Q.The least value of the function f(x)=ax+xb (a>0, b>0, x>0) is ______.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Rational Function Optimization
Rational Function Optimization
A rational function is a ratio of two polynomials, f(x)=q(x)p(x) — for example f(x)=x+x1 or f(x)=xx2+1. Finding its maximum or minimum is a common maxima–minima task, and the only new skill is differentiating a quotient cleanly.
The Method
To optimise f(x)=q(x)p(x):
- Differentiate with the quotient rule,
f′(x)=(q(x))2p′(x)q(x)−p(x)q′(x).
- Set f′(x)=0. A fraction is zero only when its numerator is zero, so you only need p′q−pq′=0 — the denominator never has to vanish.
- Respect the domain. Values where q(x)=0 are excluded, and many problems restrict to x>0. Keep these in mind when choosing which critical point is valid.
- Classify each critical point with the second-derivative test or a sign check of f′.
Before differentiating, simplify. Splitting xx2+1=x+x1 turns an awkward quotient into an easy sum whose derivative is 1−x21.
A Worked Example
Minimise f(x)=x+x1 for x>0.
Differentiating, f′(x)=1−x21. Setting this to zero gives x2=1, so x=1 (taking the positive root, since x>0). Then f′′(x)=x32, and f′′(1)=2>0, confirming a minimum. The minimum value is f(1)=1+1=2.
This matches the AM–GM bound x+x1≥2, with equality at x=1 — a useful sanity check.
Common Mistakes
- Setting the whole quotient's denominator to zero — you solve numerator =0, not denominator =0. …
Key idea: Minimise f(x)=ax+xb (x>0) using calculus (or AM–GM).
f′(x)=a−x2b.
Set f′(x)=0: a=x2b⇒x2=ab⇒x=ab (positive root).
Since f′′(x)=x32b>0 for x>0, this is a minimum. Substituting: …
Setting f′(x)=a−x2b=0 gives x=b/a; since f′′>0 this is a minimum, and the least value is 2ab.
The idea
We want the smallest value of f(x)=ax+xb for x>0, with a,b>0. As x→0+ the term xb→+∞, and as x→∞ the term ax→+∞, so somewhere in between the sum bottoms out. We find that turning point with the derivative.
Step 1 — differentiate
f′(x)=a−x2b.
Step 2 — critical point
Set f′(x)=0:
a−x2b=0 ⇒ x2=ab ⇒ x=ab(positive root, since x>0).
Step 3 — confirm it is a minimum
f′′(x)=x32b>0for x>0,
so the function is concave up and the critical point is a minimum (and it is the global minimum, as f→+∞ at both ends).
Step 4 — the least value
Substitute x=b/a: …
Method: Finding Extrema of Functions of the Form ax+xb
This shape — a positive multiple of x plus a positive multiple of 1/x — recurs constantly (cost functions, quantities that trade off against each other as x grows), and always has exactly one extremum on x>0, found the same way every time.
Steps
Step 1: Differentiate.
f(x)=ax+xb⇒f′(x)=a−x2b.
Step 2: Set f′(x)=0 and solve for the critical point.
a=x2b⇒x2=ab⇒x=ab
keeping only the positive root when the domain requires x>0.
Step 3: Classify the critical point with the second derivative.
f′′(x)=x32b.
For x>0 (and b>0), f′′(x)>0 always — so the single critical point is always a minimum on this domain (never a maximum), and since f(x)→∞ at both ends of (0,∞), it is automatically the global minimum too.
Step 4 (Applying to this problem): substitute back to get the extreme value. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Keeping the negative root x=−b/a
Why it's wrong: Solving x2=b/a algebraically gives x=±b/a, but the problem restricts x>0 — carrying the negative root forward (or averaging both) gives a nonsensical or wrong critical point. Correct approach: discard the negative root immediately since it falls outside the given domain.
Mistake 2: Assuming the critical point is a minimum without checking …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.The local maximum value l and local minimum value m of f(x)=x+1x2+2x+2 in R−{−1} exist at α,β respectively, then α+βl+m= (A) 0 (B) −4 (C) −2 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
α+βl+m=0 — option (A).
Write f(x)=x+1(x+1)2+1=(x+1)+x+11. Then
f′(x)=1−(x+1)21=0 ⇒ x+1=±1.
- At x=−2 (where x+1<0): local maximum, l=f(−2)=−2, so α=−2. …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.If x and y are two positive integers such that x+y=24 and x3y5 is maximum, then x2+y2= (A) 288 (B) 296 (C) 306 (D) 320
›Reveal solutionSolution
To maximize x3y5 under x+y=24 with positive integers, we use the weighted AM–GM inequality to find the optimal ratio x:y=3:5, giving x=9, y=15, so x2+y2=306, which is option (C).
We want to maximize x3y5 given x+y=24 and x,y>0 (positive integers). The exponents 3 and 5 suggest a weighted approach: the product is maximized when the numbers are split in proportion to the exponents. This is a classic application of the weighted AM–GM inequality, which tells us that for fixed sum, a product of powers is maximized when the variables are in the ratio of their exponents.
Let’s work through it carefully.
- Set up the weighted AM–GM For positive x,y, the weighted arithmetic mean–geometric mean inequality says:
3+53⋅3x+5⋅5y≥((3x)3(5y)5)1/8
But more directly, we can write:
83(3x)+5(5y)≥((3x)3(5y)5)1/8
The left side simplifies to 8x+y=824=3.
- Equality condition Equality in weighted AM–GM occurs when all terms are equal:
3x=5y
So 5x=3y.
- Solve for x and y Using x+y=24 and 5x=3y, substitute y=35x: x+35x=24⇒38x=24⇒x=9…
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.For all real values of x, the minimum value of 1+x+x21−x+x2 is (A) 0 (B) 31 (C) 1 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to treat the rational expression as a variable y, cross-multiply to form a quadratic in x, and use the discriminant condition for real x to find the range of y. The minimum value is 31.
We are asked for the minimum value of
y=1+x+x21−x+x2
over all real x. The denominator 1+x+x2 is always positive (its discriminant 1−4=−3<0), so the expression is defined for every real x. The problem is to find the smallest possible y as x varies over R.
The direct approach — differentiating and setting the derivative to zero — works, but there is a cleaner algebraic method that avoids calculus and gives the entire range at once. That method is the discriminant technique for rational functions.
- Set up the equation. Let
y=1+x+x21−x+x2.
Since the denominator is never zero, we can cross-multiply:
y(1+x+x2)=1−x+x2.
- Rearrange into a quadratic in x. Expand and bring all terms to one side:
y+yx+yx2=1−x+x2
⟹yx2−x2+yx+x+y−1=0
⟹(y−1)x2+(y+1)x+(y−1)=0.
This is a quadratic equation in x (unless y=1, which we will treat separately).
- Apply the condition that x is real. For a given y, if there exists a real x satisfying the equation, then the discriminant of this quadratic must be non-negative. The discriminant Δ is:
Δ=(y+1)2−4(y−1)(y−1).
Simplify:
Δ=(y+1)2−4(y−1)2.
- Simplify the discriminant. Expand both squares:
(y+1)2=y2+2y+1,4(y−1)2=4(y2−2y+1)=4y2−8y+4.
So
Δ=(y2+2y+1)−(4y2−8y+4)=−3y2+10y−3.
For real x, we need Δ≥0:
−3y2+10y−3≥0.
- Solve the inequality. Multiply by −1 (reversing the inequality):
3y2−10y+3≤0.
Factor the quadratic:
3y2−10y+3=(3y−1)(y−3).
Check: (3y−1)(y−3)=3y2−9y−y+3=3y2−10y+3. Correct.
The inequality (3y−1)(y−3)≤0 holds when y lies between the roots:
31≤y≤3.
- Check the special case y=1. …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.If the function f(x)=5x+x5, (x=0) attains its relative maximum value at x=a then a2+2a−6= (A) 10 (B) 6 (C) 5 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The function has no relative maximum (only a minimum), so the premise is impossible; the only way to make sense of the question is to treat the minimum point as the intended extremum, giving a=5 and the expression equals 5.
We are asked: if f(x)=5x+x5 attains its relative maximum at x=a, find a2+2a−6.
The first thing to notice: this function is of the form f(x)=5x+x5, which is a classic sum of a linear term and its reciprocal. For x>0, by AM–GM, the minimum occurs when 5x=x5, i.e., x2=25, so x=5. For x<0, the function is negative and has a maximum (since both terms are negative, their sum is most negative at the same balance point x=−5). But the problem says "relative maximum" — and the function actually has no relative maximum for x>0; it has only a minimum. This is a classic trick: students might blindly set derivative to zero and forget to check whether it's a max or min.
Let’s work through carefully.
- Find critical points. Differentiate:
f′(x)=51−x25.
Set f′(x)=0:
51=x25⇒x2=25⇒x=±5.
- Classify each critical point. Second derivative:
f′′(x)=x310.
- At x=5: f′′(5)=12510>0 → local minimum.
- At x=−5: f′′(−5)=−12510<0 → local maximum.
So the only relative maximum is at x=−5, not at a positive x.
- Interpret the problem’s wording. …
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-FN1 markMCQQ.The equation of lowest degree with rational coefficients having roots 3+2i and 3−2i is (A) (x4−2x2+25)(x4−10x2+1)=0 (B) (x2−23x+5)(x2−23x+1)=0 (C) (x4−2x2+25)(x4+10x2+1)=0 (D) (x4−10x2+1)(x4+2x2+25)=0
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that for a polynomial with rational coefficients, irrational and complex roots must appear in conjugate pairs. The given roots 3+2i and 3−2i are conjugates of each other, but they also force the inclusion of their other conjugates −3±2i to ensure all coefficients are rational. The lowest-degree polynomial with rational coefficients having these four roots is (x4−2x2+25)(x4−10x2+1)=0, which corresponds to option (A).
The problem asks for the equation of lowest degree with rational coefficients that has the given two roots. This is a classic trap: students often think that since the two given numbers are already conjugates (one has +2i, the other −2i), that's enough. But look carefully — the coefficients must be rational, not just real.
The numbers 3+2i and 3−2i involve 3, which is irrational. For a polynomial with rational coefficients, if a root contains an irrational square root, its conjugate under that square root must also be a root. Here, the irrational part is 3, so the conjugates −3+2i and −3−2i must also be roots. That gives us four roots in total.
Let's build the polynomial step by step.
-
Identify all four required roots.
The given roots are r1=3+2i and r2=3−2i.
To make coefficients rational, we also need r3=−3+2i and r4=−3−2i.
-
Group the roots into conjugate pairs that produce quadratic factors with rational coefficients.
Pair r1 and r2: their sum is 23 and product is (3)2+(2)2=3+2=5.
So the quadratic for this pair is x2−(23)x+5=0.
But this has an irrational coefficient (23), so it's not yet a factor with rational coefficients. We need to pair differently.
-
Pair roots that eliminate the irrationality in the coefficients.
The trick is to pair 3+2i with −3+2i — these share the same imaginary part but opposite real parts.
Their sum: (3−3)+(22i)=22i — still not rational.
Instead, pair 3+2i with −3−2i:
Sum = 0, Product = −(3)2−(2)2=−3−2=−5.
That gives x2+0x−5=x2−5 — but this has irrational roots ±5, not our numbers. So that's wrong.
The correct grouping: pair 3+2i with 3−2i to get x2−23x+5, and pair −3+2i with −3−2i to get x2+23x+5.
Multiply these two quadratics:
(x2+5−23x)(x2+5+23x)=(x2+5)2−(23x)2
=x4+10x2+25−12x2=x4−2x2+25.
-
Now handle the other pair of conjugates.
The remaining roots are 3+2i and −3+2i? No — we've used all four. Wait, we need to also form a factor from the other natural grouping: pair 3+2i with −3+2i? That gives x2−22ix−5, which has complex coefficients — not allowed.
The correct second grouping: pair 3+2i with −3−2i? That gave x2−5, which doesn't have our roots. So the only way to get rational coefficients is to take the product of the two quadratics we already found: (x2−23x+5)(x2+23x+5)=x4−2x2+25. That's one quartic factor.
-
But we need a polynomial that has all four roots. The quartic x4−2x2+25 has roots ±3±2i? Let's check: if x=3+2i, then x2=3+26i−2=1+26i, so x4=(1+26i)2=1+46i−24=−23+46i. Then x4−2x2+25=(−23+46i)−2(1+26i)+25=(−23−2+25)+(46i−46i)=0. Yes, it works. So x4−2x2+25=0 has all four roots ±3±2i. …
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.