Using the following short-run cost schedule for a firm with :
| Q | TFC | TVC | TC | AFC | AVC | ATC | MC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | 40 | 100 | 60 | 40 | 100 | 40 |
| 2 | 60 | 70 | 130 | 30 | 35 | 65 | 30 |
| 3 | 60 | 90 | 150 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 20 |
| 4 | 60 | 100 | 160 | 15 | 25 | 40 | 10 |
| 5 | 60 | 120 | 180 | 12 | 24 | 36 | 20 |
| 6 | 60 | 150 | 210 | 10 | 25 | 35 | 30 |
| 7 | 60 | 200 | 260 | 8.57 | 28.57 | 37.14 | 50 |
identify (a) the output at which AVC is at its minimum, (b) the output at which ATC is at its minimum, and (c) explain in your own words why MC must equal AVC and ATC exactly at their respective minimum points.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →(a) Scanning the AVC column — 40, 35, 30, 25, 24, 25, 28.57 — the smallest value is Rs. 24, at Q = 5; AVC falls up to Q = 5 and rises from Q = 6 onward.
(b) Scanning the ATC column — 100, 65, 50, 40, 36, 35, 37.14 — the smallest value is Rs. 35, at Q = 6; ATC falls up to Q = 6 and rises from Q = 7 onward. Notice ATC's minimum (Q = 6) occurs one unit AFTER AVC's minimum (Q = 5), because AFC (60, 30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 8.57) is still falling at Q = 6, pulling ATC down a little further even though AVC has already turned upward. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.