Q.2 g of benzoic acid (C6H5COOH) dissolved in 25 g of benzene shows a depression in freezing point equal to 1.62 K. Molal depression constant for benzene is 4.9 K kg mol−1. What is the percentage association of acid if it forms dimer in solution?
Concept understanding — Colligative Properties Association
Colligative Properties: The Intuition First
Imagine you're at a party. The room is full of people dancing — that's your solvent molecules, moving freely. Now, someone brings in a few heavy, slow-moving guests who just stand in one spot — those are your solute particles. They don't dance, they don't interact much, they just take up space.
What happens? The dancers now have less room to move. They bump into the standing guests more often. The whole atmosphere changes — the dancers can't move as freely, they can't escape the room as easily, and the overall "energy" of the party shifts.
That's the core idea of colligative properties. When you add a non-volatile solute (like salt) to a solvent (like water), the solute particles don't do anything special — they just exist in the solution. But their mere presence changes four measurable properties of the solvent:
- Vapour pressure decreases
- Boiling point increases
- Freezing point decreases
- Osmotic pressure increases
The key insight: these changes depend only on the number of solute particles, not on what kind of particles they are. One molecule of sugar and one ion of salt (if they don't dissociate) affect these properties identically — provided they're the same number of particles.
This is why "colligative" comes from the Latin colligatus meaning "bound together" — the properties are bound to the quantity of solute, not its identity.
The Precise Statement
Colligative properties are properties of a solution that depend solely on the ratio of the number of solute particles to the number of solvent molecules in a given solution, and not on the chemical nature of the solute.
Mathematically, for a dilute solution of a non-volatile, non-electrolyte solute:
ΔP=P0⋅x2
ΔTb=Kb⋅m
ΔTf=Kf⋅m
Π=i⋅MRT
Where:
- ΔP = lowering of vapour pressure
- P0 = vapour pressure of pure solvent
- x2 = mole fraction of solute
- ΔTb = elevation in boiling point
- Kb = ebullioscopic constant (depends only on solvent)
- m = molality of solution
- ΔTf = depression in freezing point
- Kf = cryoscopic constant (depends only on solvent)
- Π = osmotic pressure
- i = van't Hoff factor (accounts for dissociation/association)
- M = molarity
- R = gas constant
- T = absolute temperature
The Crucial Distinction: Association vs. Dissociation
Now, here's where the association part comes in — and it's the twist that catches most students.
The formulas above assume the solute particles remain as individual, independent particles. But in reality:
- Dissociation: Some solutes break apart into smaller particles (e.g., NaCl → Na⁺ + Cl⁻). This increases the number of particles, so the colligative effect is larger than expected.
- Association: Some solutes clump together into larger particles (e.g., acetic acid in benzene forms dimers: 2 CH₃COOH → (CH₃COOH)₂). This decreases the number of particles, so the colligative effect is smaller than expected.
A common mistake: students think "association" means the solute interacts with the solvent. No — association means solute particles bind to each other, reducing the effective particle count. Solvent-solute interactions affect non-colligative properties like solubility.
The van't Hoff Factor i
To account for these real-world effects, we introduce the van't Hoff factor:
i=Number of formula units dissolvedActual number of particles in solution
For a non-electrolyte that doesn't associate or dissociate: i=1
For dissociation (e.g., NaCl): i>1 (ideally 2 for NaCl)
For association (e.g., acetic acid dimerizing): i<1
The corrected formulas become:
ΔTb=i⋅Kb⋅m
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
Π=i⋅MRT
A Concrete Example
Consider acetic acid (CH₃COOH) dissolved in benzene. In benzene, acetic acid molecules form hydrogen-bonded dimers:
2CH3COOH⇌(CH3COOH)2
If you dissolve 1 mole of acetic acid, you might end up with only 0.6 moles of particles (0.4 moles of dimers + 0.2 moles of monomers). So i=0.6.
The freezing point depression will be only 60% of what you'd calculate assuming no association. If you didn't account for this, your experimental ΔTf would be smaller than predicted — and you'd know something is "associating" the particles.
Why This Matters for Exams
In Indian competitive exams (JEE, NEET, etc.), you'll often be asked to:
- Calculate i from given association/dissociation data
- Compare colligative effects for different solutes (e.g., which has higher boiling point: 0.1 M NaCl or 0.1 M glucose?)
- Determine the degree of association from experimental ΔTf or ΔTb data
For association problems, remember: if n molecules associate to form one aggregate, and α is the degree of association, then:
i=1−α+nα
For dimerization (n=2): i=1−2α
The Big Picture
Colligative properties are a beautiful example of how statistical behaviour emerges from simple counting. The solvent doesn't care if the solute is sugar, salt, or sand — it only cares how many particles are in its way. Association and dissociation are the real-world corrections that make the theory match experiment, and the van't Hoff factor is the elegant tool that bridges the gap.
When you see a colligative property problem, always ask yourself first: "How many particles are actually floating around in this solution?" That number — not the formula units you started with — is what determines the answer.
"Van't Hoff factor association and dissociation examples" and "colligative properties class 12 chemistry important questions" are frequent searches, both anchored in the Solutions chapter of the NCERT/CBSE Class 12 Chemistry curriculum. Distinguishing association from dissociation is a classic conceptual trap tested repeatedly in JEE Main and NEET.
Why this formula?
Colligative Properties & Association: Why the Formula Holds
Let's build this from first principles — understanding why association changes colligative properties, not just memorizing the formula.
The Core Idea: What Are Colligative Properties?
Colligative properties depend only on the number of solute particles in solution, not on their chemical identity. The four key ones are:
- Vapor pressure lowering
- Boiling point elevation
- Freezing point depression
- Osmotic pressure
When a solute associates (e.g., two molecules dimerize), the effective number of particles decreases. This is the entire reason the formula changes.
The van't Hoff Factor: The Bridge
We define the van't Hoff factor i as:
i=number of formula units dissolvedactual number of particles in solution
For a non-electrolyte that does not associate, i=1.
For association, i<1.
Example: Dimerization of Benzoic Acid in Benzene
Benzoic acid (C6H5COOH) forms dimers in benzene:
2C6H5COOH⇌(C6H5COOH)2
If we dissolve n moles of monomer, but only n/2 moles of dimer exist, then:
i=nn/2=0.5
Deriving the Modified Formula
Step 1: Start with the Normal Colligative Formula
For freezing point depression (the most common exam case):
ΔTf=Kf⋅m
where m is the molality of the solute (moles per kg solvent).
Step 2: Replace m with Effective Molality
Because only the number of particles matters, we replace m with i⋅m:
ΔTf=Kf⋅(i⋅m)
This is the general formula for any colligative property when association or dissociation occurs.
Step 3: Express i in Terms of Degree of Association
Let:
- α = degree of association (fraction of molecules that associate)
- n = number of molecules that combine to form one associated particle (e.g., n=2 for dimerization)
For a dimerization (n=2):
- Initially: 1 mole of monomer
- After association: (1−α) moles remain as monomer, and α/2 moles of dimer form
- Total particles = (1−α)+2α=1−2α
Thus:
i=11−2α=1−2α
General formula for association of n molecules:
i=1−α+nα=1−α(1−n1)
Why This Makes Physical Sense
- Association reduces particle count → i<1 → colligative effect is smaller than expected.
- If α=0 (no association), i=1 → back to normal formula.
- If α=1 (complete association into dimers), i=0.5 → half the freezing point depression.
Key Exam Formula Summary
For any colligative property with association:
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
where
i=1−α(1−n1)
- n = number of molecules associating (e.g., 2 for dimer, 3 for trimer)
- α = degree of association (between 0 and 1)
Common Pitfall to Avoid
Do not confuse association with dissociation:
- Dissociation (e.g., NaCl → Na⁺ + Cl⁻) → i>1
- Association (e.g., dimerization) → i<1
Both use the same modified formula ΔT=i⋅K⋅m, but the expression for i differs.
Final Takeaway
The formula holds because colligative properties count particles, and association reduces that count. The van't Hoff factor i is simply the ratio of actual particles to expected particles — and the derivation above shows exactly how association changes that ratio.
Concept: Colligative properties (freezing-point depression) combined with association equilibrium. When benzoic acid dimerizes in benzene, the effective number of particles decreases, reducing the observed depression below the theoretical value.
Step 1: Calculate theoretical molality (assuming no association)
Molar mass of benzoic acid = 122g mol−1
mtheoretical=1222×251000=30502000=0.656mol kg−1
Step 2: Find observed molality from experimental data
Using ΔTf=Kf⋅mobserved:
mobserved=4.91.62=0.331mol kg−1
Step 3: Apply van't Hoff factor and association formula
i=mtheoreticalmobserved=0.6560.331=0.504
For dimerization (2A⇌A2), if α is the degree of association:
i=1−2α
0.504=1−2α⟹α=2(1−0.504)=0.992
Percentage association = 0.992×100=99.2%
The percentage association of benzoic acid is 99.2%.
Benzoic acid dimerizes in benzene through hydrogen bonding. By comparing the observed freezing-point depression with the theoretical value (assuming no association), we find the van't Hoff factor i=0.504, which corresponds to 99.2% association into dimers.
Why colligative properties reveal molecular association
Freezing-point depression depends only on the number of solute particles, not their identity. When benzoic acid molecules associate into dimers through hydrogen bonding, the total particle count drops below what we'd expect from isolated molecules. The van't Hoff factor i captures this deviation: i<1 signals association, and by measuring how much smaller i is, we can calculate the fraction of molecules that have paired up.
The key relationship is:
ΔTf=i⋅Kf⋅m
where m is the molality calculated as if no association occurred.
Step-by-step solution
1. Calculate the theoretical molality (assuming no association)
The molar mass of benzoic acid C6H5COOH is:
M=7(12)+6(1)+2(16)=122 g mol−1
Moles of benzoic acid dissolved:
n=1222=0.01639 mol
Molality (moles per kg of solvent):
m=0.0250.01639=0.6557 mol kg−1
2. Find the van't Hoff factor from observed depression
The observed freezing-point depression is ΔTf=1.62 K. Rearranging the colligative property equation:
i=Kf⋅mΔTf=4.9×0.65571.62=3.2131.62=0.504
This matches the book's own route: the experimentally observed molar mass is Mobs=1.62×254.9×2×1000=241.98 g mol−1, so i=241.98122=0.504.
A common mistake is to use the actual (associated) molality instead of the theoretical molality in this calculation. The van't Hoff factor compares observed behavior to ideal (non-associated) behavior.
3. Relate the van't Hoff factor to the degree of association
When benzoic acid forms dimers:
2C6H5COOH⇌(C6H5COOH)2
Let α be the degree of association (fraction of molecules that dimerize). Starting with 1 mole:
- Monomers remaining: 1−α
- Dimers formed: 2α
- Total particles: (1−α)+2α=1−2α
The van't Hoff factor is:
i=1−2α
4. Solve for the degree of association
0.504=1−2α
2α=1−0.504=0.496
α=0.992
5. Convert to percentage
Percentage association:
Association=0.992×100=99.2%
For dimerization, i ranges from 0.5 (complete association) to 1.0 (no association). Our value of 0.504 is very close to 0.5, indicating nearly complete dimerization—consistent with the strong hydrogen bonding capability of carboxylic acids in non-polar solvents like benzene.
The percentage association of benzoic acid is 99.2%.
Method: Van't Hoff Factor Approach for Association
This problem uses the Van't Hoff factor (i) to account for the association of benzoic acid into dimers in benzene.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1: Calculate the theoretical (expected) molality
If no association occurred, the molality would be:
- Molar mass of benzoic acid (C6H5COOH) = 7×12+6×1+2×16=122 g/mol
- Moles of acid = 1222=0.01639 mol
- Mass of benzene = 25 g = 0.025 kg
Theoretical molality:
mtheoretical=0.0250.01639=0.6556 mol/kg
Step 2: Calculate the observed (actual) molality from freezing point depression
Using ΔTf=Kf×mobserved:
mobserved=KfΔTf=4.91.62=0.3306 mol/kg
Step 3: Find the Van't Hoff factor
i=mtheoreticalmobserved=0.65560.3306=0.504
(This is the same i the book obtains via the observed molar mass: i=241.98122=0.504.)
Step 4: Relate i to degree of association (α)
For dimerization: 2A⇌A2
If α fraction of acid associates into dimers:
- Moles of monomer left = 1−α
- Moles of dimer formed = α/2
- Total moles after association = (1−α)+α/2=1−α/2
The Van't Hoff factor is:
i=moles before associationmoles after association=1−2α
Step 5: Solve for α
0.504=1−2α
2α=0.496
α=0.992
Step 6: Express as percentage
Percentage association=α×100=99.2%
Final Answer:
99.2% of benzoic acid molecules associate into dimers in benzene solution.
Here are the common mistakes students make on this exact problem, along with how to avoid each one.
1. Confusing Observed Molar Mass with Normal Molar Mass
The Mistake:
Students often plug the given mass (2 g) and mass of solvent (25 g) directly into the formula for molar mass without first calculating the observed molar mass from the freezing point depression.
How to Avoid:
Always separate the two steps:
- Find observed molar mass (Mobs) using:
Mobs=ΔTf×wsolventKf×wsolute×1000
where wsolute=2 g, wsolvent=25 g, Kf=4.9 K kg mol−1, ΔTf=1.62 K.
- Find normal molar mass (Mnormal) from the molecular formula:
Mnormal=7(12)+6(1)+2(16)=122 g/mol
Only then compare them.
2. Using the Wrong Formula for Association
The Mistake:
Students sometimes use the dissociation formula (i=1+α) for association problems.
How to Avoid:
For dimer formation (2 molecules → 1 dimer), the van’t Hoff factor is:
i=1−2α
where α is the fraction of molecules that associate.
- If all molecules dimerize (α=1), then i=0.5.
- If none dimerize (α=0), then i=1.
3. Forgetting the Relationship Between i and Molar Mass
The Mistake:
Students calculate i but then don’t connect it correctly to α.
How to Avoid:
Remember:
i=MobsMnormal
Then set:
MobsMnormal=1−2α
Solve for α:
α=2(1−MobsMnormal)
4. Calculation Errors in Mobs
The Mistake:
Mixing up units — especially forgetting to convert grams of solvent to kilograms.
How to Avoid:
Always write the formula with units:
Mobs=1.62×254.9×2×1000
- Kf is in K kg mol⁻¹ → solvent mass must be in kg (hence ×1000).
- Double-check arithmetic: Numerator = 4.9×2×1000=9800 Denominator = 1.62×25=40.5 Mobs=40.59800≈241.98 g/mol
5. Interpreting the Percentage Incorrectly
The Mistake:
Stopping at α=0.5 and writing “50%” without checking if it’s the percentage of molecules associated.
How to Avoid:
- α is the fraction of molecules that associate.
- Percentage association = α×100%.
- In this problem:
i=241.98122≈0.504
0.504=1−2α⇒α=0.992
Percentage association = 99.2% (nearly complete dimerization).
Quick Checklist to Avoid Mistakes
| Step | What to Do |
|---|---|
| 1 | Calculate Mobs from ΔTf data |
| 2 | Calculate Mnormal from formula |
| 3 | Find i=Mnormal/Mobs |
| 4 | Use i=1−α/2 for dimerization |
| 5 | Solve for α and multiply by 100% |
Final Answer:
99.2%
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-FN1 markMCQQ.The relative lowering of vapour pressure of an aqueous solution containing a non-volatile solute is 0.0125. The molality of the solution is (A) 0.65 m (B) 0.35 m (C) 0.70 m (D) 0.30 m
›Reveal solutionSolution
The relative lowering of vapour pressure equals the mole fraction of the solute; converting mole fraction to molality for a dilute aqueous solution gives the answer. The molality is approximately 0.70 m, so the correct option is (C).
Concept & Intuition
Raoult’s law for a non‑volatile solute tells us that the relative lowering of vapour pressure is exactly equal to the mole fraction of the solute in the solution:
P0P0−P=xsolute
Here the given value is 0.0125, so xsolute=0.0125.
We need molality (moles of solute per kg of solvent). For a dilute aqueous solution, the mole fraction of solute is small, so the mole fraction of water is nearly 1. This lets us convert directly:
xsolute=nsolute+nwaternsolute≈nwaternsolute
since nsolute≪nwater. Then molality m=kg of waternsolute. For water, 1 kg contains 1000/18≈55.56 moles. So nwater≈55.56 per kg. Thus:
m≈xsolute×55.56
Step‑by‑step calculation
- Write the exact relation
xsolute=nsolute+nwaternsolute=0.0125
- Express in terms of molality Let m be molality (mol solute per kg water). For 1 kg water, nwater=181000=55.555… mol. Then nsolute=m. So:
0.0125=m+55.555m
- Solve for m Multiply both sides:
0.0125(m+55.555)=m
0.0125m+0.69444=m
0.69444=m−0.0125m=0.9875m
m=0.98750.69444≈0.703
- Round to two decimal places m≈0.70 m.
TipFor very dilute solutions, the approximation m≈xsolute×55.56 gives 0.0125×55.56=0.6945, which is already 0.69–0.70 m — a quick check that saves time in a multiple‑choice setting.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that the mole fraction uses total moles, not just solvent moles. Using xsolute=55.56m directly (without the denominator correction) gives 0.694, which is close but not exact. For this problem both give option (C), but in general the exact formula is safer.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.At 300K, enthalpies of formation of C6H5COOH (s), CO2(g) and H2O (l) are −409, −393 and −286 kJ mol−1 respectively. Enthalpy of combustion of benzoic acid (in kJ mol−1) is (A) −1600 (B) +1600 (C) −3200 (D) +4800
›Reveal solutionSolution
The enthalpy of combustion is found by applying Hess’s law: the combustion reaction is written, then the enthalpy change is calculated as the sum of the enthalpies of formation of products minus that of the reactant. The result is –3200 kJ mol⁻¹, option (C).
The key idea here is that enthalpy of combustion is just a special case of enthalpy of reaction. For any reaction,
ΔHreaction=∑ΔHf∘(products)−∑ΔHf∘(reactants)
where ΔHf∘ is the standard enthalpy of formation. Combustion means burning in excess oxygen to give CO₂(g) and H₂O(l) as the only products. So we first write the balanced combustion equation for benzoic acid, then plug in the given formation enthalpies.
- Write the balanced combustion reaction Benzoic acid is C₆H₅COOH. Its molecular formula is C₇H₆O₂. Complete combustion with O₂ gives CO₂ and H₂O:
C7H6O2(s)+215O2(g)→7CO2(g)+3H2O(l)
Check: left has 7 C, 6 H, 2 + 15 = 17 O; right has 7×2 + 3×1 = 17 O. Balanced.
- Apply Hess’s law The enthalpy of combustion is ΔHcomb=ΔHreaction for this equation. Using formation enthalpies:
ΔHcomb=[7⋅ΔHf∘(CO2)+3⋅ΔHf∘(H2O)]−[1⋅ΔHf∘(C7H6O2)+215⋅ΔHf∘(O2)]
Note: ΔHf∘ for any element in its standard state (like O₂ gas) is zero by definition. So the O₂ term vanishes.
- Substitute the given values ΔHf∘(CO2)=−393 kJ/mol, ΔHf∘(H2O)=−286 kJ/mol, ΔHf∘(C7H6O2)=−409 kJ/mol.
ΔHcomb=[7(−393)+3(−286)]−[(−409)]
Compute stepwise:
7×(−393)=−2751
3×(−286)=−858
Sum of products = −2751−858=−3609 kJ
Subtract reactant: −3609−(−409)=−3609+409=−3200 kJ/mol.
- Interpret the sign The negative sign confirms that combustion is exothermic — heat is released. The magnitude is 3200 kJ per mole of benzoic acid.
Watch outA common mistake is forgetting that O₂ has zero enthalpy of formation, or misbalancing the equation (e.g., using wrong coefficients for CO₂ or H₂O). Always double-check atom counts.
TipYou can also think of this as: the enthalpy of combustion equals the enthalpy of formation of the products minus that of the reactant, because O₂ contributes nothing. This shortcut saves time in multiple-choice questions.
✓Final answerThe enthalpy of combustion of benzoic acid is –3200 kJ mol⁻¹, which corresponds to option (C).
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.A metal crystallizes in bcc lattice with an edge length of 4 Å. How many metal atoms can be placed in a two-dimensional open box of length 35 Å and width 35 Å? (A) 10 (B) 50 (C) 100 (D) 200
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to treat the two-dimensional box as a grid where each atom occupies a square of side equal to the nearest neighbour distance in the bcc lattice. For bcc, the nearest neighbour distance is 23a, and with a=4 Å that gives 23≈3.46 Å. The number of atoms that fit along each side is ⌊3.4635⌋=10, so the total is 10×10=100. The correct option is (C).
The problem asks how many metal atoms can be placed in a two-dimensional open box of length 35 Å and width 35 Å, given that the metal crystallizes in a bcc lattice with edge length 4 Å. The phrase "two-dimensional open box" means we are arranging atoms in a flat, square region — essentially a grid — and we need to know the spacing between atoms in the bcc structure when projected onto a plane.
In a bcc lattice, atoms touch along the body diagonal, not along the edge. The nearest neighbour distance is half the body diagonal: 23a. For a=4 Å, this distance is 23×4=23≈3.464 Å. This is the centre-to-centre distance between adjacent atoms in the lattice. When placing atoms in a box, each atom effectively occupies a square of side equal to this distance (since we cannot overlap atoms and they must be placed at lattice positions).
Now, we simply see how many such spacings fit along each dimension of the box.
-
Find the spacing between atoms.
In bcc, the nearest neighbour distance d=23a=23 Å. This is the minimum centre-to-centre separation.
-
Number of atoms along one side.
Along a length of 35 Å, the number of atoms that can be placed is the integer part of 35/d, because you need one full spacing per atom (the first atom can be at one edge, then each subsequent atom requires a full d distance). So
n=⌊2335⌋=⌊3.46435⌋=⌊10.10⌋=10.
-
Same for the other side.
The width is also 35 Å, so the same calculation gives 10 atoms along that direction.
-
Total atoms in the square box.
The arrangement is a grid of 10×10=100 atoms.
Watch outA common mistake is to use the edge length a=4 Å as the spacing between atoms. But in bcc, atoms do not touch along the edge — the nearest neighbour is along the body diagonal. Using a would give ⌊35/4⌋=8 per side, leading to 64 atoms, which is incorrect.
TipFor any cubic lattice, the key is to identify the actual nearest neighbour distance. In bcc it's 23a, in fcc it's 2a, and in simple cubic it's a. Always ask: "Along which direction do the atoms touch?"
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C), 100 atoms.
-
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.At 300 K, the vapour pressure of toluene and benzene are 3.63 kPa and 9.7 kPa respectively. What is the composition of vapour in equilibrium with the solution containing 0.4 mole fraction of toluene? (Assume the solution is ideal) (A) 0.40 (B) 0.60 (C) 0.80 (D) 0.20
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using Raoult’s law for an ideal solution, the vapour mole fraction of toluene is found to be 0.20, so the correct option is (D).
Concept & Intuition
This problem is about vapour composition above an ideal liquid mixture. Raoult’s law tells us that the partial pressure of each component in the vapour equals its mole fraction in the liquid times its pure vapour pressure. The total pressure is the sum of these partial pressures. The vapour composition is then the ratio of a component’s partial pressure to the total pressure. The key insight: even if the liquid has equal amounts of two substances, the vapour will be richer in the more volatile component (the one with higher pure vapour pressure). Here, benzene is more volatile than toluene, so the vapour should contain more benzene than the liquid does.
Step-by-step solution
- Identify the given data
- Temperature: T=300 K
- Pure vapour pressure of toluene: Ptoluene∘=3.63 kPa
- Pure vapour pressure of benzene: Pbenzene∘=9.7 kPa
- Mole fraction of toluene in the liquid: xtoluene=0.4
- Since it’s a binary mixture, mole fraction of benzene in the liquid:
xbenzene=1−xtoluene=0.6
- Apply Raoult’s law to find partial pressures
Raoult’s law: Pi=xiPi∘
- Partial pressure of toluene:
Ptoluene=0.4×3.63=1.452 kPa
- Partial pressure of benzene:
Pbenzene=0.6×9.7=5.82 kPa
- Calculate total vapour pressure
Ptotal=Ptoluene+Pbenzene=1.452+5.82=7.272 kPa
- Find vapour composition The mole fraction of a component in the vapour equals its partial pressure divided by the total pressure:
ytoluene=PtotalPtoluene=7.2721.452≈0.1997≈0.20
So the vapour contains about 20% toluene and 80% benzene.
Watch outA common mistake is to assume the vapour composition equals the liquid composition. Here the liquid is 40% toluene, but the vapour is only 20% toluene — because benzene is more volatile, it enriches the vapour.
TipYou can also solve directly:
ytoluene=xtoluenePtoluene∘+(1−xtoluene)Pbenzene∘xtoluenePtoluene∘
This one-step formula avoids computing total pressure separately.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D).
ANSWER: D
- Identify the given data
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-14-FN1 markMCQQ.At 50 ∘C, the vapour pressure of pure benzene is 268 torr. The number of moles of non-volatile solute per mole of benzene required to prepare a solution having a vapour pressure of 167 torr at the same temperature is (molar mass of benzene = 78 g mol−1) (A) 0.505 (B) 0.705 (C) 0.605 (D) 0.405
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using Raoult’s law for a non‑volatile solute, the mole fraction of benzene in the solution equals the ratio of its vapour pressure to that of pure benzene. From that, the required moles of solute per mole of benzene is found to be 0.605, corresponding to option (C).
Concept & Intuition
When a non‑volatile solute is dissolved in a volatile solvent, the vapour pressure of the solvent above the solution is lowered. Raoult’s law states that the vapour pressure of the solvent in the solution (p) equals the vapour pressure of the pure solvent (p∘) multiplied by its mole fraction in the liquid phase:
p=xsolventp∘
Here, the solute does not contribute to the vapour, so the entire vapour pressure comes from benzene. The problem asks for the number of moles of solute per mole of benzene — that is, the ratio nsolute/nbenzene. If we let nB=1 mole of benzene, then the mole fraction of benzene is
xB=1+nsolute1
and we can solve for nsolute.
Step‑by‑step solution
- Write Raoult’s law for the solution Given: p∘=268 torr (pure benzene vapour pressure) p=167 torr (solution vapour pressure)
p=xBp∘⇒167=xB×268
- Solve for the mole fraction of benzene
xB=268167
Simplify the fraction:
xB=268167≈0.62313
- Express xB in terms of moles Let nB=1 mole of benzene and let ns = moles of solute. Then
xB=nB+nsnB=1+ns1
Equate to the value from step 2:
1+ns1=268167
- Solve for ns Invert both sides:
1+ns=167268
ns=167268−1=167268−167=167101
Compute the decimal:
ns≈0.60479≈0.605
- Interpret the result This means that for every 1 mole of benzene, we need about 0.605 moles of non‑volatile solute to lower the vapour pressure from 268 torr to 167 torr at 50 °C.
TipNotice that we never needed the molar mass of benzene (78 g mol⁻¹) — it’s a distractor. The problem asks for a mole ratio, which comes directly from Raoult’s law.
Watch outA common mistake is to use the formula for relative lowering of vapour pressure:
p∘p∘−p=xsolute
That gives xsolute=(268−167)/268=101/268≈0.3769. But that is the mole fraction of solute, not the moles of solute per mole of benzene. To get the required ratio, you must convert:
nBns=1−xsolutexsolute=167/268101/268=167101≈0.605
So both approaches lead to the same answer — just be careful which quantity the question asks for.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-FN1 markMCQQ.The freezing point of heavy water at 1 atm pressure is (A) 0 ∘C (B) 3.8 ∘C (C) 4.8 ∘C (D) 1 ∘C
›Reveal solutionSolution
Heavy water (D2O) has a higher freezing point than normal water (H2O) because the heavier deuterium atoms lead to stronger hydrogen bonds, requiring more energy to break the crystal lattice. Its freezing point is approximately 3.8 ∘C.
Concept and Intuition
Water, as we commonly know it, is H2O, where H represents protium, the most common isotope of hydrogen with one proton and no neutrons. Heavy water, on the other hand, is D2O, where D represents deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen with one proton and one neutron. This makes deuterium approximately twice as heavy as protium.
This difference in mass, though seemingly small, significantly affects the physical properties of water. The heavier deuterium atoms lead to stronger intermolecular forces, specifically hydrogen bonds, in D2O compared to H2O. This is primarily because the vibrational energy of the O-D bond is lower than that of the O-H bond (due to the higher reduced mass), which translates to a lower zero-point energy. A lower zero-point energy means the bond is effectively stronger and requires more energy to break. Consequently, more thermal energy is needed to disrupt the ordered structure of ice and transition it into liquid water. This results in higher melting (freezing) and boiling points for heavy water.
Step-by-Step Solution
-
Recall the freezing point of normal water:
Normal water (H2O) freezes at 0 ∘C at 1 atm pressure. This is a fundamental reference point for understanding the properties of water.
-
Understand the nature of heavy water (D2O):
Heavy water contains deuterium (D) instead of protium (H). Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen with an atomic mass of approximately 2 amu, while protium has an atomic mass of approximately 1 amu. This difference in mass affects the physical properties of the molecule.
-
Identify the freezing point of heavy water:
Due to the stronger hydrogen bonding and lower zero-point energy associated with the heavier deuterium atoms, heavy water requires more energy to transition from solid to liquid phase. Therefore, its freezing point is higher than that of normal water. The experimentally determined freezing point of heavy water at 1 atm pressure is approximately 3.81 ∘C.
NoteThe stronger hydrogen bonds in D2O also lead to a higher boiling point (101.4 ∘C for D2O compared to 100 ∘C for H2O) and a higher density (1.1056 g/cm3 for D2O at 25 ∘C compared to 0.997 g/cm3 for H2O at 25 ∘C).
-
Compare with the given options:
- (A) 0 ∘C: This is the freezing point of normal water.
- (B) 3.8 ∘C: This value is very close to the actual freezing point of heavy water (3.81 ∘C).
- (C) 4.8 ∘C: This is too high.
- (D) 1 ∘C: This is too low.
Therefore, option (B) is the correct answer.
✓Final answerThe freezing point of heavy water at 1 atm pressure is approximately 3.8 ∘C.
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-20-AN1 markMCQQ.If 2 g of NaOH is dissolved to make 200 ml solution at 25 ∘C, the molarity (M) at 90 ∘C is (A) M<0.25 (B) 0.5>M>0.25 (C) M=0.25 (D) 0.5<M<1.0
›Reveal solutionSolution
Molarity depends on volume, which expands with temperature. Since the solution is prepared at 25 °C but measured at 90 °C, the volume increases, so molarity decreases. The final molarity is less than 0.25 M, making option (A) correct.
The key concept here is that molarity is defined as moles of solute per litre of solution. Moles of NaOH are fixed once dissolved, but the volume of the solution changes with temperature because liquids expand when heated. At 90 °C, the solution occupies a larger volume than at 25 °C, so the molarity drops.
Let’s work through it step by step.
-
Find the moles of NaOH.
Molar mass of NaOH = 23 + 16 + 1 = 40 g/mol.
Given mass = 2 g.
Moles of NaOH = 402=0.05 mol.
-
Calculate molarity at 25 °C.
Volume at 25 °C = 200 mL = 0.200 L.
Molarity at 25 °C = 0.2000.05=0.25 M.
-
What happens at 90 °C?
The number of moles of NaOH stays the same — no solute is added or removed. But the solution expands. Water (and dilute aqueous solutions) has a coefficient of volume expansion of roughly 2.1×10−4 °C⁻¹. Over a 65 °C rise (from 25 °C to 90 °C), the volume increases by about
ΔV=V0⋅γ⋅ΔT=200×2.1×10−4×65≈2.73 mL.
So the new volume ≈ 202.73 mL = 0.20273 L.
-
Molarity at 90 °C = 0.202730.05≈0.2466 M, which is less than 0.25 M.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that molarity uses solution volume, not solvent volume, and that volume changes with temperature. Some students assume molarity is temperature-independent — it is not, because volume is temperature-dependent.
TipYou don’t need the exact expansion coefficient for this multiple-choice question. Since volume always increases with temperature for liquids, molarity must decrease. At 25 °C it’s exactly 0.25 M, so at any higher temperature it will be strictly less than 0.25 M. That alone eliminates options (B), (C), and (D).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A), because the molarity at 90 °C is less than 0.25 M.
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-20-FN1 markMCQQ.The intramolecular hydrogen bonding is present in (A) phenol (B) Benzoic acid (C) para-Nitrophenol (D) 2-Hydroxybenzoic Acid
›Reveal solutionSolution
Intramolecular hydrogen bonding requires a hydrogen donor and an acceptor in close proximity within the same molecule, forming a stable five- or six-membered ring. Among the given options, only 2-Hydroxybenzoic acid (salicylic acid) can form such a bond, making (D) the correct answer.
The key concept here is the geometry of hydrogen bonding. For a hydrogen bond to form within a single molecule, the donor group (like –OH) and the acceptor atom (like a carbonyl oxygen) must be positioned so that a stable, usually five- or six-membered ring can close. This is only possible when the groups are on adjacent carbon atoms in a rigid structure like a benzene ring.
Let’s examine each option:
-
Phenol (A) – Phenol has an –OH group attached to a benzene ring. The only nearby acceptor atoms are the ring carbons, which are not electronegative enough to form a strong hydrogen bond. The oxygen of the –OH can act as an acceptor for another molecule, but within the same molecule, there is no suitable acceptor in the right position. So, no intramolecular H-bond.
-
Benzoic acid (B) – The –COOH group has both a donor (–OH) and an acceptor (C=O). However, these are part of the same functional group and are already bonded to each other. The carbonyl oxygen is too far from the –OH of another benzoic acid molecule to form an intramolecular bond; instead, benzoic acid forms intermolecular dimers (two molecules linked by two H-bonds). No intramolecular bond here.
-
para-Nitrophenol (C) – The –OH group is at the para position relative to the –NO₂ group. The distance between them is too large (four carbon atoms apart) to allow a stable ring. The nitro group’s oxygen is a good acceptor, but the geometry forces the H-bond to be intermolecular. So, no intramolecular bond.
-
2-Hydroxybenzoic acid (D) – Here, the –OH group is at the ortho position relative to the –COOH group. This places the –OH hydrogen very close to the carbonyl oxygen of the –COOH. A six-membered ring (including the hydrogen) can form, which is highly stable. This is the classic example of intramolecular hydrogen bonding, often seen in salicylic acid.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that any molecule with both a donor and an acceptor automatically forms an intramolecular H-bond. The distance and ring size are critical. If the groups are too far apart (like in para-nitrophenol), the bond will be intermolecular instead.
TipA quick way to check: look for an –OH group and a C=O or –NO₂ group on adjacent carbon atoms of a benzene ring. That almost always signals intramolecular H-bonding.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) 2-Hydroxybenzoic acid.
-
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-04-AN1 markMCQQ.The degree of dissociation of 0.1 M acid HA is 5%. The value of Kc of HA is (A) 1.3×10−4 (B) 2.6×10−3 (C) 2.6×10−4 (D) 1.3×10−2
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a weak acid, the equilibrium constant Kc is related to the degree of dissociation α and initial concentration C by Kc=Cα2. With C=0.1 M and α=0.05, we get Kc=2.5×10−4, which rounds to option (C) 2.6×10−4.
The key idea here is that a weak acid does not dissociate completely. The degree of dissociation, α, tells you what fraction of the original acid molecules have broken into ions at equilibrium. For a monoprotic acid like HA, the equilibrium constant Kc (also called the acid dissociation constant Ka) is directly linked to α and the initial concentration C through a simple relation — but only if we make the standard approximation that α is small.
Let’s walk through it.
- Set up the equilibrium. For the reaction
HA⇌H++A−
start with initial concentration C=0.1 M of HA, and zero of the ions. At equilibrium, a fraction α of HA has dissociated. So:
- [HA]=C(1−α)
- [H+]=Cα
- [A−]=Cα
- Write the expression for Kc.
Kc=[HA][H+][A−]=C(1−α)(Cα)(Cα)=1−αCα2
- Plug in the numbers. Here C=0.1 and α=5%=0.05.
Kc=1−0.050.1×(0.05)2=0.950.1×0.0025=0.950.00025
- Simplify.
0.950.00025=0.952.5×10−4≈2.6316×10−4
Rounded to two significant figures, this is 2.6×10−4.
Watch outA common mistake is to use the approximation Kc≈Cα2 without checking if 1−α≈1 is valid. Here α=0.05, so 1−α=0.95 — the approximation would give 2.5×10−4, which is close but not exact. The problem expects the exact calculation, which yields 2.6×10−4.
TipIf α is less than about 5%, the approximation 1−α≈1 is usually acceptable in exams. But when the answer choices are close (like 2.5 vs 2.6), always use the exact formula to be safe.
✓Final answerThe value of Kc is 2.6×10−4, which corresponds to option (C).
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-04-AN1 markMCQQ.The trend in the colligative properties for the same concentration of BaCl2, MgCl2 and NaCl, respectively, is (A) NaCl > MgCl2 > BaCl2 (B) NaCl > BaCl2 > MgCl2 (C) MgCl2 = BaCl2 < NaCl (D) MgCl2 = BaCl2 > NaCl
›Reveal solutionSolution
Colligative properties depend on the number of particles in solution. For the same concentration, BaCl₂ and MgCl₂ each give 3 ions, while NaCl gives 2 — so the trend is MgCl₂ = BaCl₂ > NaCl.
Colligative properties — like boiling point elevation, freezing point depression, and osmotic pressure — depend only on the number of solute particles in a given amount of solvent, not on the chemical identity of those particles. This is the core idea: more particles means a larger effect.
For ionic compounds dissolved in water, the number of particles per formula unit equals the number of ions produced upon dissociation. So the key is to count ions.
-
NaCl dissociates as:
NaCl→Na++Cl−
That gives 2 ions per formula unit.
-
MgCl₂ dissociates as:
MgCl2→Mg2++2Cl−
That gives 3 ions per formula unit.
-
BaCl₂ dissociates as:
BaCl2→Ba2++2Cl−
That also gives 3 ions per formula unit.
At the same molar concentration, the solution with more ions will show a greater colligative effect. So MgCl₂ and BaCl₂, both giving 3 ions, will have equal and larger effects than NaCl, which gives only 2 ions.
Watch outA common mistake is to think that MgCl₂ and BaCl₂ differ because Mg and Ba are different elements. But colligative properties ignore the type of ion — only the count matters. Both give exactly 3 ions, so their effects are identical at the same concentration.
Thus the correct order is:
MgCl2=BaCl2>NaCl
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) MgCl₂ = BaCl₂ > NaCl.
-
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.