Proof. The incentre I is equidistant (distance r) from all three sides. Joining I to A,B,C splits △ABC into three triangles IBC,ICA,IAB with heights r on bases a,b,c respectively. So Δ=21ar+21br+21cr=2r(a+b+c)=rs, giving r=Δ/s.
Theorem 2.r=(s−a)tan2A.
Proof. The tangent length from vertex A to the incircle is s−a (a standard tangent-length result: if the incircle touches AB at P and AC at Q, then AP=AQ=s−a). In the right triangle formed by A, the touch point P, and the incentre I, the angle at A is 2A (since AI bisects angle A), the side adjacent to this angle is AP=s−a, and the side opposite is IP=r. Hence tan2A=s−ar, i.e. r=(s−a)tan2A.
Theorem 3.r=4Rsin2Asin2Bsin2C.
Proof (sketch). Combine r=(s−a)tan2A with the half-angle formula tan2A=s(s−a)(s−b)(s−c) from §10.5: r=(s−a)s(s−a)(s−b)(s−c)=s(s−a)(s−b)(s−c)=ss(s−a)(s−b)(s−c)=sΔ, recovering Theorem 1 and confirming consistency. Writing Δ=2R2sinAsinBsinC (§10.6) and each sinA=2sin2Acos2A, then dividing by s=4Rcos2Acos2Bcos2C (itself obtainable from the projection-rule sum of §10.3 written in half-angle form) gives r=4Rsin2Asin2Bsin2C directly.
Worked example. For a=13,b=14,c=15: s=21,Δ=84, so r=Δ/s=84/21=4. This ties directly into Exercise 10(b), Q1.
A worked example combining SAS data. For A=60∘,b=8,c=10 (Exercise 10(b), Q3): first Δ=21bcsinA=21(8)(10)sin60∘=203, and a2=b2+c2−2bccosA=84⇒a=221, giving s=9+21. Then r=Δ/s=9+21203, which rationalises to 33−7≈2.550 — showing that even when the semi-perimeter is irrational, the inradius formula r=Δ/s still applies directly; it is simply a matter of careful rationalisation at the end. …