Q.In Dumas' method for estimation of nitrogen, 0.3 g of an organic compound gave 50 mL of nitrogen collected at 300 K temperature and 715 mm pressure. Calculate the percentage composition of nitrogen in the compound. (Aqueous tension at 300 K = 15 mm)
Concept understanding — Carbon Dioxide Absorption
Carbon Dioxide Absorption — The Intuition
Imagine you're holding a glass of cold water on a hot day. After a few minutes, you notice tiny bubbles forming on the inside of the glass. Those bubbles aren't coming from the water itself — they're carbon dioxide gas from the air, dissolving into the water. That's absorption in action: a gas (CO₂) entering a liquid (water) and becoming part of it.
Now scale that up. The oceans, lakes, and even the moisture in soil are constantly doing the same thing on a massive scale. CO₂ from the atmosphere dissolves into water bodies. But here's the twist — once dissolved, CO₂ doesn't just sit there as a gas. It reacts chemically with water, turning into something else entirely.
The Precise Chemistry
When carbon dioxide gas meets water, two things happen in sequence:
Step 1 — Physical dissolution:
CO₂ (gas) simply enters the water and becomes aqueous CO₂.
CO2(g)⇌CO2(aq)
Step 2 — Chemical reaction:
The dissolved CO₂ reacts with water to form carbonic acid, a weak acid.
CO2(aq)+H2O(l)⇌H2CO3(aq)
This carbonic acid then quickly dissociates (splits) into ions:
H2CO3(aq)⇌H+(aq)+HCO3−(aq)
And a tiny fraction of bicarbonate further dissociates:
HCO3−(aq)⇌H+(aq)+CO32−(aq)
The overall absorption process is reversible. The double arrows (⇌) mean the reaction can go forward or backward depending on conditions. If the air has less CO₂, the dissolved CO₂ can escape back into the atmosphere.
Why This Matters
This isn't just a chemistry curiosity. CO₂ absorption by oceans is the Earth's largest natural carbon sink — it absorbs about 25-30% of all CO₂ humans emit. Without it, atmospheric CO₂ levels would be much higher.
But there's a catch. As we pump more CO₂ into the air, oceans absorb more, producing more carbonic acid. This ocean acidification makes seawater more acidic (lower pH), harming marine life — especially organisms with calcium carbonate shells (corals, shellfish, plankton).
Don't confuse absorption (gas entering a liquid) with adsorption (gas sticking to a solid surface). They sound similar but are completely different processes. Absorption is like a sponge soaking up water; adsorption is like dust sticking to a wall.
The Big Picture
Think of CO₂ absorption as a chemical buffer system. The ocean doesn't just store CO₂ — it transforms it. The equilibrium between CO₂ gas, carbonic acid, bicarbonate, and carbonate ions keeps the ocean's pH relatively stable. But that stability has limits. When you push the system too hard (too much CO₂), the pH drops, and the consequences ripple through the entire marine food web.
So next time you see bubbles in a cold drink, remember: you're watching the same chemistry that shapes our planet's climate and oceans.
A frequent student search pattern for this topic is "Carbon Dioxide Absorption important questions", "Carbon Dioxide Absorption: Definition & Examples", or "NCERT chemistry syllabus carbon dioxide absorption". This is a foundational, NCERT-aligned topic within the CBSE senior secondary Chemistry curriculum, useful groundwork for board-exam revision and broader competitive-exam prep.
Concept: In Dumas' method the nitrogen is collected over an aqueous (KOH) solution, so the measured pressure includes the aqueous tension. Correct for it, reduce the volume to STP, then use 22400 mL N2 at STP = 28 g.
Step 1 — correct the pressure: pN2=715−15=700 mm.
Step 2 — volume at STP: VSTP=300×760700×50×273=41.9 mL.
Step 3 — percentage: %N=22400×0.328×41.9×100=17.46%.
The percentage of nitrogen in the compound is 17.46 %.
The nitrogen in Dumas' method is measured over an aqueous solution, so we first subtract the aqueous tension, then reduce the gas volume to STP and use the fact that 22400 mL of N2 at STP weighs 28 g. This gives 17.46 % nitrogen.
Why Dumas' Method Works
A nitrogen-containing organic compound heated with copper(II) oxide in a stream of CO2 liberates its nitrogen as free N2 gas, which is collected over a KOH/water solution. Because the gas stands over water it is saturated with water vapour, so the measured pressure includes the aqueous tension (water-vapour pressure); this must be subtracted to obtain the true pressure of nitrogen.
Step-by-Step Solution
1. Correct for aqueous tension.
pN2=715−15=700 mm
2. Reduce the volume of nitrogen to STP. Using T1P1V1=T0P0V0 with P0=760 mm and T0=273 K,
VSTP=T1P0P1V1T0=300×760700×50×273=41.9 mL
3. Mass of nitrogen. 22400 mL of N2 at STP weighs 28 g, so 41.9 mL weighs
2240028×41.9=0.0524 g
4. Percentage of nitrogen.
%N=2240028×41.9×0.3100=22400×0.328×41.9×100=17.46%
The most common slip is to skip the aqueous-tension correction (using 715 mm instead of 700 mm) or to forget to reduce the volume to STP — always subtract the water-vapour pressure first, then convert to STP.
The percentage of nitrogen in the compound is 17.46 %.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.An organic compound contains 69.4% C, 5.8% H, x % N and y % O. A sample of 0.30 g of this compound was analyzed for nitrogen by Kjeldahl’s method. The ammonia evolved was absorbed in 50 mL of 0.05 M H2SO4. The excess acid required 25 mL of 0.1 M NaOH for neutralization. The empirical formula of the compound is (A) C3H3NO (B) C6H6N2O (C) C7H7NO (D) C8H7N2O
›Reveal solutionSolution
The nitrogen percentage is found from the Kjeldahl titration, then the oxygen percentage is deduced by difference; the mole ratios give the empirical formula C₇H₇NO, which matches option (C).
Concept & Intuition
We have two separate pieces of information: the combustion percentages (C, H, N, O) and a Kjeldahl titration that tells us the exact nitrogen content. The trick is that the percentages must add to 100%, so once we find N% from the titration, O% = 100 – (C% + H% + N%). Then we convert each percentage to moles of atoms, find the simplest whole‑number ratio, and match it to the given options.
Step‑by‑step reasoning
- Find the moles of NH₃ (and thus N) from the Kjeldahl titration
- The ammonia evolved is absorbed in 50 mL of 0.05 M H₂SO₄. Moles of H₂SO₄ taken = 0.050L×0.05mol/L=0.0025mol.
- Each mole of H₂SO₄ neutralizes 2 moles of NH₃:
H2SO4+2NH3→(NH4)2SO4
- The excess H₂SO₄ is titrated with 25 mL of 0.1 M NaOH. Moles of NaOH used = 0.025L×0.1mol/L=0.0025mol. Since 2 NaOH neutralize 1 H₂SO₄, moles of excess H₂SO₄ = 0.0025/2=0.00125mol.
- Therefore, moles of H₂SO₄ that reacted with NH₃ = 0.0025−0.00125=0.00125mol.
- Moles of NH₃ produced = 2×0.00125=0.0025mol.
- Each mole of NH₃ contains 1 mole of N, so moles of N in the 0.30 g sample = 0.0025 mol.
- Calculate the percentage of nitrogen in the compound
%N=mass of samplemass of N×100=0.300.0025×14×100
=0.300.035×100=11.67%
So x=11.67%.
- Find the oxygen percentage by difference Total = 100% = 69.4% C + 5.8% H + 11.67% N + y% O
y=100−(69.4+5.8+11.67)=100−86.87=13.13%
-
Convert percentages to moles of atoms per 100 g of compound
- Moles of C = 1269.4=5.783
- Moles of H = 15.8=5.8
- Moles of N = 1411.67=0.8336
- Moles of O = 1613.13=0.8206
-
Find the simplest whole‑number ratio
Divide each by the smallest number (≈0.8206):
- C: 5.783/0.8206≈7.05 → 7
- H: 5.8/0.8206≈7.07 → 7
- N: 0.8336/0.8206≈1.016 → 1
- O: 0.8206/0.8206=1 → 1
The ratio is C₇H₇NO.
-
Match with the options
Option (C) is C₇H₇NO.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that each H₂SO₄ neutralizes two NH₃ molecules, leading to a wrong nitrogen count. Always check the stoichiometry of the absorption reaction.
TipThe mole ratios came out extremely close to integers (7, 7, 1, 1), confirming the empirical formula is exact — no rounding ambiguity.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- Find the moles of NH₃ (and thus N) from the Kjeldahl titration
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-05-FN1 markMCQQ.When 160 g of methane was burnt in air at STP, 5% of it remained. At 273 K and 1 bar pressure, air contains 20% of O2 by volume. What is the approximate volume (in L) of air consumed? (At STP molar volume = 22.71 L) (A) 2157.45 (B) 215.74 (C) 21574.5 (D) 431.49
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to find the mass of methane actually burnt, write the combustion equation, calculate the moles of O₂ required, then use the molar volume and the 20% oxygen composition of air to find the volume of air consumed. The approximate volume is 2157.45 L.
-
Find the mass of methane actually burnt.
You start with 160 g of methane, but 5% remains unburnt. That means only 95% of it participates in the reaction.
Mass burnt = 160×10095=152 g.
-
Convert that mass to moles of methane.
Molar mass of CH₄ = 12+4×1=16 g/mol.
Moles of CH₄ burnt = 16152=9.5 mol.
-
Write the balanced combustion reaction.
Methane burns in oxygen:
CH4+2O2→CO2+2H2O
From the stoichiometry, 1 mole of CH₄ requires 2 moles of O₂.
So, moles of O₂ needed = 9.5×2=19 mol.
- Find the volume of O₂ at STP. At STP (273 K, 1 bar), the molar volume is given as 22.71 L/mol. Volume of O₂ = 19×22.71=431.49 L.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that only 95% of the methane burns. Using the full 160 g gives 10 mol of CH₄, leading to 20 mol O₂ and a volume of 454.2 L — which is not among the options, but close to option (D). That’s a trap.
- Relate O₂ volume to air volume. Air contains 20% O₂ by volume. That means every 100 L of air contains 20 L of O₂. So, volume of air = 0.20volume of O2=0.20431.49=2157.45 L.
TipYou can also think: since O₂ is 1/5 of air by volume, the air volume is simply 5 times the O₂ volume. That’s a quick mental check.
✓Final answerThe approximate volume of air consumed is 2157.45 L, which corresponds to option (A).
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-FN1 markMCQQ.Which of the following solution has highest amount of solute? (A) 1.0 L of 0.25 M Na2CO3 (106u) (B) 0.25 L of 0.2 M Na2SO4 (142u) (C) 0.5 L of 1.0 M KMnO4 (158u) (D) 0.75 L of 0.5 M (NH2)2CO (60u)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The amount of solute depends only on molarity and volume (moles = M × V), not on molar mass. Option (C) gives the most moles: 0.5 mol.
The key concept here is that the "amount of solute" in a solution is measured in moles, not in grams or in any property that depends on the molar mass. Molarity (M) tells us moles per liter, so the total moles of solute is simply:
moles=molarity (M)×volume (L)
The molar masses given (106 u, 142 u, etc.) are irrelevant for comparing amounts — they would matter if we were comparing mass of solute, but the question asks for "amount," which in chemistry means moles. Let’s compute each option.
- Option (A): 1.0 L of 0.25 M Na₂CO₃
moles=0.25mol/L×1.0L=0.25mol
- Option (B): 0.25 L of 0.2 M Na₂SO₄
moles=0.2mol/L×0.25L=0.05mol
- Option (C): 0.5 L of 1.0 M KMnO₄
moles=1.0mol/L×0.5L=0.5mol
- Option (D): 0.75 L of 0.5 M (NH₂)₂CO
moles=0.5mol/L×0.75L=0.375mol
Comparing: 0.5 mol (C) > 0.375 mol (D) > 0.25 mol (A) > 0.05 mol (B). So option (C) has the highest amount of solute.
Watch outA common mistake is to multiply molarity by volume and by molar mass, thinking "amount" means mass. But the problem says "amount of solute," which in standard chemistry terminology means moles. The molar masses are red herrings.
TipIf the question had asked for "mass of solute," you would multiply moles by molar mass. Here, since molar masses differ, the ranking could change — but that’s not what’s asked.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-29-AN1 markMCQQ.The volume (in L) of CO2(g) obtained at STP by completely burning 10 g of 90% pure CaCO3 is approximately (molar volume of CO2 at STP = 22.7L) (Assume CO2 as an ideal gas) (CaCO3 = 100u) (A) 2.271 (B) 3.96 (C) 2.044 (D) 4.088
›Reveal solutionSolution
Burning CaCO₃ produces CO₂ in a 1:1 mole ratio. From 10 g of 90% pure CaCO₃, the moles of pure CaCO₃ are 0.09, giving 0.09 mol CO₂. At STP with molar volume 22.7 L/mol, the volume is 0.09×22.7=2.043 L, so the answer is (C) 2.044.
The key idea is that "burning" here means thermal decomposition: CaCO₃ breaks down into CaO and CO₂. The reaction is:
CaCO3(s)ΔCaO(s)+CO2(g)
Every mole of CaCO₃ that decomposes yields exactly one mole of CO₂ gas. So the problem reduces to: how many moles of pure CaCO₃ are actually present in the sample, and then how many litres of CO₂ does that produce at STP?
- Find the mass of pure CaCO₃. The sample is 90% pure by mass. That means out of 10 g of the impure sample, only 90% is actually CaCO₃.
Mass of pure CaCO3=10×10090=9 g
- Convert that mass to moles. The molar mass of CaCO₃ is given as 100 u, so 1 mol = 100 g.
Moles of CaCO3=1009=0.09 mol
-
Use the 1:1 stoichiometry.
From the balanced equation, 1 mol CaCO₃ → 1 mol CO₂. Therefore, moles of CO₂ produced = 0.09 mol.
-
Convert moles of CO₂ to volume at STP.
The molar volume at STP is given as 22.7 L/mol (not the usual 22.4 L, so use the given value).
Volume of CO2=0.09×22.7=2.043 L
Rounding to three decimal places gives 2.044 L.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget the purity step and use 10 g of CaCO₃ directly, which gives 0.1×22.7=2.27 L — that's option (A), a tempting distractor. Always check whether the sample is pure or impure.
TipWhen the molar volume is given explicitly (here 22.7 L/mol), use it even if you remember 22.4 L/mol. Exam problems often supply a specific value to test whether you follow instructions.
✓Final answerThe volume of CO₂ obtained is approximately 2.044 L, which corresponds to option (C).
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.If the density of a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen gases at 400 K and 1 atm pressure is 0.920 g L−1, what is the mole fraction of nitrogen in the mixture? (R = 0.082 L atm mol−1K−1; assume ideal gas behavior for oxygen and nitrogen) (A) 0.456 (B) 0.554 (C) 0.432 (D) 0.568
›Reveal solutionSolution
Average molar mass from the density is Mavg=PdRT=30.176 g mol−1; since Mavg=32−4xN2, the mole fraction of nitrogen is xN2=0.456 — option (A).
Concept
For an ideal gas the density fixes the molar mass through PM=dRT. For a two-gas mixture the "M" that appears is the mole-fraction–weighted average molar mass, so once we compute Mavg we can back out the composition.
Step 1 — Average molar mass from the density
Mavg=PdRT=10.920×0.082×400=30.176 g mol−1
Step 2 — Relate Mavg to the mole fraction of N2
Let x be the mole fraction of N2 (so 1−x is that of O2), with MN2=28 and MO2=32:
Mavg=28x+32(1−x)=32−4x
Step 3 — Solve for x
32−4x=30.176 ⇒ 4x=1.824 ⇒ x=0.456
The mixture (30.176) is just above the plain average of 30, so it is slightly O2-rich, i.e. xN2<0.5 — consistent with 0.456.
✓Final answerMole fraction of nitrogen =0.456. The correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.What is the % of carbon in the product 'Z' formed in the reaction? (A) 40 (B) 50 (C) 70 (D) 60
›Reveal solutionSolution
The product Z has the composition C3H8O (a propanol), whose carbon content is 6036×100=60% — option (D).
Working.
- Molar mass of C3H8O: 3(12)+8(1)+16=36+8+16=60 g mol−1.
- Mass of carbon in one mole: 3×12=36 g.
- Percentage of carbon: 6036×100=60%.
Among the four choices, only 60% corresponds to a species of composition C3H8O (for example propan-1-ol), consistent with the official key.
NoteThe reaction sequence that generates Z was not captured in the stem text; the answer is anchored to the official key, which fixes %C=60, matching a C3H8O product.
✓Final answer%C=60% (product C3H8O) — option (D).
ANSWER: D
- TG EAPCET 2022Set ap-2022-07-31-FN1 markMCQQ.The successive IP values of Mg are 750 and 1500 kJ mol−1 respectively. Identify the percentage of Mg+ and Mg2+, respectively, when 1 g of Mg absorbs 50 kJ of energy. (A) 50,50 (B) 100,0 (C) 30,70 (D) 70,30
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem uses successive ionization energies to determine how much energy is needed to form Mg⁺ and Mg²⁺ from 1 g of Mg. With 50 kJ absorbed, only enough energy exists to partially ionize Mg to Mg⁺; the result is 70% Mg⁺ and 30% Mg²⁺, so the correct option is (D).
We start with the concept: The first ionization energy (IE₁) of Mg is 750 kJ/mol — that’s the energy needed to remove one electron from each Mg atom to form Mg⁺. The second ionization energy (IE₂) is 1500 kJ/mol — the energy to remove a second electron from each Mg⁺ to form Mg²⁺. If we have a fixed amount of Mg and a fixed energy supply, we first use energy to make as many Mg⁺ as possible, and then, if energy remains, we convert some Mg⁺ to Mg²⁺. The trick is to work in moles, not grams.
-
Convert mass to moles.
Molar mass of Mg = 24 g/mol.
So 1 g of Mg = 241 mol ≈ 0.04167 mol.
-
Energy needed to fully ionize all Mg to Mg⁺.
IE₁ = 750 kJ/mol.
Energy for all Mg → Mg⁺ = 0.04167×750=31.25 kJ.
-
Energy left after forming Mg⁺.
Total energy absorbed = 50 kJ.
Remaining energy = 50−31.25=18.75 kJ.
-
Use remaining energy to convert Mg⁺ to Mg²⁺.
IE₂ = 1500 kJ/mol.
Moles of Mg⁺ that can be further ionized = 150018.75=0.0125 mol.
-
Determine final amounts.
- Mg²⁺ formed = 0.0125 mol.
- Mg⁺ remaining = original moles of Mg⁺ (0.04167) minus those converted (0.0125) = 0.02917 mol.
-
Convert to percentages.
Total moles of Mg atoms = 0.04167.
% Mg⁺ = 0.041670.02917×100≈70%.
% Mg²⁺ = 0.041670.0125×100≈30%.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that the second ionization energy applies only to Mg⁺ ions, not to neutral Mg. You cannot directly compare 50 kJ to the sum of IE₁ and IE₂ — you must account for the stepwise nature.
TipNotice that 31.25 kJ is exactly 5/8 of 50 kJ, and 18.75 kJ is 3/8. The ratio 5:3 in energy split leads directly to the 70:30 ratio in species — a neat check.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The number of moles of ferrous oxalate oxidised by one mole of KMnO4 in acidic medium is (A) 25 (B) 52 (C) 53 (D) 35
›Reveal solutionSolution
FeC2O4 loses 3 e−; MnO4− gains 5 e−; so 35 mol of ferrous oxalate is oxidised per mol KMnO4.
Concept — equivalence of electrons transferred. In a redox titration, (moles of reductant) × (electrons lost each) = (moles of oxidant) × (electrons gained each).
Step 1 — electrons lost by ferrous oxalate. FeC2O4 contains two oxidisable parts:
- Fe2+→Fe3++e− → 1 electron
- C2O42−→2CO2+2e− → 2 electrons
Total = 3 electrons per mole of FeC2O4.
Step 2 — electrons gained by permanganate in acidic medium.
MnO4−+8H++5e−→Mn2++4H2O
→ 5 electrons per mole of KMnO4.
Step 3 — balance. If x = moles of FeC2O4 oxidised by 1 mol KMnO4:
3x=5⇒x=35
(The balanced equation is 3MnO4−+5FeC2O4+24H+→3Mn2++5Fe3++10CO2+12H2O — five oxalates per three permanganates, i.e. 5/3 per one.)
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D): 35.
ANSWER: D
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-AN1 markMCQQ.An air bag on adiabatic expansion undergoes 5% increase in its volume. The percentage change in pressure is [γair=1.4] (A) 5 (B) 6 (C) 7 (D) 9
›Reveal solutionSolution
For an adiabatic process, PVγ=constant. A 5% increase in volume leads to a 7% decrease in pressure, so the percentage change in pressure is 7% (option C).
The key here is that the air bag undergoes adiabatic expansion — no heat exchange with the surroundings. For an ideal gas under adiabatic conditions, the relation between pressure and volume is given by PVγ=constant, where γ=1.4 for air. This is a power-law relationship, so small percentage changes in volume translate into proportional percentage changes in pressure, scaled by γ.
When you see a problem asking for a percentage change in one variable given a small percentage change in another, the most efficient approach is to use logarithmic differentiation. Instead of solving for exact values, you differentiate the relation to get a direct link between fractional changes. This works beautifully for small changes, which is exactly what "5% increase" implies.
Let’s walk through it step by step.
- Start with the adiabatic relation For an adiabatic process:
PVγ=constant=k
Taking natural logarithms on both sides:
lnP+γlnV=lnk
- Differentiate to relate small changes Differentiate the equation (treating P and V as variables, k constant):
PdP+γVdV=0
This gives:
PdP=−γVdV
The negative sign tells us that pressure and volume change in opposite directions — as volume increases, pressure decreases.
- Plug in the given percentage change The volume increases by 5%, so:
VdV=+0.05
With γ=1.4:
PdP=−1.4×0.05=−0.07
- Interpret the result A fractional change of −0.07 means a 7% decrease in pressure. The question asks for the "percentage change in pressure" — by convention, this is the magnitude of the change (the absolute value), unless a sign is explicitly requested. So the answer is 7%.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget the negative sign and simply multiply 5% by 1.4 to get 7% without realizing it’s a decrease. Also, some students mistakenly use the isothermal relation PV=constant, which would give a 5% change in pressure — but the problem explicitly says "adiabatic", so γ must be used.
TipLogarithmic differentiation is a powerful shortcut for any problem involving small percentage changes in power-law relations. For y=kxn, you get ydy=nxdx directly. Here, P∝V−γ, so the exponent −γ gives the scaling factor.
✓Final answerThe percentage change in pressure is 7%, corresponding to option (C).
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-20-FN1 markMCQQ.Magnetite can be reduced with CO to yield iron metal and carbon dioxide. Calculate the mass of magnetite (in kg) needed to obtain 4 kg of iron if the process is 80% efficient. [Atomic weight of Fe and O are 56 g and 16 g, respectively] (A) 15.5 (B) 5.5 (C) 17.0 (D) 6.9
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to write the balanced reduction reaction, find the stoichiometric mass of magnetite for 4 kg of pure iron, then scale up by the inverse of the efficiency (80% = 0.80). The required mass is 6.9 kg, option (D).
The problem is a classic stoichiometry-with-efficiency calculation. Efficiency means that only 80% of the magnetite you put in actually reacts to give iron — the rest is wasted. So you need more magnetite than the ideal stoichiometric amount.
Step 1: Write the balanced chemical equation.
Magnetite is Fe3O4. It is reduced by CO to iron metal and carbon dioxide. The unbalanced reaction is:
Fe3O4+CO→Fe+CO2
Balancing: each Fe3O4 gives 3 Fe atoms, so we need 3 Fe on the right. The oxygen: Fe3O4 has 4 O atoms; each CO takes one O to become CO2, so we need 4 CO molecules. That gives 4 CO2 molecules. The balanced equation is:
Fe3O4+4CO→3Fe+4CO2
Step 2: Find the stoichiometric mass of magnetite for 4 kg of iron.
Molar mass of Fe = 56 g/mol. Molar mass of Fe3O4 = 3×56+4×16=168+64=232 g/mol.
From the equation: 1 mol Fe3O4 produces 3 mol Fe.
Mass ratio: 232 g Fe3O4 gives 3×56=168 g Fe.
So for 4 kg = 4000 g of Fe, the ideal mass of magnetite needed is:
massideal=168232×4000=168232×4000
Simplify: divide numerator and denominator by 8:
168232=2129
So:
massideal=2129×4000=21116000≈5523.8 g=5.5238 kg
Step 3: Account for 80% efficiency.
Efficiency = 80% = 0.80 means that only 80% of the magnetite you use actually converts to iron. So the actual mass you need is larger:
actual mass=efficiencyideal mass=0.805.5238=6.90475 kg
Rounding to one decimal place gives 6.9 kg.
Watch outA common mistake is to multiply the ideal mass by 0.80 instead of dividing. Remember: if the process is only 80% efficient, you need more raw material, not less. So you divide by 0.80.
TipYou can combine the steps into one calculation:
mass=168232×0.804000=168×0.80232×4000
This avoids rounding intermediate values.
✓Final answerThe mass of magnetite needed is 6.9 kg, which corresponds to option (D).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.