Q.Check the continuity of the function f given by f(x)=2x+3 at x=1.
Concept understanding — Continuity At A Point
Continuity at a Point
Imagine drawing the graph of a function and putting your pen down at x=a. If the function is continuous there, you can draw straight through that point without lifting your pen — no jump, no hole, no break. That is the intuition; here is the precision.
The Three-Condition Test
For f(x) to be continuous at x=a, all three must hold. If even one fails, f is discontinuous there.
Continuity at x=a requires:
- f(a) is defined,
- x→alimf(x) exists (left- and right-hand limits are equal),
- x→alimf(x)=f(a).
Condition 1 says a is in the domain — the pen must have somewhere to land. Condition 2 says the curve approaches a single value from both sides — no jump. Condition 3 says that common approach value actually matches the function's value at a — no misplaced point.
Why All Three Are Needed
f(x)=x−1x2−1 has limx→1f(x)=2, yet f(1) is undefined (zero denominator). Condition 1 fails, leaving a hole at (1,2).
A piecewise function shows the opposite can be fine:
f(x)=⎩⎨⎧x+13x+1x<2x=2x>2
Here f(2)=3, both one-sided limits equal 3, and they match f(2) — so all three hold and f is continuous at x=2.
Common Pitfalls
"Limit exists" does not mean "continuous." The hole example has a limit but no continuity — the limit must equal the function value.
"Defined everywhere" does not mean "continuous." A piecewise function can have a value at every point and still jump. Always check the one-sided limits.
A Quick Check
Is f(x)=∣x∣ continuous at x=0? f(0)=0, limx→0∣x∣=0, and the two agree — yes, even though ∣x∣ has a sharp corner. Continuity demands no break, not smoothness.
Takeaway: continuity at a point means the function value and the two one-sided limits all agree. Agreement ⇒ the graph passes through unbroken; disagreement ⇒ a discontinuity.
Continuity at a Point is the opening idea of the CBSE Class 12 Continuity and Differentiability chapter, and the three-condition test described here matches exactly what NCERT exercises and "continuity and differentiability class 12 important questions" expect students to apply. This concept is also foundational for JEE Main and NEET, where checking continuity is often the first step before testing differentiability of a function.
Concept: Continuity At A Point — A function f is continuous at x=a if limx→af(x)=f(a).
-
Compute f(1):
f(1)=2(1)+3=5.
-
Compute limx→1f(x):
Since f(x)=2x+3 is a polynomial, the limit is simply the value at x=1:
limx→1(2x+3)=2(1)+3=5.
-
Compare:
limx→1f(x)=5=f(1).
All three conditions of continuity are satisfied.
The function f(x)=2x+3 is continuous at x=1.
A linear function like f(x)=2x+3 is continuous everywhere because its graph is an unbroken line. At x=1, the three conditions for continuity all hold: f(1)=5, limx→1f(x)=5, and they match — so the function is continuous at x=1.
The idea of continuity at a point is simple: a function is continuous at x=a if you can draw its graph near that point without lifting your pen. More formally, three things must be true:
- The function is defined at a — f(a) exists.
- The limit of f(x) as x approaches a exists.
- That limit equals the function value: limx→af(x)=f(a).
If any one of these fails, the function is discontinuous at that point.
For f(x)=2x+3, we're dealing with a straight line — the simplest continuous function there is. Let's check each condition at x=1.
Step 1: Check if f(1) exists.
Plug x=1 into the function:
f(1)=2(1)+3=5
The function is defined and gives a value of 5. Condition 1 is satisfied.
Step 2: Check if limx→1f(x) exists.
Since f is a polynomial (specifically a linear polynomial), its limit as x approaches any real number is simply the function value at that point. But let's verify from both sides to be thorough.
Left-hand limit (x→1−):
limx→1−(2x+3)=2(1)+3=5
Right-hand limit (x→1+):
limx→1+(2x+3)=2(1)+3=5
Both one-sided limits are equal to 5, so the two-sided limit exists and is 5. Condition 2 is satisfied.
For any polynomial function, you never need to compute one-sided limits separately — the limit as x→a is always f(a). This is a theorem: polynomials are continuous everywhere. But checking both sides is good practice for more complicated functions.
Step 3: Check if limx→1f(x)=f(1).
We have:
limx→1f(x)=5andf(1)=5
They are equal. Condition 3 is satisfied.
All three conditions hold. Therefore, f is continuous at x=1.
A common mistake is to think that if a function is "smooth" or "simple", you can skip checking the conditions. Always verify all three — especially for piecewise functions or functions with holes, where the limit might exist but the function value might not, or vice versa.
The function f(x)=2x+3 is continuous at x=1.
Method: Checking Continuity at a Point
A function f is continuous at x=a only if all three of the following hold — checking just one or two is not a complete proof.
Steps
Step 1: Confirm f(a) exists
Evaluate the function directly at the point.
Step 2: Confirm x→alimf(x) exists
For most elementary functions this means checking that the left-hand limit and the right-hand limit are equal.
limx→a−f(x)=limx→a+f(x).
Step 3: Confirm the limit equals the function value
limx→af(x)=f(a).
If all three conditions hold, f is continuous at a; if any one fails, it is not.
Applying to this problem: for f(x)=2x+3 at x=1, f(1)=5, and both one-sided limits (and hence the two-sided limit) equal 5 since linear functions have no breaks — all three conditions hold, so f is continuous at x=1.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Skipping the one-sided-limit check because the function "looks obviously continuous".
Why it's wrong: even for a simple linear function, a rigorous continuity proof requires demonstrating the limit exists (via matching one-sided limits), not just asserting it from visual intuition — a board exam expects the explicit check. Correct approach: always state the left-hand and right-hand limits separately, even when they're evidently going to match.
Mistake 2: Confusing "continuous" with "differentiable" and answering the wrong question.
Why it's wrong: continuity only requires the limit to equal the function value — no statement about the function's derivative is needed or relevant here. Correct approach: keep the three-condition continuity check entirely separate from any discussion of differentiability.
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-05-AN1 markMCQQ.Let a,b,c be three real numbers. If the function
[!FORMULA] f(x)=⎩⎨⎧cos(2x+π)ax2+bcx+43a+1if x≤0if 0<x<1if 1≤x≤2if x≥2
is continuous everywhere, then b2−bc+c2= (A) 133 (B) 157 (C) 43 (D) 31›Reveal solutionSolution
Continuity at the three boundary points x=0, x=1, and x=2 gives three equations in a,b,c. Solving them yields a=−1, b=1, c=−11, so b2−bc+c2=1+11+121=133.
The key idea is that a piecewise function is continuous everywhere if and only if it is continuous at each boundary where the definition changes. At those points, the left-hand limit, right-hand limit, and the function’s value must all be equal. Here we have three boundaries: x=0, x=1, and x=2. Each gives one equation, and three unknowns (a,b,c) means we can solve uniquely.
Let’s work through each boundary carefully.
- Continuity at x=0 For x≤0, f(x)=cos(2x+π). At x=0, this gives f(0)=cos(π)=−1. For 0<x<1, f(x)=ax2+b. As x→0+, this approaches a(0)2+b=b. Continuity at x=0 requires
limx→0−f(x)=f(0)=limx→0+f(x)
so −1=b. Hence
b=−1.
- Continuity at x=1 For 0<x<1, f(x)=ax2+b. As x→1−, this approaches a(1)2+b=a+b. For 1≤x≤2, f(x)=cx+4. At x=1, this gives f(1)=c(1)+4=c+4. Continuity at x=1 requires
limx→1−f(x)=f(1)
so a+b=c+4. Substituting b=−1 gives
a−1=c+4⇒a−c=5.(1)
- Continuity at x=2 For 1≤x≤2, f(x)=cx+4. As x→2−, this approaches c(2)+4=2c+4. For x≥2, f(x)=3a+1. At x=2, this gives f(2)=3a+1. Continuity at x=2 requires
limx→2−f(x)=f(2)
so 2c+4=3a+1. Rearranging:
3a−2c=3.(2)
Now solve the system:
{a−c=53a−2c=3
From the first equation, a=c+5. Substitute into the second:
3(c+5)−2c=3⇒3c+15−2c=3⇒c+15=3⇒c=−12.
Then a=−12+5=−7. But wait — check: a=−7, c=−12? Let’s verify with equation (2): 3(−7)−2(−12)=−21+24=3, correct. So a=−7, b=−1, c=−12.
Now compute b2−bc+c2:
b2=(−1)2=1,−bc=−(−1)(−12)=−(12)=−12,c2=(−12)2=144.
Sum: 1−12+144=133.
Watch outA common slip is to forget that b came out as −1, not 1, and then mis-evaluate −bc as +12 instead of −12. Always substitute carefully with signs.
✓Final answerThe value is 133, which corresponds to option (A).
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-04-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=⎩⎨⎧1+cosx,a−x,x2−b2,x≤00<x≤2x>2 is continuous everywhere, then a2+b2= (A) 4 (B) 8 (C) 6 (D) 12
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a piecewise function to be continuous everywhere, it must be continuous at the points where its definition changes. By ensuring continuity at x=0 and x=2, we find a=2 and b2=4, leading to a2+b2=8.
A function is continuous everywhere if it is continuous at every point in its domain. For a piecewise function, the individual pieces are typically continuous within their defined intervals (polynomials and trigonometric functions are continuous). The critical points to check for continuity are the boundary points where the function's definition changes.
In this problem, the function f(x) is defined differently for x≤0, 0<x≤2, and x>2. The potential points of discontinuity are x=0 and x=2. For f(x) to be continuous everywhere, it must be continuous at these two points.
A function f(x) is continuous at a point c if and only if limx→c−f(x)=limx→c+f(x)=f(c).
We will apply this condition at x=0 and x=2 to find the values of a and b.
- Check continuity at x=0:
For f(x) to be continuous at x=0, the left-hand limit, right-hand limit, and the function value at x=0 must all be equal.
- Left-hand limit at x=0: For x<0, f(x)=1+cosx.
limx→0−f(x)=limx→0−(1+cosx)=1+cos(0)=1+1=2
* **Right-hand limit at $x=0$**: For $x > 0$, $f(x) = a - x$.limx→0+f(x)=limx→0+(a−x)=a−0=a
* **Function value at $x=0$**: For $x \leq 0$, $f(x) = 1 + \cos x$.f(0)=1+cos(0)=1+1=2
For continuity at $x=0$, we must have $\lim_{x \to 0^-} f(x) = \lim_{x \to 0^+} f(x) = f(0)$. Therefore, $2 = a = 2$. This implies that $a=2$.2. Check continuity at x=2:
Similarly, for f(x) to be continuous at x=2, the left-hand limit, right-hand limit, and the function value at x=2 must all be equal.
* Left-hand limit at x=2: For x<2, f(x)=a−x.
limx→2−f(x)=limx→2−(a−x)=a−2
* **Right-hand limit at $x=2$**: For $x > 2$, $f(x) = x^2 - b^2$.limx→2+f(x)=limx→2+(x2−b2)=22−b2=4−b2
* **Function value at $x=2$**: For $0 < x \leq 2$, $f(x) = a - x$.f(2)=a−2
For continuity at $x=2$, we must have $\lim_{x \to 2^-} f(x) = \lim_{x \to 2^+} f(x) = f(2)$. Therefore, $a - 2 = 4 - b^2 = a - 2$. This gives us the equation $a - 2 = 4 - b^2$.3. Solve for a and b and calculate a2+b2:
From step 1, we found a=2.
Substitute a=2 into the equation from step 2:
2−2=4−b2
0=4−b2
b2=4
Now we need to find $a^2 + b^2$.a2=22=4
b2=4
a2+b2=4+4=8
✓Final answerThe value of a2+b2 is 8.
- Check continuity at x=0:
For f(x) to be continuous at x=0, the left-hand limit, right-hand limit, and the function value at x=0 must all be equal.
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-AN1 markMCQQ.If [t] represents the greatest integer ≤t then the value of limx→3[x+10]11−[2−x] is (A) 1 (B) 8 (C) 5 (D) does not exist
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit involves the greatest integer function, which is discontinuous at integer arguments. As x→3, the expressions inside the floor brackets cross integer boundaries, so the left-hand and right-hand limits differ; therefore the limit does not exist.
Concept and intuition:
The greatest integer function [t] (also called the floor function) jumps at every integer. When we take a limit as x approaches a point, if the argument of the floor function passes through an integer, the floor value changes abruptly. That often makes the two-sided limit fail to exist. Here, as x→3, both [2−x] and [x+10] cross integer boundaries, so we must check the left and right separately.
-
Identify the critical integer boundaries.
For x→3, consider the expressions inside the floor functions:
- 2−x: when x=3, 2−3=−1. For x just less than 3, 2−x>−1; for x just greater than 3, 2−x<−1. So the floor [2−x] will change at x=3.
- x+10: when x=3, x+10=13. For x near 3, x+10 is near 13, but does it cross 13? Since 13 is an integer, we need to see if x+10 passes through 13 from below or above as x passes through 3. Actually, x+10=13 exactly at x=3. For x<3, x+10<13; for x>3, x+10>13. So [x+10] also changes at x=3.
-
Compute the left-hand limit (x→3−).
Let x=3−h with h→0+.
- 2−x=2−(3−h)=−1+h. Since h>0 small, −1+h is slightly greater than −1 but less than 0. Hence [2−x]=−1.
- x+10=(3−h)+10=13−h. Since h>0, 13−h is slightly less than 13, so [x+10]=12.
- The expression becomes 1211−(−1)=1212=1.
-
Compute the right-hand limit (x→3+).
Let x=3+h with h→0+.
- 2−x=2−(3+h)=−1−h. This is slightly less than −1, so [2−x]=−2.
- x+10=(3+h)+10=13+h. This is slightly greater than 13, so [x+10]=13.
- The expression becomes 1311−(−2)=1313=1.
-
Compare the two one-sided limits.
Both left-hand and right-hand limits equal 1. That suggests the two-sided limit might exist and equal 1. But wait — we must check carefully: is there any subtlety? The floor function is discontinuous, but if both sides give the same value, the limit exists. However, we must ensure that the denominator is never zero near x=3. Here [x+10] is 12 or 13, both nonzero, so no division by zero.
So the limit is 1.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume that because the floor function jumps, the limit automatically does not exist. But here the jumps in numerator and denominator compensate each other, giving the same value from both sides. Always compute one-sided limits explicitly.
TipWhen both floor expressions change at the same point, the ratio can sometimes remain continuous. Always test with x=3±ϵ to be safe.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-FN1 markMCQQ.If [t] represents the greatest integer ≤t then the value of limx→3[x+10]11−[2−x] is (A) 8 (B) does not exist (C) 5 (D) 1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Both one-sided limits equal 1, so the limit exists and equals 1, option (D).
We evaluate x→3lim[x+10]11−[2−x], where [t] is the greatest integer ≤t.
Left-hand limit (x→3−): take x slightly less than 3 (e.g. x=2.9).
2−x=−0.9⇒[2−x]=−1,x+10=12.9⇒[x+10]=12.
So the expression is 1211−(−1)=1212=1.
Right-hand limit (x→3+): take x slightly more than 3 (e.g. x=3.1).
2−x=−1.1⇒[2−x]=−2,x+10=13.1⇒[x+10]=13.
So the expression is 1311−(−2)=1313=1.
Both one-sided limits equal 1, so the limit exists:
limx→3[x+10]11−[2−x]=1.
✓Final answerThe value of the limit is 1 — option (D).
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.If the function f(x)=⎩⎨⎧x−1tana(x−1),x2−25x3−125,xbx−1,if 0<x<1if 1≤x≤4if x>4 is continuous in its domain, then 6a+9b4= (A) 284 (B) 261 (C) 214 (D) 317
›Reveal solutionSolution
The function is continuous on its domain if the left-hand and right-hand limits match at the two transition points x=1 and x=4. Solving the resulting equations gives a=2 and b=3, so 6a+9b4=6(2)+9(81)=12+729=741. Wait — that’s not among the options, so we must re-check the domain and the pieces carefully. The correct values are a=2 and b=3, but the expression yields 741, which is not listed. Let’s re-evaluate: actually, the second piece is defined for 1≤x≤4, so at x=4 we use that piece, and the third piece for x>4 must match its limit. Recomputing: at x=4, the second piece gives 16−2564−125=−9−61=961. The third piece’s limit as x→4+ is 4b4−1. Setting equal: 4b4−1=961⇒b4=9244+1=9253, not an integer. This suggests a misinterpretation: the domain is all x>0 except possibly x=1? Wait, the first piece is for 0<x<1, second for 1≤x≤4, third for x>4. At x=1, the first piece’s limit is limx→1−x−1tana(x−1)=a (since tanu/u→1). The second piece at x=1 gives 1−251−125=−24−124=631. So continuity at x=1 requires a=631. Then at x=4, second piece gives 16−2564−125=−9−61=961. Third piece limit: limx→4+xbx−1=4b4−1. Set equal: 4b4−1=961⇒b4=9244+1=9253. Then 6a+9b4=6⋅631+9⋅9253=31+253=284. So the correct option is (A).
Continuity at the boundaries x=1 and x=4 forces a=631 and b4=9253, giving 6a+9b4=284. The answer is option (A).
Concept & Intuition
A piecewise function is continuous on its domain if it doesn’t “jump” at the points where the formula changes. At each such boundary, the left-hand limit (from the piece before) must equal the right-hand limit (from the piece after), and both must equal the function’s value there (if defined). Here the boundaries are x=1 and x=4. We compute the limits using standard calculus facts: limu→0utanu=1 and limu→0ubu−1=logb (but careful — the third piece is xbx−1 as x→4+, not near 0, so we just plug in directly). The second piece is a rational function that simplifies.
Step-by-step solution
- Continuity at x=1 For 0<x<1, f(x)=x−1tana(x−1). Let u=x−1; as x→1−, u→0−. Then
limx→1−f(x)=limu→0utan(au)=a⋅limu→0autan(au)=a⋅1=a.
For 1≤x≤4, at x=1 we have
f(1)=12−2513−125=−24−124=631.
Continuity requires limx→1−f(x)=f(1), so
a=631.
- Continuity at x=4 For 1≤x≤4, at x=4:
f(4)=42−2543−125=16−2564−125=−9−61=961.
For x>4, f(x)=xbx−1. The limit as x→4+ is simply
limx→4+xbx−1=4b4−1.
Continuity demands
4b4−1=961.
Multiply both sides by 36: 9(b4−1)=244⇒9b4−9=244⇒9b4=253⇒b4=9253.
- Compute 6a+9b4 Substitute a=631 and b4=9253:
6a=6⋅631=31,9b4=9⋅9253=253.
Hence
6a+9b4=31+253=284.
Watch outA common mistake is to treat the third piece as a limit as x→0 (using logb), but here x→4+, so it’s a direct substitution — no derivative formula needed.
TipNotice the second piece x2−25x3−125 simplifies to (x−5)(x+5)(x−5)(x2+5x+25)=x+5x2+5x+25 for x=5, but since x is between 1 and 4, it’s safe. At x=4 that gives 916+20+25=961, matching our calculation.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A).
ANSWER: A
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.If the function f(x)=x3+ax2+bx+40 satisfies the conditions of Rolle's theorem on the interval [−5,4] and −5,4 are two roots of the equation f(x)=0, then one of the values of c as stated in that theorem is (A) 3 (B) 31+67 (C) 31+65 (D) −2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rolle’s theorem guarantees a point c in (−5,4) where f′(c)=0. Given that −5 and 4 are roots, we find a and b from the cubic’s factorization, then solve f′(c)=0 to get c=31+65, which matches option (C).
Concept & Intuition
Rolle’s theorem says: if a function is continuous on [p,q], differentiable on (p,q), and f(p)=f(q), then there is at least one c in (p,q) with f′(c)=0. Here we are told −5 and 4 are roots, so f(−5)=0 and f(4)=0. That gives f(−5)=f(4)=0, satisfying the equal‑value condition. The theorem then guarantees some c in (−5,4) where the derivative is zero. Our job: find the cubic’s coefficients from the root information, then solve f′(c)=0 and pick the c that lies in the interval.
Step‑by‑step solution
- Use the root information to find a and b. Since −5 and 4 are roots, the cubic f(x)=x3+ax2+bx+40 must be divisible by (x+5)(x−4)=x2+x−20. Let the third root be r. Then
f(x)=(x+5)(x−4)(x−r)=(x2+x−20)(x−r).
Expand:
(x2+x−20)(x−r)=x3+(1−r)x2+(−20−r)x+20r.
Compare with x3+ax2+bx+40:
- Coefficient of x2: a=1−r
- Coefficient of x: b=−20−r
- Constant term: 20r=40⟹r=2.
So a=1−2=−1 and b=−20−2=−22.
Thus
f(x)=x3−x2−22x+40.
- Apply Rolle’s theorem: find f′(x) and set it to zero.
f′(x)=3x2−2x−22.
Solve f′(c)=0:
3c2−2c−22=0.
Quadratic formula:
c=62±4+264=62±268=62±267=31±67.
-
Check which c lies in (−5,4).
- 31−67: 67≈8.185, so numerator ≈−7.185, divided by 3 gives ≈−2.395. This is in (−5,4).
- 31+67: numerator ≈9.185, divided by 3 gives ≈3.062. Also in (−5,4).
Both are valid by Rolle’s theorem, but the multiple‑choice options only include one of them: 31+67 appears as option (B). Wait — check the options again:
(A) 3
(B) 31+67
(C) 31+65
(D) −2
Our computed values are 31±67. Option (B) is 31+67. Option (C) has 65, which is different. So the correct match is (B).
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that both roots of f′(c)=0 are valid candidates — but the problem asks for “one of the values of c”, so any correct one from the list works. Here only 31+67 appears.
TipThe constant term 40 gave the third root immediately: since the product of the three roots is −40 (for a monic cubic), and two roots are −5 and 4 (product −20), the third root must be 2. That’s faster than expanding.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
ANSWER: B
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-05-AN1 markMCQQ.If f:R→R is a differentiable function at a∈R such that f′(a)=af(a), then
[!FORMULA] limx→ax−axf(a)−af(x)=
(A) (1−a2)f(a) (B) af(a) (C) af(a) (D) 1−a2f(a)›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit is in an indeterminate 00 form. By algebraically manipulating the numerator to use the definition of the derivative, and then applying the given condition f′(a)=af(a), the limit evaluates to (1−a2)f(a).
When evaluating limits, especially those involving differentiable functions, the first step is always to substitute the limiting value to check for indeterminate forms. If we encounter 00 or ∞∞, it indicates that further analysis is required, often involving L'Hôpital's Rule or algebraic manipulation to use the definition of the derivative.
The definition of the derivative is a fundamental concept:
f′(a)=limx→ax−af(x)−f(a)
Our strategy will be to transform the given limit expression into a form that allows us to directly apply this definition. This usually involves adding and subtracting a specific term in the numerator to create the necessary (f(x)−f(a)) and (x−a) components.
Here's how we can solve the problem:
-
Check for indeterminate form:
Let's substitute x=a into the given expression:
Numerator: af(a)−af(a)=0
Denominator: a−a=0
Since we have the indeterminate form 00, we can proceed with further evaluation.
-
Manipulate the numerator:
The numerator is xf(a)−af(x). To use the definition of the derivative, we need terms like f(x)−f(a). Notice that we have af(x). If we could pair it with af(a), we would get a(f(x)−f(a)).
Let's add and subtract af(a) in the numerator:
xf(a)−af(x)=xf(a)−af(a)+af(a)−af(x)
Now, we can factor terms:=f(a)(x−a)−a(f(x)−f(a))
- Substitute back into the limit and split: Substitute this manipulated numerator back into the limit expression:
limx→ax−af(a)(x−a)−a(f(x)−f(a))
Now, split the fraction into two separate terms:limx→a(x−af(a)(x−a)−x−aa(f(x)−f(a)))
As $x \to a$, $x-a \neq 0$, so we can cancel the $(x-a)$ term in the first part:limx→a(f(a)−ax−af(x)−f(a))
- Evaluate the limits: Using the properties of limits, we can evaluate each part separately:
limx→af(a)−alimx→ax−af(x)−f(a)
Since $f(a)$ is a constant with respect to $x$:limx→af(a)=f(a)
By the definition of the derivative:limx→ax−af(x)−f(a)=f′(a)
So, the expression becomes:f(a)−af′(a)
- Apply the given condition: The problem states that f′(a)=af(a). Substitute this into our result:
f(a)−a(af(a))
=f(a)−a2f(a)
Factor out $f(a)$:=f(a)(1−a2)
TipAlternatively, you could use L'Hôpital's Rule since the limit is in the 00 form. Differentiate the numerator and denominator with respect to x:
dxd(xf(a)−af(x))=f(a)⋅1−a⋅f′(x)=f(a)−af′(x)
dxd(x−a)=1
So the limit becomes limx→a1f(a)−af′(x)=f(a)−af′(a).
Substituting f′(a)=af(a) gives f(a)−a(af(a))=f(a)(1−a2), which is the same result.
✓Final answerThe value of the limit is (1−a2)f(a).
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.If x=t−sint, y=1−cost and dx2d2y=−1 at t=K, K>0, then t→Klimxy= (A) π2 (B) 2π−2 (C) π−22 (D) 2π
›Reveal solutionSolution
We are given a cycloid parametrization; the condition dx2d2y=−1 at t=K>0 determines K, and then the limit limt→Ky/x simplifies to a constant that matches one of the options.
Concept and intuition
The equations x=t−sint, y=1−cost describe a cycloid. Derivatives with respect to x are computed via parametric formulas:
dxdy=dx/dtdy/dt,dx2d2y=dx/dtdtd(dxdy).
The condition dx2d2y=−1 gives an equation for t, which we solve for K>0. Then limt→Ky/x is simply y(K)/x(K) because both are continuous at K (and x(K)=0).
Step-by-step solution
- Compute first derivatives
dtdx=1−cost,dtdy=sint.
Hence
dxdy=1−costsint.
- Simplify dxdy using a half-angle identity Recall 1−cost=2sin2(t/2) and sint=2sin(t/2)cos(t/2). Then
dxdy=2sin2(t/2)2sin(t/2)cos(t/2)=cot(t/2),
provided sin(t/2)=0 (which holds for t>0 not a multiple of 2π).
- Compute dx2d2y First,
dtd(dxdy)=dtdcot(t/2)=−21csc2(t/2).
Then
dx2d2y=dx/dt−21csc2(t/2)=1−cost−21csc2(t/2).
Using 1−cost=2sin2(t/2), we get
dx2d2y=2sin2(t/2)−21csc2(t/2)=−41csc4(t/2).
- Apply the given condition Set dx2d2y=−1:
−41csc4(t/2)=−1⇒csc4(t/2)=4.
Hence csc2(t/2)=2 (positive), so sin2(t/2)=1/2, i.e. sin(t/2)=1/2 (since t>0 and we take the positive root for the smallest positive K).
Thus t/2=π/4 (or 3π/4, etc.), but K>0 and the simplest is t/2=π/4, giving
K=2π.
- Evaluate the limit Since x(t) and y(t) are continuous at t=K and x(K)=0,
limt→Kxy=x(K)y(K).
At t=π/2:
x=2π−sin2π=2π−1,y=1−cos2π=1−0=1.
Therefore
xy=2π−11=π−22.
TipThe half-angle simplification avoids messy algebra and directly gives dxdy=cot(t/2), making the second derivative computation clean.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that dx2d2y is not d2x/dt2d2y/dt2; always use the parametric formula.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-09-FN1 markMCQQ.limx→0sinx3sinx−2tanx= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) loge6 (D) loge23
›Reveal solutionSolution
This limit is a classic indeterminate form 00 that we resolve by rewriting each exponential as esomething and using the standard limit ueu−1→1. The final value is log23, so the correct option is (D).
Concept & Intuition
When x→0, both sinx and tanx go to 0, so 3sinx→30=1 and 2tanx→1. The numerator becomes 1−1=0, denominator also 0, so we have a 00 form.
The trick: write af(x)=ef(x)loga. Then near 0, eu−1≈u, which lets us replace exponentials by linear approximations. This reduces the limit to a combination of xsinx and xtanx limits.
Step-by-step solution
- Rewrite the exponentials
3sinx=esinx⋅log3,2tanx=etanx⋅log2.
So the numerator becomes
esinxlog3−etanxlog2.
- Add and subtract 1 to create a standard form Write
sinxesinxlog3−etanxlog2=sinx(esinxlog3−1)−(etanxlog2−1).
This is valid because 1−1=0.
- Split into two limits
limx→0sinxesinxlog3−1−limx→0sinxetanxlog2−1.
- First limit Let u=sinxlog3. As x→0, u→0. Then
sinxeu−1=ueu−1⋅sinxu=ueu−1⋅log3.
Since limu→0ueu−1=1, the first limit is log3.
- Second limit Here we have sinxetanxlog2−1. Let v=tanxlog2, so v→0. Then
sinxev−1=vev−1⋅sinxv=vev−1⋅log2⋅sinxtanx.
Now sinxtanx=cosx1→1 as x→0. So the second limit is log2.
- Combine The original limit equals log3−log2=log23.
TipNotice we never needed L'Hôpital's rule — the key was isolating ueu−1→1 and using sinxtanx→1.
Watch outA common mistake is to directly replace 3sinx with 1+sinxlog3 and 2tanx with 1+tanxlog2, then subtract to get sinxsinxlog3−tanxlog2. That gives log3−log2⋅sinxtanx, which also works — but only if you remember sinxtanx→1. The method above is more rigorous.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-18-FN1 markMCQQ.limx→0x222x−2x+1+2−cos2x= (A) 2+log2 (B) 2+(log2)2 (C) 2+(log4)2 (D) 2+log4
›Reveal solutionSolution
The limit is evaluated by expanding the numerator using series expansions for exponentials and cosine, cancelling the x2 denominator, and yields 2+(log2)2, which corresponds to option (B).
We need to find
limx→0x222x−2x+1+2−cos2x.
Direct substitution gives 00, so we must use series expansions. The key idea: expand each term as a power series in x, keep terms up to x2, and simplify.
- Expand 22x Recall abx=ebxloga. So
22x=e2xlog2=1+(2log2)x+2!(2log2)2x2+O(x3).
That is
22x=1+2(log2)x+2(log2)2x2+O(x3).
- Expand 2x+1 Write 2x+1=2⋅2x=2exlog2. Then
2x+1=2[1+(log2)x+2(log2)2x2+O(x3)]=2+2(log2)x+(log2)2x2+O(x3).
- Expand cos2x
cos2x=1−2!(2x)2+O(x4)=1−2x2+O(x4).
- Assemble the numerator The numerator is
N=22x−2x+1+2−cos2x.
Substitute expansions:
N=[1+2(log2)x+2(log2)2x2]−[2+2(log2)x+(log2)2x2]+2−[1−2x2]+O(x3).
Combine constants: 1−2+2−1=0.
Combine x terms: 2(log2)x−2(log2)x=0.
Combine x2 terms: 2(log2)2x2−(log2)2x2+2x2=(log2)2x2+2x2.
So
N=[2+(log2)2]x2+O(x3).
- Divide by x2 and take the limit
x2N=2+(log2)2+O(x)⇒limx→0=2+(log2)2.
Since log2 is the natural logarithm, and the options use log to mean natural log (standard in calculus), (log2)2 matches option (B).
Watch outA common mistake is to forget the factor of 2 in the expansion of 2x+1 or to mishandle the cos2x expansion (e.g., using cosx instead). Always check constants and coefficients carefully.
TipNotice that (log4)2=(2log2)2=4(log2)2, which is not the same as (log2)2. So option (C) is a distractor.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B).
ANSWER: B
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-05-FN1 markMCQQ.limx→−∞−5∣x∣3+3x2−2∣x∣+73∣x∣3−x2+2∣x∣−5= (A) 53 (B) 7−5 (C) 75 (D) 5−3
›Reveal solutionSolution
For x→−∞, ∣x∣=−x, so the expression simplifies to a ratio of cubic terms; the limit is −53.
The key here is handling the absolute value correctly when x is heading to negative infinity. Many students treat ∣x∣ as x without thinking, which gives the wrong sign. Since x→−∞, we have x<0, so ∣x∣=−x. That single substitution turns the problem into a standard limit of a rational function in x.
- Replace ∣x∣ with −x. For x→−∞, x is negative, so ∣x∣=−x. Everywhere you see ∣x∣, put −x:
−5(−x)3+3x2−2(−x)+73(−x)3−x2+2(−x)−5
- Simplify the powers. (−x)3=−x3, so 3(−x)3=−3x3. In the denominator, −5(−x)3=−5(−x3)=5x3. Also 2(−x)=−2x and −2(−x)=2x. The expression becomes:
5x3+3x2+2x+7−3x3−x2−2x−5
- Take the limit as x→−∞. For a rational function where numerator and denominator are both cubic, the limit is the ratio of the leading coefficients. Divide every term by x3:
5+x3+x22+x37−3−x1−x22−x35
As x→−∞, all terms with x in the denominator go to 0, leaving:
5−3
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that ∣x∣=−x when x is negative. If you replace ∣x∣ with x instead, you get 53, which is option (A) — a tempting but wrong answer.
TipFor limits at ±∞ involving ∣x∣, always check the sign of x first. Write ∣x∣=−x for x→−∞ and ∣x∣=x for x→∞. Then proceed as usual with the highest-degree terms.
✓Final answerThe limit is −53, which corresponds to option (D).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.