Q.Two moving coil meters, M1 and M2 have the following particulars:
R1=10 Ω, N1=30, A1=3.6×10−3 m2, B1=0.25 T
R2=14 Ω, N2=42, A2=1.8×10−3 m2, B2=0.50 T
(The spring constants are identical for the two meters). Determine the ratio of
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Ammeter Loading Effect
Ammeter Loading Effect – First Principles
Imagine you want to measure the current flowing through a bulb in a simple circuit. You take an ammeter, break the wire, and insert the meter in series. The reading you get — is it the original current that was flowing before you touched the circuit? Not exactly. The moment you insert the ammeter, you have added a small extra resistance into the path. That extra resistance changes the total resistance of the circuit, and therefore changes the current itself.
This is the core intuition: the act of measuring changes the thing being measured.
The Precise Statement
Ammeter loading effect is the error introduced in a current measurement because the ammeter has a non-zero internal resistance Rm. When placed in series with the circuit, Rm adds to the total circuit resistance, reducing the actual current from its original value. The measured current is therefore less than the true current that would flow if the ammeter were ideal (zero resistance).
Why It Happens – Step by Step
Consider a simple circuit: a battery of voltage V and a load resistor RL. The true current (without any meter) is:
Itrue=RLV
Now you insert an ammeter with internal resistance Rm in series. The total resistance becomes RL+Rm, so the measured current is:
Imeasured=RL+RmV
Since Rm>0, we always have Imeasured<Itrue.
The percentage error due to loading is:
Error=ItrueItrue−Imeasured×100%=RL+RmRm×100%
The error is not fixed — it depends on the ratio Rm/RL. If RL is very large compared to Rm, the error is tiny. If RL is comparable to or smaller than Rm, the error becomes significant. This is why ammeter loading is most problematic in low-resistance circuits.
When Does It Matter Most?
- Low-resistance circuits (e.g., measuring current in a power supply line): RL is small, so even a small Rm (say 0.1 Ω) can cause noticeable error.
- High-precision measurements: In labs or instrumentation, even 1% error may be unacceptable.
- Digital multimeters (DMMs) typically have very low Rm (milliohms) on current ranges, so loading is minimal for most practical circuits. But analog moving-coil meters can have higher Rm, especially on low current ranges.
How to Minimise Loading
- Use an ammeter with the lowest possible internal resistance — ideally zero, but practically as small as possible.
- Choose a higher current range on a multimeter: higher ranges often have lower shunt resistance, hence lower Rm.
- If you know Rm, correct the reading using the formula above — but this requires knowing RL accurately.
- Use an indirect method: measure voltage across a known precision shunt resistor and calculate current via Ohm’s law (this is what ammeters do internally anyway, but with a very low shunt). …
Why this formula?
Ammeter Loading Effect — Why the Formula Holds
The ammeter loading effect occurs because an ideal ammeter has zero resistance, but a real ammeter has non-zero internal resistance (RA). When you insert it into a circuit to measure current, it changes the circuit's total resistance — and therefore the actual current flowing.
Let's understand why the key formula emerges.
1. The Core Idea
Consider a simple circuit: a voltage source V in series with a load resistor RL.
-
Without ammeter:
Current Itrue=RLV
-
With ammeter (internal resistance RA) inserted in series:
Total resistance becomes RL+RA
Measured current Imeasured=RL+RAV
Since RA>0, we get Imeasured<Itrue.
This reduction is the loading effect.
2. Key Formula — Percentage Error
The percentage error due to loading is:
% error=ItrueItrue−Imeasured×100
Substitute the expressions:
% error=RLVRLV−RL+RAV×100
Simplify step-by-step:
- Factor out V:
=RLVV(RL1−RL+RA1)×100
- Cancel V:
=RL1RL1−RL+RA1×100
- Multiply numerator and denominator by RL:
=(1−RL+RARL)×100
- Combine into single fraction:
=RL+RARL+RA−RL×100
- Final result:
% error=RL+RARA×100
3. Why This Formula Makes Sense
-
If RA≪RL (ammeter resistance negligible):
% error≈0 — no loading.
-
If RA≈RL:
Error is about 50% — serious loading.
-
If RA≫RL:
Error approaches 100% — ammeter almost blocks the current. …
Concept: Ammeter Loading Effect — but here we directly compare sensitivities using construction parameters.
Reasoning:
-
Current sensitivity of a moving coil meter is SI=kNBA, where k is the spring constant (same for both). So the ratio depends only on NBA.
For M1: N1B1A1=30×0.25×3.6×10−3=27×10−3
For M2: N2B2A2=42×0.50×1.8×10−3=37.8×10−3
Ratio SI1SI2=2737.8=1.4 …
Current sensitivity depends on NBA/k, voltage sensitivity on NBA/(kR). Since spring constants are identical, the ratios reduce to N1B1A1N2B2A2 for current sensitivity and N1B1A1/R1N2B2A2/R2 for voltage sensitivity. The answers are (a) 1.4 and (b) 1.0.
A moving coil meter works by passing current through a coil in a magnetic field. The torque produced is τ=NBIA, where N is the number of turns, B the magnetic field, I the current, and A the area of the coil. This torque is opposed by the spring, which gives a restoring torque τs=kθ, with k the spring constant (same for both meters here). At equilibrium, NBIA=kθ, so the deflection θ is proportional to I.
Current sensitivity is defined as deflection per unit current: SI=θ/I=NBA/k. Since k is identical for M1 and M2, the ratio of current sensitivities is simply the ratio of NBA products.
Voltage sensitivity is deflection per unit voltage. If the meter has resistance R, then I=V/R, so θ=(NBA/k)⋅(V/R). Hence SV=θ/V=NBA/(kR). Again, k cancels in the ratio.
Let’s compute step by step.
-
Current sensitivity ratio
For M1: N1B1A1=30×0.25×(3.6×10−3)
=30×0.25=7.5, then 7.5×3.6×10−3=27×10−3=0.027
For M2: N2B2A2=42×0.50×(1.8×10−3)
=42×0.50=21, then 21×1.8×10−3=37.8×10−3=0.0378
Ratio SI1SI2=0.0270.0378=1.4
-
Voltage sensitivity ratio
For M1: R1N1B1A1=100.027=0.0027 …
Method: Direct Formula Substitution Method
This method uses the standard formulas for current sensitivity and voltage sensitivity of a moving coil galvanometer, then directly substitutes the given data.
Step 1: Recall the formulas
-
Current sensitivity (SI) = kNBA
(deflection per unit current)
-
Voltage sensitivity (SV) = kRNBA
(deflection per unit voltage)
Here, k is the spring constant (same for both meters).
Step 2: Write the ratio for current sensitivity
We need SI1SI2
SI1SI2=N1B1A1/kN2B2A2/k=N1B1A1N2B2A2
Substitute values:
=30×0.25×(3.6×10−3)42×0.50×(1.8×10−3)
Simplify step-by-step:
- Numerator: 42×0.50=21, then 21×1.8×10−3=37.8×10−3
- Denominator: 30×0.25=7.5, then 7.5×3.6×10−3=27×10−3
SI1SI2=27×10−337.8×10−3=2737.8=1.4
Answer (a): 1.4
Step 3: Write the ratio for voltage sensitivity …
Common Mistakes: Ammeter Loading Effect & Sensitivity Problems
Students often confuse current sensitivity and voltage sensitivity — and then make avoidable errors in ratio problems. Here are the most frequent mistakes and how to avoid each.
✗ Mistake 1: Confusing the formulas for current sensitivity and voltage sensitivity
What students do wrong:
They swap the formulas or use the same formula for both.
Correct understanding:
- Current sensitivity (SI) = deflection per unit current
SI=kNBA
where k is the spring constant (same for both meters here).
- Voltage sensitivity (SV) = deflection per unit voltage
SV=RSI=kRNBA
How to avoid:
Write both formulas side-by-side before starting. Remember: voltage sensitivity = current sensitivity divided by resistance.
✗ Mistake 2: Forgetting that spring constants are identical
What students do wrong:
They try to find k numerically or cancel it incorrectly.
Correct approach:
Since k is the same for M1 and M2, it cancels out in the ratio. You only need N, B, A, and R.
How to avoid:
Always check which quantities are common between the meters before writing ratios.
✗ Mistake 3: Incorrect ratio direction
What students do wrong:
They compute SM2SM1 instead of SM1SM2.
Correct approach:
The question asks: ratio of M2 and M1 → SM1SM2.
How to avoid:
Read carefully: “ratio of A and B” means BA.
✗ Mistake 4: Arithmetic errors in multiplication/division
What students do wrong:
They mess up the product N×B×A or forget to square units.
Correct calculation for part (a):
SI1SI2=N1B1A1N2B2A2
Substitute:
=30×0.25×3.6×10−342×0.50×1.8×10−3
Simplify step-by-step:
- Numerator: 42×0.50=21, then 21×1.8=37.8, then ×10−3
- Denominator: 30×0.25=7.5, then 7.5×3.6=27, then ×10−3
=2737.8=1.4
How to avoid:
Do one multiplication at a time. Cancel 10−3 early.
✗ Mistake 5: Forgetting to include resistance in voltage sensitivity ratio …
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.Two spherical black bodies A and B of equal radii are at absolute temperatures 2T and 3T respectively. If the absolute temperature of the surroundings is T, then the ratio of the radiant powers emitted by the bodies A and B is (A) 3:16 (B) 3:8 (C) 1:2 (D) 2:3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The net radiant power of a body is the difference between its emitted power and the absorbed power from the surroundings. Using the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the ratio for A and B is 3:16, so option (A) is correct.
The key here is that "radiant power" in the presence of surroundings means net power — what the body actually radiates away after accounting for the radiation it absorbs from the environment. A black body both emits and absorbs perfectly, so its net power is σA(T4−T04), where T0 is the surrounding temperature. Many students mistakenly use just T4, forgetting the absorption term, and get a wrong ratio.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Write the formula for net radiant power. For a black body of surface area A at absolute temperature T, surrounded by a medium at temperature T0, the net power radiated is
P=σA(T4−T04)
where σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. This is because the body emits σAT4 and absorbs σAT04 from the surroundings.
- Apply to body A. Body A has temperature TA=2T and surroundings at T0=T. Its net power is
PA=σA[(2T)4−T4]=σA(16T4−T4)=σA(15T4).
- Apply to body B. Body B has temperature TB=3T and the same surroundings T0=T. Its net power is
PB=σA[(3T)4−T4]=σA(81T4−T4)=σA(80T4).
- Find the ratio. The ratio PA:PB is PBPA=80T415T4=8015=163. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.The magnetic field at a point A on the axis of a short bar magnet is 1500% more than the magnetic field at a point B on the normal bisector of the magnet. If the distance of point A from the centre of the magnet is 18 cm, then the distance of point B from the centre of the magnet is (A) 72 cm (B) 36 cm (C) 48 cm (D) 54 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The axial field of a short bar magnet is twice the equatorial field at the same distance. The problem states the axial field is 1500% more (i.e., 16 times) the equatorial field, so the distances must adjust by the cube root of 16. The answer is 36 cm.
The key concept here is the variation of the magnetic field of a short bar magnet along its axis and on its equatorial line. For a short magnet (length negligible compared to distance), the field at a point on the axis at distance r is Baxis=4πμ0⋅r32M, and on the equatorial line at the same distance r it is Beq=4πμ0⋅r3M. Notice the axial field is exactly twice the equatorial field at the same distance.
But here the distances are different. The problem says the axial field at point A is 1500% more than the equatorial field at point B. "1500% more" means the axial field is the equatorial field plus 1500% of it — that is, BA=BB+15BB=16BB. So BA=16BB.
Now we write the expressions and solve for the unknown distance.
- Let dA=18 cm be the distance of point A from the centre along the axis. Let dB be the distance of point B from the centre on the normal bisector (equatorial line). For a short bar magnet:
BA=4πμ0⋅dA32M,BB=4πμ0⋅dB3M.
- The given condition is BA=16BB. Substitute:
4πμ0⋅dA32M=16⋅4πμ0⋅dB3M.
- Cancel the common factor 4πμ0M (non-zero):
dA32=dB316.
- Rearrange: dA3dB3=216=8. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-09-FN1 markMCQQ.When two resistances P and Q are connected in the left and right gaps of a meter bridge respectively, then the balancing point is obtained at a distance greater than 25 cm. If the resistance P is increased by 5 Ω, the balancing point shifts by 10 cm. After that if the resistance Q is halved, the balancing point further shifts by 15 cm, then the initial value of P is (A) 5 Ω (B) 15 Ω (C) 10 Ω (D) 20 Ω
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to use the meter bridge balance condition P/Q=l/(100−l) and track how the balancing length changes with each modification. Solving the system of equations yields the initial value P=10Ω.
The meter bridge works on the principle of a Wheatstone bridge. When the bridge is balanced, the ratio of the two resistances in the left and right gaps equals the ratio of the lengths of the wire on either side of the balance point. If the balance point is at l cm from the left end, then:
QP=100−ll
We are told the initial balance point is greater than 25 cm. Then we apply two successive changes, each shifting the balance point by a known amount. The trick is to carefully track the direction of each shift — whether the balance point moves left or right — because that tells us the sign of the change in length.
- Set up the initial condition. Let the initial balance point be at l cm (with l>25). Then:
QP=100−ll(1)
- First change: increase P by 5Ω. New left gap resistance = P+5. The balance point shifts by 10 cm. Since increasing P makes the left side stronger, the balance point must move to the right (longer left arm to compensate). So the new balance length is l+10.
QP+5=90−ll+10(2)
- Second change: then halve Q. Now left gap = P+5, right gap = Q/2. The balance point shifts further by 15 cm. But careful: halving Q makes the right side weaker, so the balance point again moves to the right. So from the previous position, it moves another 15 cm to the right. The new balance length = (l+10)+15=l+25.
Q/2P+5=75−ll+25(3)
- Simplify equation (3). Multiply numerator and denominator:
Q2(P+5)=75−ll+25
So:
QP+5=2(75−l)l+25(3’)
- Equate expressions for (P+5)/Q from (2) and (3'). From (2): QP+5=90−ll+10 From (3'): QP+5=2(75−l)l+25 Set them equal:
90−ll+10=2(75−l)l+25
Cross-multiply:
2(l+10)(75−l)=(l+25)(90−l)
- Solve for l. Expand left: 2[(l)(75−l)+10(75−l)]=2[75l−l2+750−10l]=2[−l2+65l+750]=−2l2+130l+1500 Expand right: (l)(90−l)+25(90−l)=90l−l2+2250−25l=−l2+65l+2250 So equation: −2l2+130l+1500=−l2+65l+2250 …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.When a load is attached at the midpoint of a steel bar A of length 80 cm, breadth 2.5 cm and thickness 2 mm, it sags by 1.2 mm. If the same load is attached at the midpoint of another steel bar B of length 120 cm, breadth 3 cm and thickness 3 mm, the bar B sags by (In both the cases, the bars are supported at the two ends) (A) 0.18 cm (B) 0.10 cm (C) 0.12 cm (D) 0.15 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
For a centrally loaded beam supported at both ends, δ∝bd3L3 for the same load and material; this gives δB=1.0 mm=0.10 cm — option (B).
Depression formula. With central load W, Young's modulus Y, length L, breadth b, thickness d:
δ=4Ybd3WL3 ⇒ δ∝bd3L3(same W, Y).
Ratio.
δAδB=(LALB)3⋅bBbA⋅(dBdA)3.
Data: LA=80, LB=120 cm; bA=2.5, bB=3 cm; dA=2, dB=3 mm. …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.When a 15 Ω resistor is connected in parallel to a galvanometer, its deflection becomes one-fourth. Then the resistance of the galvanometer is (A) 45 Ω (B) 60 Ω (C) 15 Ω (D) 30 Ω
›Reveal solutionSolution
A shunt resistor in parallel diverts most of the current away from the galvanometer. When the deflection drops to one-fourth, the current through the galvanometer is one-fourth of the total current, so the shunt carries three-fourths. Using the parallel current-divider rule gives the galvanometer resistance as 45 Ω.
The key idea here is that a galvanometer’s deflection is proportional to the current passing through it. When you connect a resistor in parallel (called a shunt), some of the total current bypasses the galvanometer, reducing its deflection. The problem tells you the deflection becomes one-fourth of its original value — that means the current through the galvanometer is now one-fourth of the total current entering the parallel combination.
Let’s work through it step by step.
-
Understand what “deflection becomes one-fourth” means.
The original deflection corresponds to the full current Ig (when no shunt is connected). After adding the shunt, the new deflection is one-fourth, so the current through the galvanometer is now Ig′=4I, where I is the total current entering the parallel circuit. The remaining current 43I flows through the shunt resistor Rs=15 Ω.
-
Apply the parallel current-divider rule.
In a parallel circuit, the current divides inversely with resistance. For two resistors in parallel, the current through one branch is:
Ibranch=Itotal×sum of resistancesother resistance
Here, the galvanometer (resistance G) and the shunt (15 Ω) are in parallel. The current through the galvanometer is:
Ig′=I×G+1515
But we already know Ig′=4I. So:
4I=I×G+1515
- Cancel I (assuming I=0) and solve for G.
41=G+1515
Cross-multiply:
G+15=60
G=45 Ω …
-
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-AN1 markMCQQ.Two identical circular coils each of radius R and number of turns N are arranged coaxially with a separation of R between their centers. If the current through each coil is I, then the maximum resultant magnetic field induced at the midpoint of the line joining the centers of the two coils is (A) R2μ0NI (B) 5R4μ0NI (C) 55R8μ0NI (D) πRμ0NI
›Reveal solutionSolution
The maximum resultant field at the midpoint occurs when the currents are in the same direction, and the field from each coil is found using the Biot–Savart law for a circular loop. Adding the two equal axial fields gives 55R8μ0NI, which corresponds to option (C).
The key idea is that two coaxial coils produce magnetic fields along their common axis. At the midpoint, the fields from each coil are parallel (if currents are in the same sense), so they simply add. The field on the axis of a single circular coil is a standard result, and we apply it at a distance R/2 from each coil’s center (since the separation is R and the midpoint is halfway).
Why this approach works:
The Biot–Savart law for a circular loop gives the axial field at a point a distance x from the center. The formula is symmetric and depends only on x, R, and the current. Since the two coils are identical and symmetrically placed, the fields at the midpoint are equal in magnitude. The maximum resultant occurs when they reinforce each other — i.e., currents in the same direction.
- Recall the axial field of a single circular coil For a coil of radius R, N turns, and current I, the magnetic field at a point on its axis at distance x from the center is
Bsingle=2(R2+x2)3/2μ0NIR2.
This comes from integrating the Biot–Savart law; the perpendicular components cancel, leaving only the axial component.
- Find the distance from each coil to the midpoint The coils are separated by R (center-to-center). The midpoint is therefore at a distance
x=2R
from each coil’s center.
- Compute the field from one coil at the midpoint Substitute x=R/2 into the formula:
B1=2(R2+(2R)2)3/2μ0NIR2=2(R2+4R2)3/2μ0NIR2=2(45R2)3/2μ0NIR2.
Simplify the denominator:
(45R2)3/2=(45)3/2R3=43/253/2R3=855R3,
since 43/2=(4)3=23=8.
Thus
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.Two metal wires A and B of lengths 80 cm and 120 cm respectively having equal cross-sectional area are connected to form a long wire. When the combination is subjected to a tension, the elongations of the wires A and B are 0.8 mm and 1.5 mm respectively. If the Young’s modulus of the material of the wire A is 1.6×1011 Nm−2, then the Young’s modulus of the material of the wire B (in 1011 Nm−2) is (A) 1.28 (B) 1.44 (C) 1.76 (D) 1.92
›Reveal solutionSolution
Wires A and B are joined end-to-end, so they carry the same tension and (equal area) the same stress; YB=YA⋅LAΔLA⋅ΔLBLB=1.28×1011 N m−2.
Because A and B are connected in series and pulled by one tension F with equal cross-sectional area A, the stress σ=F/A is identical in both wires.
Y=strainσ=ΔLσL⇒σ=LAYAΔLA=LBYBΔLB
Equating the common stress and solving for YB:
YB=YA⋅LAΔLA⋅ΔLBLB …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-05-FN1 markMCQQ.If the magnification of a compound microscope when the final image forms at near point is 14% greater than its magnification when the final image forms at infinity, then the ratio of the focal length of the eyepiece and least distance of distinct vision is (A) 3:25 (B) 3:50 (C) 7:50 (D) 7:25
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to use the standard magnification formulas for a compound microscope for the two cases (image at near point vs. at infinity) and set up the given percentage relation. The required ratio is 3:50.
Concept and Intuition
In a compound microscope, the total magnification is the product of the magnification produced by the objective lens and the magnification produced by the eyepiece. The objective's magnification is the same in both cases because the object is placed such that its image is formed at the same position relative to the objective (just inside the focal point of the eyepiece). The difference arises only in how the eyepiece is used.
When the final image is at infinity, the eyepiece is adjusted so that the intermediate image lies exactly at its focal point. The angular magnification of the eyepiece in this case is D/fe, where D is the least distance of distinct vision (usually 25 cm).
When the final image is at the near point (the closest distance for clear vision, D), the eyepiece is adjusted so that the intermediate image lies just inside its focal point, producing a virtual image at D. The angular magnification of the eyepiece in this case is 1+D/fe.
The problem tells us that the near-point magnification is 14% greater than the infinity magnification. This gives a direct equation relating fe and D.
Step-by-Step Solution
-
Define the variables.
Let fe be the focal length of the eyepiece and D be the least distance of distinct vision. The objective magnification mo is the same in both cases, so we only need to compare the eyepiece contributions.
-
Write the eyepiece magnification for the two cases.
- When the final image is at infinity: Me,∞=feD
- When the final image is at the near point: Me,np=1+feD
-
Express the total magnifications.
Let mo be the objective magnification. Then:
- Total magnification at infinity: M∞=mo⋅feD
- Total magnification at near point: Mnp=mo⋅(1+feD)
-
Use the given percentage relation.
The problem states that Mnp is 14% greater than M∞. That means:
Mnp=M∞+0.14M∞=1.14M∞ …
-
- TG EAPCET 2026Set ap-2026-05-05-FN1 markMCQQ.A coil of area 3×10−4 m2 and 80 turns of a moving coil galvanometer is suspended in a uniform radial magnetic field of 20 mT. If the resistance of the galvanometer is 50 Ω and its voltage sensitivity is 200 rad V−1, then the torsional constant of the spring of the galvanometer (in 10−8 Nm rad−1) is (A) 3.6 (B) 4.8 (C) 2.4 (D) 1.2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Voltage sensitivity =kRNBA, so k=VsRNBA=4.8×10−8 Nmrad−1.
For a moving-coil galvanometer the current sensitivity is Iθ=kNBA, and the voltage sensitivity is
Vs=Vθ=IRθ=kRNBA.
Rearranging for the torsional constant:
k=VsRNBA.
Substituting N=80, B=20 mT=0.02 T, A=3×10−4 m2, Vs=200 radV−1, R=50 Ω:
NBA=80×0.02×3×10−4=4.8×10−4, …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-FN1 markMCQQ.The drift speed of electrons in a material is found to be 0.3ms−1 when an electric field of 2Vm−1 is applied across it. The electron mobility (in m2V−1s−1) in the material is (A) 60×10−2 (B) 15×10−2 (C) 1350×106 (D) 5400×106
›Reveal solutionSolution
Electron mobility is the ratio of drift speed to electric field: μ=vd/E.
With vd=0.3 m/s and E=2 V/m, we get μ=0.15 m2V−1s−1=15×10−2 m2V−1s−1, so the correct option is (B).
Concept & Intuition
Mobility measures how quickly charge carriers (here electrons) can move through a material in response to an applied electric field. It’s defined as the drift speed per unit electric field:
μ=Evd
The units naturally come out as (m/s)/(V/m)=m2V−1s−1. The problem gives both vd and E directly, so it’s a straightforward division — no hidden physics, just careful handling of the numbers and units.
Step-by-step solution
- Write down the definition Electron mobility μ is given by
μ=Evd
where vd is the drift speed and E is the electric field strength.
- Insert the given values vd=0.3 m/s, E=2 V/m.
μ=20.3=0.15 m2V−1s−1
- Express in the form used by the options The options are given in terms of 10−2 or 106. 0.15=15×10−2, so
μ=15×10−2 m2V−1s−1
- Match with the choices …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.Two wires A and B made of same material and areas of cross-section in the ratio 1:2 are stretched by same force. If the masses of the wires A and B are in the ratio 2:3, then the ratio of the elongations of the wires A and B is (A) 1:2 (B) 8:3 (C) 1:3 (D) 4:3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to relate elongation to length, area, and force via Young’s modulus, then use the given mass and area ratios to find the length ratio, and finally compute the elongation ratio. The result is 8:3.
Concept & Intuition
When the same force stretches two wires of the same material, the elongation depends on the wire’s length and cross-sectional area. But we aren’t given lengths directly — we’re given masses and areas. Since mass = density × volume = density × (area × length), and density is the same for both wires, the mass ratio tells us the (area × length) ratio. From that, we can extract the length ratio, and then use the elongation formula.
Step-by-step solution
- Write the elongation formula For a wire of length L, area A, Young’s modulus Y, under force F:
ΔL=AYFL
Since F and Y are the same for both wires,
ΔLBΔLA=LB/ABLA/AA=LBLA⋅AAAB
- Use the given area ratio AA:AB=1:2 means AAAB=2. So
ΔLBΔLA=LBLA×2
- Find the length ratio from the mass ratio Mass m=density×volume=ρ×(AL). Given mA:mB=2:3 and ρ same for both:
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-03-AN1 markMCQQ.An alpha particle and a proton are accelerated from rest in a uniform electric field. The ratio of the times taken by proton and alpha particle to attain equal displacements is (A) 2:1 (B) 1:2 (C) 1:2 (D) 2:1
›Reveal solutionSolution
For particles starting from rest in a uniform electric field, the time to cover a given displacement scales as the square root of mass divided by charge. The proton-to-alpha time ratio is 1:2, so the correct option is (C).
Concept and Intuition
When a charged particle is placed in a uniform electric field, it experiences a constant force F=qE. Since the field is uniform, the force is constant, so the acceleration is constant. That means the motion is uniformly accelerated from rest. For such motion, the displacement after time t is s=21at2.
The key insight: the acceleration depends on both the charge q (which determines the force) and the mass m (which resists acceleration). So different particles will have different accelerations, and thus different times to cover the same distance. We need to compare the proton and the alpha particle.
TipAn alpha particle is a helium nucleus: it has charge +2e and mass 4mp (where mp is the proton mass). The proton has charge +e and mass mp.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Write the equation of motion For a particle of mass m and charge q in a uniform electric field E, the force is F=qE. By Newton’s second law, acceleration is:
a=mF=mqE.
Since the particle starts from rest, the displacement after time t is:
s=21at2=21(mqE)t2.
- Solve for time in terms of displacement Rearranging for t:
t=qE2sm.
For a fixed displacement s and fixed field E, the time depends on the ratio m/q:
t∝qm.
- Apply to the proton For the proton: mp, qp=e. So: …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.