Chemistry · Ch 4 — Transition and Inner Transition Elements
Variation of Atomic and Ionic Size
Variation of Atomic and Ionic Size
The generally expected pattern across any period of the periodic table is a steady decrease in atomic radius as one moves left to right, driven by the rising nuclear charge pulling the (constant-shell) electron cloud progressively inward. The 3d transition series follows this expectation only for its first few members: the anticipated decrease in atomic radius is indeed observed moving from scandium to vanadium. But thereafter, from vanadium all the way through to copper, the atomic radius levels off and remains nearly constant rather than continuing to shrink.
The explanation lies in a tug-of-war between two competing effects as electrons are added to the 3d sub-shell moving across the series. On one hand, the added 3d electrons only partially shield the increasing nuclear charge from the outer 4s electrons (d electrons are relatively poor shields compared with s or p electrons in the same or an outer shell), so the effective nuclear charge experienced by the valence electrons rises slightly as atomic number increases. On the other hand, those same additional 3d electrons strongly repel the 4s electrons that sit further out, an effect that tends to push the atom's outer boundary outward. These two forces -- the slowly rising effective nuclear charge pulling inward, and the growing 3d-4s electron repulsion pushing outward -- operate in opposite directions and, across most of the series, very nearly cancel each other out, producing the observed near-constancy in atomic radii from V through Cu.
At the very end of the series, at zinc, the d-orbitals hold their full complement of 10 electrons. Here, the mutual repulsive interaction among these ten d electrons outweighs the (by-now only modestly higher) effective nuclear charge, so the d-orbitals slightly expand and the atomic radius correspondingly increases a little at zinc relative to its immediate neighbours -- the small uptick visible at the right-hand end of Figure 4.4(a). …
What this figure shows. A line graph of atomic radius (Å, y-axis, 1.5-2.5) against atomic number for the ten 3d elements Sc through Zn. The plot starts high at Sc (~2.14 Å), falls through Ti and V, then stays almost flat across Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni and Cu (all clustered near 1.9-2.0 Å) before ticking back up slightly at Zn -- visually confirming the text's claim of an initial decrease followed by near-constancy and a sm …
What this figure shows. A line graph of atomic radius (Å, y-axis, 1.5-2.5) against atomic number for the ten 4d elements Y through Cd. The curve starts highest at Y (~2.3 Å), decreases steadily through Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pd and Ag (levelling out near 2.1 Å in the middle-to-late elements), then rises again at Cd -- each 4d element sitting visibly above its corresponding 3d element on the previous graph, since electrons are now being added to the larger 4d su …
What this figure shows. A line graph of atomic radius (Å, y-axis, 1.5-2.5) against atomic number for the ten 5d elements Lu, Hf through Hg. The curve again starts high, dips through the middle elements (Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt clustering near 2.1-2.2 Å) and rises at Au/Hg -- but unlike the 4d-vs-3d comparison, this curve sits almost on top of the 4d curve rather than clearly above it, because lanthanoid contraction (covered later in section 4.5.4) has shrunk the expected s …