let Δ=a11a21a31a12a22a32a13a23a33=0. Then
x1=ΔΔ1,x2=ΔΔ2,x3=ΔΔ3,
where Δk is Δ with column k replaced by the constants b1,b2,b3 (columns =k unchanged). The same pattern gives x=Δ1/Δ,y=Δ2/Δ for a two-equation, two-unknown system.
Derivation idea for x1.x1Δ equals Δ with its first column scaled by x1; using the original equations, that scaled column (a11x1,a21x1,a31x1) can be rewritten as bi−ai2x2−ai3x3; splitting the determinant by that sum and discarding the two pieces that repeat columns 2 or 3 (hence vanish) leaves exactly Δ1 -- so x1Δ=Δ1, and dividing by Δ=0 gives the rule. x2,x3 follow identically.
Worked illustration. Solve x1−x2=3,2x1+3x2+4x3=17,x2+2x3=7. Δ=120−131042=6=0; Δ1=3177−131042=12; Δ2=1203177042=−6; Δ3=120−1313177=24. So x1=12/6=2,x2=−6/6=−1,x3=24/6=4.
Word problems. A path y=ax2+bx+c through three known points, or a scoring/rate/mixture problem, gives a 3×3 system in the unknown constants exactly as for matrix inversion; Cramer's rule is convenient here since each unknown is found independently, without computing a full inverse. …