Q.Show that "if a matrix A is invertible, then A is non-singular".
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Inverse Matrix Method
The Inverse Matrix Method
Many problems reduce to a system of linear equations, for example
2x+3yx− y=8=−1.
The inverse matrix method solves such a system by writing it as a single matrix equation and then undoing the coefficient matrix with its inverse — the matrix analogue of dividing.
Writing the system as AX=B
Collect the coefficients, the unknowns and the constants:
A=(213−1),X=(xy),B=(8−1),
so the whole system becomes AX=B.
The idea
For numbers, ax=b gives x=a−1b provided a=0. The same works for matrices: if A is invertible, multiply AX=B on the left by A−1:
A−1(AX)=A−1B⇒IX=A−1B⇒X=A−1B.
X=A−1B
Multiplying on the left matters — matrix products do not commute, so BA−1 would be wrong.
When it works
The inverse A−1 exists only when detA=0, so:
- detA=0: the system is consistent with the unique solution X=A−1B.
- detA=0: no inverse; the system is either inconsistent (no solution) or has infinitely many — handle it by another method.
Worked steps
For the system above, detA=(2)(−1)−(3)(1)=−5=0, and
A−1=−51(−1−1−32).
Then …
Prove by contrapositive: a singular matrix cannot be invertible.
The statement is p⇒q with p: "A invertible", q: "A non-singular". Prove ∼q⇒∼p: if A is singular then ∣A∣=0, so
A−1=∣A∣adjA …
Prove it by the contrapositive: show that if A is singular (i.e. ∣A∣=0), then A cannot be invertible.
Write the statement in symbolic form as p⇒q, where
p:"A is invertible",q:"A is non-singular".
We prove the equivalent contrapositive ∼q⇒∼p: if A is not non-singular, then A is not invertible.
Step 1 — Translate the hypothesis ∼q.
If A is not non-singular, then A is singular, which means
∣A∣=0.
Step 2 — Test whether an inverse can exist.
The inverse of a square matrix is given by
A−1=∣A∣adjA.
With ∣A∣=0, this expression divides by 0, so it is undefined — A−1 does not exist.
Step 3 — Conclude ∼p. …
Method: Proving an Implication via the Contrapositive (Matrix Case)
Use this whenever you're asked to "show that if [property A] then [property B]" about a matrix and the forward direction is awkward to argue directly, but the reverse (negated) direction follows immediately from a known formula.
Steps
Step 1: Write the statement as p⇒q
Identify p = the hypothesis (e.g. "A is invertible") and q = the conclusion (e.g. "A is non-singular, i.e. ∣A∣=0").
Step 2: Form and state the contrapositive ∼q⇒∼p
Negate and swap: "if A is singular (∣A∣=0), then A is not invertible." Confirm this is logically equivalent to the original — proving one proves the other.
Step 3: Assume ∼q and test the defining formula …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Arguing directly and circularly instead of via the contrapositive
Reasoning "since A is invertible, A−1=∣A∣adjA exists, so ∣A∣=0" skips straight to a forward algebraic argument without ever stating p⇒q and its contrapositive. Why it's wrong: the exercise specifically names the contrapositive technique — jumping to a bare forward statement misses the reasoning skill being tested and can leave the logical structure incompletely justified. Correct approach: explicitly name p and q, state the contrapositive ∼q⇒∼p, and prove that.
Mistake 2: Confusing "singular" and "non-singular" …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.If A=1−1221−1−121, then (AdjA)(Adj(AdjA))= (A) 196A2 (B) 14(AdjA) (C) 14A (D) 196I
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to use the property that for an n×n matrix, Adj(A)=∣A∣A−1 and Adj(Adj(A))=∣A∣n−2A. Here n=3 and ∣A∣=14, so the product simplifies to 196I.
We are given
A=1−1221−1−121
and need to compute (AdjA)(Adj(AdjA)).
Concept and Intuition
The adjugate (classical adjoint) of a matrix is intimately tied to its determinant and inverse. For an invertible n×n matrix A, we have the fundamental relation:
A⋅Adj(A)=Adj(A)⋅A=∣A∣I
This means Adj(A)=∣A∣A−1. Applying the adjugate twice leads to a neat formula:
Adj(Adj(A))=∣A∣n−2A
for n≥2. So instead of computing huge 3×3 adjugates directly, we can compute the determinant of A once and plug into these formulas. The product then becomes a scalar multiple of the identity.
Step-by-step solution
- Compute ∣A∣ Expand along the first row:
∣A∣=1⋅1−121−2⋅−1221+(−1)⋅−121−1
=1⋅(1⋅1−2⋅(−1))−2⋅((−1)⋅1−2⋅2)−1⋅((−1)⋅(−1)−1⋅2)
=1⋅(1+2)−2⋅(−1−4)−1⋅(1−2)
=3−2⋅(−5)−1⋅(−1)=3+10+1=14
- Use the adjugate-inverse relation Since ∣A∣=14=0, A is invertible and
Adj(A)=∣A∣A−1=14A−1
- Find Adj(Adj(A)) For a 3×3 matrix (n=3), the formula is:
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-AN1 markMCQQ.If A=001010100, B=xlpymqznr and (A2B+A4B)−1=21101210−121, then xyz−lmn−pqr= (A) 631(37) (B) 231(45) (C) 1 (D) 0
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to simplify the matrix equation using the fact that A is an involution (A2=I), which collapses A2B+A4B into 2B. Then we invert both sides to find B, compute the required expression xyz−lmn−pqr as the determinant of B, and match it to the given options.
We are given two matrices:
A=001010100,B=xlpymqznr
and the equation
(A2B+A4B)−1=21101210−121.
We need xyz−lmn−pqr.
Concept and intuition:
Notice that A is a permutation matrix that swaps the first and third rows/columns. Squaring it gives the identity: A2=I. That means A4=(A2)2=I2=I. So A2B+A4B=IB+IB=2B. The left-hand side simplifies dramatically. Then the equation becomes (2B)−1=21C, where C is the given 3×3 matrix. Inverting both sides lets us find B exactly. The expression xyz−lmn−pqr looks like the determinant of B (expanded along the first row, with signs: x(mr−nq)−y(lr−np)+z(lq−mp)). But here it's xyz−lmn−pqr, which is not the full determinant — it’s only three terms. That suggests a special structure: if B is a permutation of a diagonal matrix, many entries vanish. Let’s work it out.
Step-by-step solution:
- Simplify the matrix power. Compute A2:
A2=001010100001010100=100010001=I.
Hence A2=I, so A4=(A2)2=I2=I.
Therefore:
A2B+A4B=IB+IB=2B.
- Rewrite the given equation. The equation becomes:
(2B)−1=21101210−121.
Since (2B)−1=21B−1, we have:
21B−1=21101210−121.
Multiply both sides by 2:
B−1=101210−121.
- Find B by inverting the given matrix. Let C=101210−121. Then B=C−1. Compute det(C):
det(C)=1⋅(1⋅1−2⋅0)−2⋅(0⋅1−2⋅1)+(−1)⋅(0⋅0−1⋅1)=1⋅1−2⋅(−2)+(−1)⋅(−1)=1+4+1=6.
Now find the adjugate (or use row reduction). Compute cofactors:
- C11=+(1⋅1−2⋅0)=1
- C12=−(0⋅1−2⋅1)=−(−2)=2
- C13=+(0⋅0−1⋅1)=−1
- C21=−(2⋅1−(−1)⋅0)=−(2)=−2
- C22=+(1⋅1−(−1)⋅1)=1+1=2
- C23=−(1⋅0−2⋅1)=−(−2)=2
- C31=+(2⋅2−(−1)⋅1)=4+1=5
- C32=−(1⋅2−(−1)⋅0)=−(2)=−2
- C33=+(1⋅1−2⋅0)=1
The cofactor matrix is:
1−2522−2−121.
Transpose to get the adjugate:
adj(C)=12−1−2225−21.
Then:
B=C−1=det(C)1adj(C)=6112−1−2225−21.
- Identify entries of B. So:
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.The inverse of the function y=10x+10−x+110x−10−x is x= (A) log(2−yy) (B) log10(2−yy) (C) 101log(1−yy) (D) 21log10(2−yy)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Inverting the relation gives x=21log10(2−yy) — option (D).
Let t=10x (so 10−x=1/t). Rearranging the defining relation and isolating t leads to
t2=102x=2−yy.
Taking base-10 logarithms of both sides: …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.If (x,y,z)=(α,β,γ) is the unique solution of the system of simultaneous linear equations 3x−4y+z+7=0, 2x+3y−z=10, x−2y−3z=3, then α= (A) 3 (B) −3 (C) −1 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The system is solved by elimination or Cramer’s rule; the unique value of α (the x-coordinate) is 1, so the correct option is (D).
We are given three linear equations in x,y,z and told the solution is unique. The question asks for α, which is the x-coordinate of that unique solution. The most direct path is to eliminate y and z systematically to solve for x.
Concept & Intuition
When a system is linear and has a unique solution, we can combine the equations to cancel variables one at a time. Here, notice that the first two equations both contain z with opposite signs (+z and −z). Adding them will immediately eliminate z, giving a relation between x and y. Then we can use the third equation to eliminate y and solve for x.
Step-by-step solution
- Write the equations in standard form
(1)(2)(3)3x−4y+z=−72x+3y−z=10x−2y−3z=3
(We moved the constant terms to the right side.)
- Eliminate z using equations (1) and (2) Add (1) and (2):
(3x−4y+z)+(2x+3y−z)=−7+10
The z terms cancel:
5x−y=3(call this equation A)
- Eliminate z again, but using (1) and (3) Multiply (1) by 3 so that z has coefficient 3:
9x−12y+3z=−21
Now add this to (3):
(9x−12y+3z)+(x−2y−3z)=−21+3
The z terms cancel:
10x−14y=−18
Divide by 2:
5x−7y=−9(equation B)
- Solve for x using equations A and B We have: {5x−y=35x−7y=−9 …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.Let A be a matrix such that AB is a scalar matrix where B=[1023] and det(3A)=27. Then 3A−1+A2= (A) [40−62] (B) [90−43] (C) [100−62] (D) [100−64]
›Reveal solutionSolution
We use properties of determinants to find det(A), then use the scalar matrix condition AB=kI and determinant properties to find the scalar k and matrix A. Finally, we compute 3A−1+A2. The result is [100−64].
The problem asks us to calculate a matrix expression involving A−1 and A2, given information about A and B. The core idea is to first determine the matrix A itself, or at least its inverse and square, using the given conditions. We'll leverage properties of determinants and the definition of a scalar matrix.
Here's how we approach this problem:
-
Determine the order of matrix A.
Matrix B is a 2×2 matrix. For the product AB to be defined, matrix A must have 2 columns. Let A be an m×2 matrix. The product AB will then be an m×2 matrix.
We are told that AB is a scalar matrix. A scalar matrix is a special type of diagonal matrix where all diagonal elements are equal, and it must be a square matrix. Therefore, AB must be a 2×2 matrix. This implies that m=2, so A is also a 2×2 matrix.
-
Find the determinant of A.
We are given the condition det(3A)=27.
For an n×n matrix M and a scalar k, the determinant property is det(kM)=kndet(M).
Since A is a 2×2 matrix, n=2. Applying this property:
det(3A)=32det(A)=9det(A)
Equating this to the given value:9det(A)=27
det(A)=927=3
So, the determinant of matrix $A$ is $3$.3. Determine the scalar value for the product AB.
We know that AB is a scalar matrix. This means AB can be written in the form kI, where k is some scalar and I=[1001] is the 2×2 identity matrix.
So, AB=[k00k].
Now, let's take the determinant of both sides:
det(AB)=det(kI)
We know that $\det(AB) = \det(A) \det(B)$. From Step 2, we have $\det(A) = 3$. For matrix $B = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 3 \end{bmatrix}$, its determinant is $\det(B) = (1)(3) - (2)(0) = 3$. Therefore, $\det(AB) = (3)(3) = 9$. Also, for a $2 \times 2$ scalar matrix $kI$, its determinant is $\det(kI) = k^2$. Equating the two expressions for $\det(AB)$:k2=9
This gives us two possible values for $k$: $k = 3$ or $k = -3$. We will proceed with $k=3$ first, as it's a common convention to consider the positive root unless specified, and check if it leads to one of the given options. If not, we would try $k=-3$.4. Find matrix A.
We have the relation AB=kI. To find A, we can multiply both sides by B−1 on the right:
A=kIB−1=kB−1
First, let's find $B^{-1}$:B=[1023]
det(B)=3
The adjoint of $B$ is $\text{adj}(B) = \begin{bmatrix} 3 & -2 \\ -0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 3 & -2 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$.B−1=det(B)1adj(B)=31[30−21]
Now, substitute $B^{-1}$ and $k=3$ into the expression for $A$:A=3⋅31[30−21]=[30−21]
Let's quickly verify $\det(A) = (3)(1) - (-2)(0) = 3$, which matches our finding in Step 2.5. Calculate 3A−1.
From the relation AB=kI, we can also find A−1. Multiply by A−1 on the left: …
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-18-AN1 markMCQQ.If A is a 3×3 matrix and ∣A∣=21 then A−1(Adj(AdjA))−1= (A) 8 (B) 81 (C) 21 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a 3×3 matrix, A−1(AdjA)−1=∣A∣31=(1/2)31=8.
Key identities (n=3).
For any invertible 3×3 matrix, ∣AdjA∣=∣A∣n−1=∣A∣2, and ∣A−1∣=∣A∣1.
Evaluate the determinant.
A−1(AdjA)−1=∣A−1∣AdjA−1=∣A∣1⋅∣A∣21=∣A∣31.
With ∣A∣=21:
∣A∣31=(1/2)31=23=8. …
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-AN1 markMCQQ.Let A=00−10−10−100, B=010100001 then (A−1B)−1+(AB−1)−1= (A) 1000−20002 (B) 00−2−2000−20 (C) −20000−20−20 (D) 00−20−20−200
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to simplify the expression (A−1B)−1+(AB−1)−1 using matrix inverse properties: (XY)−1=Y−1X−1. After simplification, the sum reduces to B−1A+BA−1, and computing these products yields the matrix 00−20−20−200, which matches option (D).
Concept and Intuition
When faced with a messy expression involving inverses and products, the first instinct should be to simplify using the fundamental property of matrix inverses: (XY)−1=Y−1X−1. This is the matrix analogue of "socks and shoes" — you reverse the order when undoing a composition. Here, we have two terms: (A−1B)−1 and (AB−1)−1. Applying the property to each will turn them into products of A, B, and their inverses, which we can then compute directly since A and B are given explicitly. The matrices are small (3×3), so after simplification we can multiply them by hand.
Step-by-step solution
- Simplify the first term Using (XY)−1=Y−1X−1 with X=A−1 and Y=B, we get
(A−1B)−1=B−1(A−1)−1=B−1A.
(Recall that (A−1)−1=A.)
- Simplify the second term Similarly, with X=A and Y=B−1,
(AB−1)−1=(B−1)−1A−1=BA−1.
- Combine the two terms The whole expression becomes
(A−1B)−1+(AB−1)−1=B−1A+BA−1.
- Find A−1 and B−1 A is a diagonal-like matrix (actually a permutation of signs):
A=00−10−10−100.
Its inverse is obtained by taking reciprocals of the nonzero entries (since it's essentially a diagonal matrix after reordering rows/columns). Check: A2=I? Compute:
A2=00−10−10−10000−10−10−100=100010001=I.
So A−1=A (it is its own inverse).
B is a permutation matrix swapping rows 1 and 2:
B=010100001.
Clearly B2=I as well, so B−1=B.
- Substitute the inverses Since A−1=A and B−1=B, we have
B−1A+BA−1=BA+BA=2BA.
(Because B−1=B and A−1=A, both terms are the same product BA.)
- Compute BA BA=01010000100−10−10−100…
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-05-FN1 markMCQQ.If A=100020003, then adj(adjA) is equal to (A) A (B) 36A (C) 6A (D) 61A
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a diagonal matrix, the adjoint of the adjoint simplifies to ∣A∣n−2A. Here n=3 and ∣A∣=6, so adj(adj A) = 6A.
The key idea is a known property of adjoints: for any square matrix A of order n,
adj(adj A) = ∣A∣n−2A, provided n≥2.
This is not a random formula — it follows from the fact that A⋅adj(A)=∣A∣I, and then applying the adjoint again.
Since A here is diagonal, its determinant is trivial to compute, and the property gives the answer directly.
- Find ∣A∣. A is diagonal with entries 1,2,3, so
∣A∣=1⋅2⋅3=6.
- Apply the property. For an n×n matrix,
adj(adj A)=∣A∣n−2A.
Here n=3, so n−2=1, giving
adj(adj A)=∣A∣1A=6A. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.