjoint of a Matrix

The adjoint of a matrix is the stepping stone to finding its inverse. It is built directly from the cofactors you have already learned to compute.

Definition of the Adjoint

For a square matrix A=[aij]n×nA = [a_{ij}]_{n \times n}, the adjoint of AA, written as adj A\text{adj } A, is defined as the transpose of the matrix of cofactors.

Let AijA_{ij} be the cofactor of the element aija_{ij}. First, form the cofactor matrix [Aij]n×n[A_{ij}]_{n \times n} — this is a matrix where you replace each element aija_{ij} with its cofactor AijA_{ij}. Then, take the transpose of this cofactor matrix. The result is the adjoint.

adj A=Transpose of [Aij]n×n=[Aji]n×n\text{adj } A = \text{Transpose of } [A_{ij}]_{n \times n} = [A_{ji}]_{n \times n}

Note

The notation [Aji][A_{ji}] means the element in the ii-th row and jj-th column of the adjoint is the cofactor AjiA_{ji} from the original matrix. This swapping of indices is exactly what the transpose does.

Adjoint for a 3×33 \times 3 Matrix

If A=[a11a12a13a21a22a23a31a32a33]A = \begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33} \end{bmatrix}, then the cofactor matrix is [A11A12A13A21A22A23A31A32A33]\begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{12} & A_{13} \\ A_{21} & A_{22} & A_{23} \\ A_{31} & A_{32} & A_{33} \end{bmatrix}.

Taking its transpose gives the adjoint:

adj A=[A11A21A31A12A22A32A13A23A33]\text{adj } A = \begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{21} & A_{31} \\ A_{12} & A_{22} & A_{32} \\ A_{13} & A_{23} & A_{33} \end{bmatrix}

Adjoint for a 2×22 \times 2 Matrix — A Useful Shortcut

For a 2×22 \times 2 matrix A=[a11a12a21a22]A = \begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} \end{bmatrix}, the cofactors are:

  • A11=a22A_{11} = a_{22}
  • A12=−a21A_{12} = -a_{21}
  • A21=−a12A_{21} = -a_{12}
  • A22=a11A_{22} = a_{11}

The cofactor matrix is [a22−a21−a12a11]\begin{bmatrix} a_{22} & -a_{21} \\ -a_{12} & a_{11} \end{bmatrix}. Transposing it gives the adjoint:

adj A=[a22−a12−a21a11]\text{adj } A = \begin{bmatrix} a_{22} & -a_{12} \\ -a_{21} & a_{11} \end{bmatrix}

Tip

For a 2×22 \times 2 matrix, you can find the adjoint directly without computing cofactors: swap the diagonal elements a11a_{11} and a22a_{22}, and change the signs of the off-diagonal elements a12a_{12} and a21a_{21}.


Theorem 1: The Fundamental Adjoint-Product Relation

Important

For any square matrix AA of order nn,

A(adj A)=(adj A)A=∣A∣IA(\text{adj } A) = (\text{adj } A)A = |A| I

where II is the identity matrix of order nn.

›Proof

Verification for a 3×33 \times 3 matrix

Let A=[a11a12a13a21a22a23a31a32a33]A = \begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33} \end{bmatrix} and adj A=[A11A21A31A12A22A32A13A23A33]\text{adj } A = \begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{21} & A_{31} \\ A_{12} & A_{22} & A_{32} \\ A_{13} & A_{23} & A_{33} \end{bmatrix}.

Consider the product A(adj A)A(\text{adj } A). The element in the ii-th row and jj-th column of this product is:

ai1Aj1+ai2Aj2+ai3Aj3a_{i1}A_{j1} + a_{i2}A_{j2} + a_{i3}A_{j3}

This is the sum of the products of elements of the ii-th row of AA with the cofactors of the jj-th row of AA.

Case 1: i=ji = j

The sum becomes ai1Ai1+ai2Ai2+ai3Ai3a_{i1}A_{i1} + a_{i2}A_{i2} + a_{i3}A_{i3}, which is exactly the expansion of ∣A∣|A| along the ii-th row. So each diagonal entry equals ∣A∣|A|.

Case 2: i≠ji \neq j

The sum becomes ai1Aj1+ai2Aj2+ai3Aj3a_{i1}A_{j1} + a_{i2}A_{j2} + a_{i3}A_{j3}. This is the sum of products of elements of the ii-th row with the cofactors of a different row jj. By a property of determinants, this sum is zero.

Therefore,

A(adj A)=[∣A∣000∣A∣000∣A∣]=∣A∣[100010001]=∣A∣IA(\text{adj } A) = \begin{bmatrix} |A| & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & |A| & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & |A| \end{bmatrix} = |A| \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = |A| I

The same reasoning applied to (adj A)A(\text{adj } A)A (using columns instead of rows) gives the same result.


Singular and Non-Singular Matrices

These definitions classify matrices based on whether their determinant is zero.

Definition 4 — Singular Matrix: A square matrix AA is called singular if ∣A∣=0|A| = 0.

Example: A=[1248]A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 4 & 8 \end{bmatrix}. Here ∣A∣=1(8)−2(4)=8−8=0|A| = 1(8) - 2(4) = 8 - 8 = 0, so AA is singular.

Definition 5 — Non-Singular Matrix: A square matrix AA is called non-singular if ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0.

Example: A=[1234]A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4 \end{bmatrix}. Here ∣A∣=1(4)−2(3)=4−6=−2≠0|A| = 1(4) - 2(3) = 4 - 6 = -2 \neq 0, so AA is non-singular.


Theorem 2 and Theorem 3 (Stated Without Proof)

Theorem 2: If AA and BB are non-singular matrices of the same order, then ABAB and BABA are also non-singular matrices of the same order.

Theorem 3: The determinant of the product of matrices equals the product of their determinants:

∣AB∣=∣A∣ ∣B∣|AB| = |A| \, |B|

where AA and BB are square matrices of the same order.


Determinant of the Adjoint

From Theorem 1, we have A(adj A)=∣A∣IA(\text{adj } A) = |A| I. Taking determinants on both sides:

∣A(adj A)∣=∣∣A∣I∣|A(\text{adj } A)| = \big| |A| I \big|

Using Theorem 3 on the left: ∣A∣ ∣adj A∣=∣∣A∣I∣|A| \, |\text{adj } A| = \big| |A| I \big|

For a 3×33 \times 3 matrix, ∣A∣I=[∣A∣000∣A∣000∣A∣]|A| I = \begin{bmatrix} |A| & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & |A| & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & |A| \end{bmatrix}. The determinant of this diagonal matrix is ∣A∣3|A|^3.

Therefore: ∣A∣ ∣adj A∣=∣A∣3|A| \, |\text{adj } A| = |A|^3

If ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0, we can divide both sides by ∣A∣|A| to get:

∣adj A∣=∣A∣2|\text{adj } A| = |A|^2

For a square matrix AA of order nn,

∣adj A∣=∣A∣n−1|\text{adj } A| = |A|^{n-1}


Theorem 4: Condition for Invertibility

Important

A square matrix AA is invertible if and only if AA is non-singular (i.e., ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0).

›Proof

Part 1: If AA is invertible, then AA is non-singular.

Since AA is invertible, there exists a matrix BB such that AB=BA=IAB = BA = I.

Taking determinants: ∣AB∣=∣I∣|AB| = |I| …

Definition 3Adjoint of a Matrix

Definition: Adjoint of a Matrix

For a square matrix A=[aij]n×nA = [a_{ij}]_{n \times n}, the adjoint (denoted adj A\text{adj } A) is defined as the transpose of the cofactor matrix of AA.

That is:

  1. First, find the cofactor AijA_{ij} for each element aija_{ij} of AA.
  2. Arrange all these cofactors into a matrix [Aij]n×n[A_{ij}]_{n \times n} (the cofactor matrix).
  3. Then, take the transpose of this cofactor matrix. The result is adj A\text{adj } A.

In symbols:

adj A=([Aij]n×n)T\text{adj } A = \big( [A_{ij}]_{n \times n} \big)^T

For a 3×33 \times 3 matrix:

A=[a11a12a13a21a22a23a31a32a33]A = \begin{bmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \\ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33} \end{bmatrix}

the adjoint is:

adj A=[A11A21A31A12A22A32A13A23A33]\text{adj } A = \begin{bmatrix} A_{11} & A_{21} & A_{31} \\ A_{12} & A_{22} & A_{32} \\ A_{13} & A_{23} & A_{33} \end{bmatrix}


Intuition

The adjoint is a way to "package" all the cofactors of a matrix so that when multiplied by the original matrix, the result is a scalar (the determinant) times the identity matrix. This makes the adjoint a key step in finding the inverse of a matrix.


Concrete Example (for a 2×22 \times 2 matrix)

Let:

A=[2314]A = \begin{bmatrix} 2 & 3 \\ 1 & 4 \end{bmatrix}

Cofactors:

  • A11=4A_{11} = 4
  • A12=−1A_{12} = -1
  • A21=−3A_{21} = -3
  • A22=2A_{22} = 2

Cofactor matrix:

[4−1−32]\begin{bmatrix} 4 & -1 \\ -3 & 2 \end{bmatrix}

Transpose to get adjoint: …

Definition 4Singular

Definition

A square matrix AA is called singular if its determinant is zero:

∣A∣=0|A| = 0

Intuition

A singular matrix has no inverse — it "collapses" space, losing information. You cannot reverse its effect.

Example

For

A=[1248]A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 4 & 8 \end{bmatrix}

the determinant is …

Definition 5Non-singular

Definition

A square matrix AA is called non-singular if its determinant is not zero.

In symbols:

AA is non-singular   ⟺  ∣A∣≠0\iff |A| \neq 0.

This is Definition 5 from the textbook. It is the exact opposite of a singular matrix, which has ∣A∣=0|A| = 0.


Intuition

Think of the determinant as a "scale factor" or a "test of invertibility."

If ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0, the matrix has a unique inverse — it can "undo" its own transformation.

If ∣A∣=0|A| = 0, the matrix collapses space (loses information) and cannot be reversed.


Concrete Example

Let …

Theorem 1

Theorem 4: Invertibility and Non-Singularity

A square matrix AA is invertible if and only if AA is non-singular.

A is invertible  ⟺  ∣A∣≠0A \text{ is invertible} \iff |A| \neq 0

What This Means

The theorem gives us a clean, practical test for whether a matrix has an inverse. Instead of searching for some matrix BB such that AB=IAB = I, we simply compute the determinant. If it is zero, the matrix is singular and has no inverse. If it is non-zero, the matrix is non-singular and an inverse exists — and we even have a formula for it.

The Two Key Definitions

Before we prove the theorem, recall two definitions from the textbook:

  • Singular matrix: A square matrix AA is singular if ∣A∣=0|A| = 0.
  • Non-singular matrix: A square matrix AA is non-singular if ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0.
Watch out

A common mistake is to confuse "singular" with "invertible". They are opposites: singular means no inverse exists; non-singular means an inverse does exist.

The Complete Proof

›Proof

We must prove two directions: (1) if AA is invertible, then AA is non-singular; (2) if AA is non-singular, then AA is invertible.

Forward direction (invertible ⇒\Rightarrow non-singular)

Suppose AA is an invertible matrix of order nn. Then there exists a square matrix BB of order nn such that

AB=BA=IAB = BA = I

where II is the identity matrix of order nn.

Take determinants on both sides of AB=IAB = I:

∣AB∣=∣I∣|AB| = |I|

By Theorem 3 (the determinant of a product equals the product of determinants), we have

∣A∣ ∣B∣=1|A|\,|B| = 1

Since ∣I∣=1|I| = 1 for any identity matrix. Now ∣A∣ ∣B∣=1|A|\,|B| = 1 implies ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0 (if ∣A∣|A| were zero, the product would be zero, not 1). Therefore AA is non-singular.

Backward direction (non-singular ⇒\Rightarrow invertible)

Suppose AA is non-singular, so ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0. From Theorem 1, we know that for any square matrix AA,

A(adj A)=(adj A)A=∣A∣ IA(\text{adj }A) = (\text{adj }A)A = |A|\,I

Since ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0, we can divide both sides by ∣A∣|A|:

A(1∣A∣adj A)=(1∣A∣adj A)A=IA\left(\frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A\right) = \left(\frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A\right)A = I

Define B=1∣A∣adj AB = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A. Then AB=BA=IAB = BA = I, which means BB is the inverse of AA. Hence AA is invertible, and moreover

A−1=1∣A∣adj AA^{-1} = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A

This completes the proof.

Note

The proof gives us more than just the theorem — it provides the explicit formula for the inverse: A−1=1∣A∣adj AA^{-1} = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A. This is the method you will use to compute inverses for 2×22 \times 2 and 3×33 \times 3 matrices.

When to Use This Theorem

You use this theorem whenever you need to decide whether a matrix has an inverse. The procedure is simple: …

Theorem 2

Theorem 4: Invertibility and Non-Singularity

A square matrix AA is invertible if and only if AA is non-singular.

A is invertible  ⟺  ∣A∣≠0A \text{ is invertible} \iff |A| \neq 0

What This Means

The theorem gives us a clean, practical test for whether a matrix has an inverse. Instead of searching for some matrix BB such that AB=IAB = I, we simply compute the determinant. If it is zero, the matrix is singular and has no inverse. If it is non-zero, the matrix is non-singular and an inverse exists — and we even have a formula for it.

The Two Key Definitions

Before we prove the theorem, recall two definitions from the textbook:

  • Singular matrix: A square matrix AA is singular if ∣A∣=0|A| = 0.
  • Non-singular matrix: A square matrix AA is non-singular if ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0.
Watch out

A common mistake is to confuse "singular" with "invertible". They are opposites: singular means no inverse exists; non-singular means an inverse does exist.

The Complete Proof

›Proof

We must prove two directions: (1) if AA is invertible, then AA is non-singular; (2) if AA is non-singular, then AA is invertible.

Forward direction (invertible ⇒\Rightarrow non-singular)

Suppose AA is an invertible matrix of order nn. Then there exists a square matrix BB of order nn such that

AB=BA=IAB = BA = I

where II is the identity matrix of order nn.

Take determinants on both sides of AB=IAB = I:

∣AB∣=∣I∣|AB| = |I|

By Theorem 3 (the determinant of a product equals the product of determinants), we have

∣A∣ ∣B∣=1|A|\,|B| = 1

Since ∣I∣=1|I| = 1 for any identity matrix. Now ∣A∣ ∣B∣=1|A|\,|B| = 1 implies ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0 (if ∣A∣|A| were zero, the product would be zero, not 1). Therefore AA is non-singular.

Backward direction (non-singular ⇒\Rightarrow invertible)

Suppose AA is non-singular, so ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0. From Theorem 1, we know that for any square matrix AA,

A(adj A)=(adj A)A=∣A∣ IA(\text{adj }A) = (\text{adj }A)A = |A|\,I

Since ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0, we can divide both sides by ∣A∣|A|:

A(1∣A∣adj A)=(1∣A∣adj A)A=IA\left(\frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A\right) = \left(\frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A\right)A = I

Define B=1∣A∣adj AB = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A. Then AB=BA=IAB = BA = I, which means BB is the inverse of AA. Hence AA is invertible, and moreover

A−1=1∣A∣adj AA^{-1} = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A

This completes the proof.

Note

The proof gives us more than just the theorem — it provides the explicit formula for the inverse: A−1=1∣A∣adj AA^{-1} = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A. This is the method you will use to compute inverses for 2×22 \times 2 and 3×33 \times 3 matrices.

When to Use This Theorem

You use this theorem whenever you need to decide whether a matrix has an inverse. The procedure is simple: …

Theorem 3

Theorem 4: Invertibility and Non-Singularity

A square matrix AA is invertible if and only if AA is non-singular.

A is invertible  ⟺  ∣A∣≠0A \text{ is invertible} \iff |A| \neq 0

What This Means

The theorem gives us a clean, practical test for whether a matrix has an inverse. Instead of searching for some matrix BB such that AB=IAB = I, we simply compute the determinant. If it is zero, the matrix is singular and has no inverse. If it is non-zero, the matrix is non-singular and an inverse exists — and we even have a formula for it.

The Two Key Definitions

Before we prove the theorem, recall two definitions from the textbook:

  • Singular matrix: A square matrix AA is singular if ∣A∣=0|A| = 0.
  • Non-singular matrix: A square matrix AA is non-singular if ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0.
Watch out

A common mistake is to confuse "singular" with "invertible". They are opposites: singular means no inverse exists; non-singular means an inverse does exist.

The Complete Proof

›Proof

We must prove two directions: (1) if AA is invertible, then AA is non-singular; (2) if AA is non-singular, then AA is invertible.

Forward direction (invertible ⇒\Rightarrow non-singular)

Suppose AA is an invertible matrix of order nn. Then there exists a square matrix BB of order nn such that

AB=BA=IAB = BA = I

where II is the identity matrix of order nn.

Take determinants on both sides of AB=IAB = I:

∣AB∣=∣I∣|AB| = |I|

By Theorem 3 (the determinant of a product equals the product of determinants), we have

∣A∣ ∣B∣=1|A|\,|B| = 1

Since ∣I∣=1|I| = 1 for any identity matrix. Now ∣A∣ ∣B∣=1|A|\,|B| = 1 implies ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0 (if ∣A∣|A| were zero, the product would be zero, not 1). Therefore AA is non-singular.

Backward direction (non-singular ⇒\Rightarrow invertible)

Suppose AA is non-singular, so ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0. From Theorem 1, we know that for any square matrix AA,

A(adj A)=(adj A)A=∣A∣ IA(\text{adj }A) = (\text{adj }A)A = |A|\,I

Since ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0, we can divide both sides by ∣A∣|A|:

A(1∣A∣adj A)=(1∣A∣adj A)A=IA\left(\frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A\right) = \left(\frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A\right)A = I

Define B=1∣A∣adj AB = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A. Then AB=BA=IAB = BA = I, which means BB is the inverse of AA. Hence AA is invertible, and moreover

A−1=1∣A∣adj AA^{-1} = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A

This completes the proof.

Note

The proof gives us more than just the theorem — it provides the explicit formula for the inverse: A−1=1∣A∣adj AA^{-1} = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A. This is the method you will use to compute inverses for 2×22 \times 2 and 3×33 \times 3 matrices.

When to Use This Theorem

You use this theorem whenever you need to decide whether a matrix has an inverse. The procedure is simple: …

Theorem 4

Theorem 4: Invertibility and Non-Singularity

A square matrix AA is invertible if and only if AA is non-singular.

A is invertible  ⟺  ∣A∣≠0A \text{ is invertible} \iff |A| \neq 0

What This Means

The theorem gives us a clean, practical test for whether a matrix has an inverse. Instead of searching for some matrix BB such that AB=IAB = I, we simply compute the determinant. If it is zero, the matrix is singular and has no inverse. If it is non-zero, the matrix is non-singular and an inverse exists — and we even have a formula for it.

The Two Key Definitions

Before we prove the theorem, recall two definitions from the textbook:

  • Singular matrix: A square matrix AA is singular if ∣A∣=0|A| = 0.
  • Non-singular matrix: A square matrix AA is non-singular if ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0.
Watch out

A common mistake is to confuse "singular" with "invertible". They are opposites: singular means no inverse exists; non-singular means an inverse does exist.

The Complete Proof

›Proof

We must prove two directions: (1) if AA is invertible, then AA is non-singular; (2) if AA is non-singular, then AA is invertible.

Forward direction (invertible ⇒\Rightarrow non-singular)

Suppose AA is an invertible matrix of order nn. Then there exists a square matrix BB of order nn such that

AB=BA=IAB = BA = I

where II is the identity matrix of order nn.

Take determinants on both sides of AB=IAB = I:

∣AB∣=∣I∣|AB| = |I|

By Theorem 3 (the determinant of a product equals the product of determinants), we have

∣A∣ ∣B∣=1|A|\,|B| = 1

Since ∣I∣=1|I| = 1 for any identity matrix. Now ∣A∣ ∣B∣=1|A|\,|B| = 1 implies ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0 (if ∣A∣|A| were zero, the product would be zero, not 1). Therefore AA is non-singular.

Backward direction (non-singular ⇒\Rightarrow invertible)

Suppose AA is non-singular, so ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0. From Theorem 1, we know that for any square matrix AA,

A(adj A)=(adj A)A=∣A∣ IA(\text{adj }A) = (\text{adj }A)A = |A|\,I

Since ∣A∣≠0|A| \neq 0, we can divide both sides by ∣A∣|A|:

A(1∣A∣adj A)=(1∣A∣adj A)A=IA\left(\frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A\right) = \left(\frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A\right)A = I

Define B=1∣A∣adj AB = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A. Then AB=BA=IAB = BA = I, which means BB is the inverse of AA. Hence AA is invertible, and moreover

A−1=1∣A∣adj AA^{-1} = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A

This completes the proof.

Note

The proof gives us more than just the theorem — it provides the explicit formula for the inverse: A−1=1∣A∣adj AA^{-1} = \frac{1}{|A|}\text{adj }A. This is the method you will use to compute inverses for 2×22 \times 2 and 3×33 \times 3 matrices.

When to Use This Theorem

You use this theorem whenever you need to decide whether a matrix has an inverse. The procedure is simple: …