Skip to content

Chemistry · Ch 4 — The d- and f-Block Elements

Physical Properties

4.3.1

Physical Properties

Metallic Character

Almost every transition element behaves as a classic metal: good tensile strength, ductility, malleability, high thermal and electrical conductivity, and a metallic lustre. Most of them also crystallise in one or more of the standard close-packed metallic lattices (body-centred cubic, hexagonal close-packed, or cubic close-packed) at ordinary temperatures — the lattice-structure data for the full 3dd/4dd/5dd set is collected in the accompanying table. The exceptions are Zn, Cd, Hg and Mn, which adopt structures that are not among the three typical metallic arrangements.

Table gfc-1Lattice structures of the transition metals — the crystal structure(s) each 3d, 4d and 5d series metal adopts at normal temperatures, as tabulated in the NCERT Class 12 chemistry d-block chapter (bcc = body centred cubic; hcp = hexagonal close packed; ccp = cubic close packed; X = a typical metal structure).

Lattice Structures of Transition Metals

ScTiVCrMnFeCoNiCuZn
hcp (bcc)hcp (bcc)bccbccX (bcc, ccp)bcc (hcp)ccp (hcp)ccpccpX (hcp)
YZrNbMoTcRuRhPdAgCd
hcp (bcc)hcp (bcc)bccbcchcphcpccpccpccpX (hcp)
LaHfTaWReOsIrPtAuHg
hcp (ccp,bcc)hcp (bcc)bccbcchcphcpccpccpccpX

High Melting and Boiling Points

With the exception of Zn, Cd and Hg, transition metals are hard and have very low volatility, which shows up as unusually high melting and boiling points. The reason lies in the bonding: in a normal metal, only the outermost nsns electrons participate in metallic bonding, but in a transition metal the (n−1)d(n-1)d electrons join in as well. Because a greater number of electrons — both (n−1)d(n-1)d and nsns — take part in holding the lattice together, the interatomic metallic bonding is markedly stronger, and correspondingly more energy is needed to break the lattice apart.

Figure 4.1Trends in melting points of transition elements
Fig. 4.1 — Trends in melting points of transition elements

Drawn by us to help you understand the concept clearly, and verified to make sure it's accurate. For exams, practice from your textbook's own diagram.

What the Graph Shows

The figure plots melting point (in units of 10310^3 K) on the vertical axis against atomic number on the horizontal axis. Three separate curves are drawn, one for each transition series:

  • 3d series: Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn
  • 4d series: Y Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd
  • 5d series: La Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg

Each point on a curve is labelled with the element symbol. The curves are not continuous lines but connect the points for each series, showing how melting point changes as you move across the period.

What the Pattern Teaches

All three curves share a common shape: they rise to a maximum near the middle of the series (at Cr, Mo, and W respectively — the d5d^5 configuration region) and then fall towards the end. A notable dip occurs at Mn (3d series) and Tc (4d series); the 5d series shows a similar but less pronounced dip at Re.

The 5d series lies highest overall, the 4d series is intermediate, and the 3d series is lowest. This ordering reflects the increasing strength of metallic bonding as you go down a group: more diffuse dd orbitals in heavier elements allow greater overlap and stronger bonding.

The Physical Idea

Melting point in transition metals is determined by the strength of metallic bonding, which depends on the number of unpaired dd electrons available for bonding. In the middle of a series (around d5d^5), the maximum number of unpaired electrons gives the strongest bonding and highest melting point. At the ends (early d1d^1–d2d^2 or late d8d^8–d10d^{10}), fewer unpaired electrons weaken the bond, lowering the melting point. The dip at Mn/Tc arises because the half-filled d5d^5 subshell is stable and less willing to share electrons, temporarily reducing bond strength.

Key Formula Developed

The textbook uses this figure to introduce the concept of enthalpy of atomisation (ΔaH⊖\Delta_a H^\ominus), which is the energy required to convert one mole of a solid metal into isolated gaseous atoms. For transition metals, ΔaH⊖\Delta_a H^\ominus is directly related to the melting point trend:

ΔaH⊖∝(strength of metallic bonding)\Delta_a H^\ominus \propto \text{(strength of metallic bonding)} …

Within any one row (3dd, 4dd or 5dd), melting point rises to a maximum around the d5d^5 configuration and then falls off fairly steadily as the atomic number increases further — Mn and Tc are the anomalies that break this pattern. This maximum at (or near) d5d^5 is consistent with the idea that having one unpaired electron in each of the five dd orbitals is especially favourable for strong interatomic interaction: the more valence electrons available for bonding, the stronger the resulting bond.

Enthalpy of Atomisation

The same underlying trend is reflected in the enthalpy of atomisation, which also peaks near the middle of each series before declining. Two further generalisations emerge on comparing the three series:

  • Because enthalpy of atomisation is a major factor governing a metal's standard electrode potential, metals with a very high enthalpy of atomisation (equivalently, a very high boiling point) tend to be relatively unreactive — "noble" — in their chemical behaviour.
  • The 4dd and 5dd series metals have distinctly greater enthalpies of atomisation than the corresponding 3dd metals. This greater strength of metal–metal bonding in the heavier series is an important reason why metal–metal bonded compounds occur much more frequently among the heavier transition metals.
Figure 4.2Trends in enthalpies of atomisation of transition elements
Fig. 4.2 — Trends in enthalpies of atomisation of transition elements

Drawn by us to help you understand the concept clearly, and verified to make sure it's accurate. For exams, practice from your textbook's own diagram.

The figure is a line graph plotting enthalpy of atomisation (ΔaH∘\Delta_a H^\circ, in kJ mol−1\text{kJ mol}^{-1}) on the vertical axis against atomic number (Z) on the horizontal axis. Three separate curves are drawn, one for each transition series:

  • 3d series (Sc to Zn, atomic numbers 21–30)
  • 4d series (Y to Cd, atomic numbers 39–48)
  • 5d series (La to Hg, atomic numbers 57–80, excluding the lanthanides)

Each curve has nine data points (one per element) connected by a line. The y‑axis runs from 0 to 900 in steps of 100. All three curves show a common pattern: they rise from the left, reach a maximum near the middle of the series, and then fall toward the right end. The 5d series lies highest throughout, the 4d series is intermediate, and the 3d series is lowest.

What the figure teaches

The enthalpy of atomisation is the energy required to convert one mole of a solid metal into isolated gaseous atoms. For transition metals, this energy is directly related to the strength of metallic bonding in the solid. The key idea is:

More unpaired d‑electrons → stronger metallic bonding → higher enthalpy of atomisation.

In the middle of each series (e.g., Cr, Mo, W), the number of unpaired d‑electrons is largest, so the metallic bond is strongest and ΔaH∘\Delta_a H^\circ peaks. At the ends (e.g., Zn, Cd, Hg), the d‑subshell is fully filled (no unpaired electrons), metallic bonding is weak, and ΔaH∘\Delta_a H^\circ is low.

The higher values for 4d and 5d series compared to 3d arise because the 4d and 5d orbitals are more diffuse and extend further from the nucleus, allowing greater overlap between neighbouring atoms and thus stronger bonding.

Key formula developed from this figure

The textbook uses the figure to illustrate the relationship between enthalpy of atomisation and metallic bond strength, but no single formula is derived from the graph itself. Instead, the figure supports the general expression for the enthalpy change of atomisation:

ΔaH∘=∑(bond dissociation energies)−lattice energy terms\Delta_a H^\circ = \sum (\text{bond dissociation energies}) - \text{lattice energy terms} …

…