Physics · Ch 6 — Optics
Interference in Thin Films
Interference in Thin Films
A thin transparent film of refractive index and thickness , struck by a parallel beam at (near-)normal incidence, splits the light at its upper surface into a reflected part and a refracted part; the refracted part is further partly reflected at the lower surface and re-emerges through the top -- so both the reflected and the transmitted light consist of multiple coherent contributions that can interfere, producing colour in soap films and oil slicks. For the extra optical path travelled inside the film (near-normal incidence), the transmitted light interferes constructively when and destructively when . The reflected light picks up an extra phase shift of (equivalent to an extra path ) whenever reflection happens while travelling from a rarer into a denser medium, so its conditions are reversed relative to transmission: constructive reflection requires , i.e. , and destructive reflection requires . For a general (non-normal) angle of incidence with internal refraction angle , every occurrence of above is replaced by . T …
What this figure shows. A thin transparent film, thickness d and refractive index mu, is struck by a ray at angle i; at the upper surface it splits into a reflected ray and a refracted ray that enters the film. That refracted ray reaches the lower surface and there splits again -- part transmitted onward out of the film, part reflected back up through the film and out through the top surface a second time. The two rays leaving the top surface (the original direct reflection, and the twice-refracted-once-internally-reflected ray) are coherent and interfere, as are the two rays eventually leaving through the bottom of the film; multiplying reflections inside a real film add further, pro …
Worked out. A film of refractive index 1.25 is to strongly reflect light of wavelength 589 nm. For strong (constructive) reflection, the least optical path difference of lambda/2 requires 2(mu)d = lambda/2, giving d = lambda/(4 mu) = 589e-9/(4 times 1.25) = 117.8e-9 m = 117.8 nm, the minimum thickness for a highly-reflective coating. For the same film to instead be anti-reflecting, destructive reflection requires the larger path difference 2(mu)d = lambda, giving d = lambda/(2 mu) = 589e-9/(2 times 1.25) = 235.6e-9 m = 235.6 nm -- exactly double the strong-reflection thickness, since anti-reflection coatings must instead cancel, rather than reinf …