Using the standard electrode potential, find out the pair between which redox reaction is not feasible. E⊖ val

NCERT Exemplar · Q4

Q. Using the standard electrode potential, find out the pair between which redox reaction is not feasible. E⊖ values: Fe^3+/Fe^2+ = +0.77; I2/I^- = +0.54; Cu^2+/Cu = +0.34; Ag^+/Ag = +0.80 V

(i) Fe^3+ and I^-

(ii) Ag^+ and Cu

(iii) Fe^3+ and Cu

(iv) Ag and Fe^3+

Tripura TbseMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★

56% · 44/78 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Standard Electrode Potentials

Standard Electrode Potentials: A Number for "How Badly It Wants Electrons"

Dip a zinc rod into a zinc-salt solution and a tiny tug-of-war begins at the surface:

metal atoms tend to dissolve as ions (leaving electrons behind on the rod) while ions

from the solution tend to deposit as metal (consuming electrons). The rod ends up with

a characteristic electrical potential relative to the solution — the electrode potential. It is a direct measure of the tendency of that redox couple to gain or

lose electrons.

The Core Idea

Different couples pull electrons with very different strengths. Copper's ion grabs

them readily; zinc's barely wants them. Put a number on each couple and you can

predict, before mixing anything, who will oxidise whom.

Two conventions make the numbers comparable:

Standard conditions. Every species at unit concentration (1 M), any gas at 1 atm, temperature 298 K. The potential measured then is the standard electrode potential, written $E^\ominus$ .
A common zero. Potentials can only be measured as differences, so one electrode is defined as the reference: the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), $2\text{H}^+ + 2e^- \rightarrow \text{H}_2$ , is fixed at exactly 0.00 V. Every $E^\ominus$ is the voltage of a couple measured against it.

By convention the values are tabulated for the reduction direction:

\text{Oxidised form} + ne^- \rightarrow \text{Reduced form} \qquad E^\ominus \text{ (in volts, at 298 K)}

Reading the Table

The standard-potential table (Table 7.1 in the Class 11 chapter) runs from

$\text{F}_2/\text{F}^-$ at $+2.87$ V down to $\text{Li}^+/\text{Li}$ at $-3.05$ V.

Two rules unlock it:

More positive $E^\ominus$ → stronger oxidising agent (the oxidised form is hungrier for electrons). F₂ tops the table; that is why fluorine oxidises almost everything.
More negative $E^\ominus$ → stronger reducing agent (the reduced form gives electrons up most easily). Li, K, Ca, Na at the bottom are the great electron donors. A negative $E^\ominus$ means the couple is a stronger reducing agent than the H⁺/H₂ couple; a positive one, weaker.

Predicting Whether a Reaction Goes

For any proposed redox reaction, the species being reduced acts as the cathode couple

and the species being oxidised as the anode couple:

E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} = E^\ominus_{\text{cathode}} - E^\ominus_{\text{anode}}

Worked feel: can Fe³⁺ oxidise iodide? $E^\ominus(\text{Fe}^{3+}/\text{Fe}^{2+}) = +0.77$ V is above $E^\ominus(\text{I}_2/\text{I}^-) = +0.54$ V, so

$E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} = +0.23$ V — yes. Can silver metal reduce Fe³⁺?

$0.77 - 0.80 = -0.03$ V — no.

This is also the logic of the activity series: a metal displaces, from solution, …

Why this formula?

Galvanic Corrosion: Why the Key Formulas Hold

Galvanic corrosion occurs when two dissimilar metals are electrically connected in the presence of an electrolyte. The key formula that governs this is the mixed potential theory, which leads to the galvanic current and corrosion rate expressions.

Let's build the reasoning step-by-step.

1. The Core Idea: Two Electrodes, One Circuit

When metals M₁ (more active, e.g., zinc) and M₂ (more noble, e.g., copper) are connected:

M₁ acts as the anode — it oxidizes (corrodes):

\text{M}_1 \rightarrow \text{M}_1^{n+} + n e^-

M₂ acts as the cathode — it reduces something (e.g., oxygen or H⁺):

\text{O}_2 + 2\text{H}_2\text{O} + 4e^- \rightarrow 4\text{OH}^- \quad \text{(in neutral/alkaline)}

2\text{H}^+ + 2e^- \rightarrow \text{H}_2 \quad \text{(in acidic)}

The two metals are electrically connected (via a wire or direct contact), and the electrolyte completes the circuit. Electrons flow from M₁ to M₂.

2. The Mixed Potential: Why It Exists

Each metal, when alone in the electrolyte, has its own open-circuit potential (OCP) — the equilibrium potential for its half-reaction. For M₁, it's $E_{\text{corr},1}$ ; for M₂, it's $E_{\text{corr},2}$ .

When connected, the system cannot stay at two different potentials. The entire metal couple must reach a single potential — the mixed potential $E_{\text{mix}}$ .

$E_{\text{mix}}$ lies between $E_{\text{corr},1}$ and $E_{\text{corr},2}$ .
At $E_{\text{mix}}$ , the total anodic current from M₁ equals the total cathodic current from M₂ (charge conservation):

I_{\text{anode}} = I_{\text{cathode}}

This is the fundamental equation of galvanic corrosion.

3. Deriving the Galvanic Current

Assume each electrode follows Butler-Volmer kinetics (for activation-controlled reactions). For the anode (M₁), the anodic current density $i_a$ at potential $E$ is:

i_a = i_{0,1} \exp\left( \frac{\alpha_a F (E - E_{0,1})}{RT} \right)

For the cathode (M₂), the cathodic current density $i_c$ is:

i_c = i_{0,2} \exp\left( -\frac{\alpha_c F (E - E_{0,2})}{RT} \right)

Where:

$i_{0,1}, i_{0,2}$ = exchange current densities
$\alpha_a, \alpha_c$ = transfer coefficients (typically ~0.5)
$F$ = Faraday constant
$R$ = gas constant
$T$ = temperature
$E_{0,1}, E_{0,2}$ = standard reduction potentials

At the mixed potential $E_{\text{mix}}$ :

I_{\text{galvanic}} = A_1 \cdot i_a(E_{\text{mix}}) = A_2 \cdot i_c(E_{\text{mix}})

Where $A_1$ and $A_2$ are the surface areas of the anode and cathode.

Why this holds: The net current from the anode must exactly balance the net current consumed at the cathode — otherwise, charge would accumulate, which is impossible in a steady-state circuit.

4. The Corrosion Rate Formula

The corrosion rate (mass loss per time) of the anode is given by Faraday's law:

\text{Corrosion rate} = \frac{I_{\text{galvanic}} \cdot M}{n \cdot F \cdot \rho}

Where:

$M$ = molar mass of the anode metal
$n$ = number of electrons transferred per atom
$\rho$ = density of the metal
$F$ = Faraday constant (96,485 C/mol)

Why this holds: Each mole of metal oxidized releases $n$ moles of electrons. The total charge passed $Q = I_{\text{galvanic}} \cdot t$ corresponds to moles of metal lost:

\text{moles lost} = \frac{Q}{nF} = \frac{I_{\text{galvanic}} \cdot t}{nF}

Multiply by $M/\rho$ to get volume or thickness loss.

5. The Area Effect: Why It Matters

From the mixed potential equation:

A_1 \cdot i_a(E_{\text{mix}}) = A_2 \cdot i_c(E_{\text{mix}})

If the cathode area $A_2$ is large relative to the anode area $A_1$ , then $i_a(E_{\text{mix}})$ must be large to balance the current. This means:

Small anode + large cathode → severe galvanic corrosion (high current density on the anode). …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

A redox reaction is feasible only if the cell potential $E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} > 0$ . For each pair, we identify the stronger oxidising agent (higher $E^\ominus$ ) and the stronger reducing agent (lower $E^\ominus$ ), then compute $E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} = E^\ominus_{\text{cathode}} - E^\ominus_{\text{anode}}$ . The pair with $E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} < 0$ is not feasible — that is option (iv).

The standard electrode potential $E^\ominus$ measures the tendency of a species to get reduced. A higher (more positive) $E^\ominus$ means a stronger oxidising agent — it wants to gain electrons. A lower $E^\ominus$ means a stronger reducing agent — it wants to lose electrons. For a spontaneous redox reaction, the stronger oxidant must react with the stronger reductant, giving a positive cell potential.

The cell potential is calculated as:

E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} = E^\ominus_{\text{cathode (reduction)}} - E^\ominus_{\text{anode (oxidation)}}

If $E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} > 0$ , the reaction is feasible (spontaneous). If $E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} < 0$ , it is not.

Let’s examine each pair.

Pair (i): Fe³⁺ and I⁻ Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ has $E^\ominus = +0.77$ V; I₂/I⁻ has $E^\ominus = +0.54$ V. Fe³⁺ is the stronger oxidant (higher potential), so it gets reduced: Fe³⁺ + e⁻ → Fe²⁺. I⁻ is the stronger reductant (lower potential), so it gets oxidised: 2I⁻ → I₂ + 2e⁻.

E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} = 0.77 - 0.54 = +0.23\ \text{V} > 0

Feasible.

Pair (ii): Ag⁺ and Cu Ag⁺/Ag has $E^\ominus = +0.80$ V; Cu²⁺/Cu has $E^\ominus = +0.34$ V. Ag⁺ is the stronger oxidant, so it gets reduced: Ag⁺ + e⁻ → Ag. Cu is the stronger reductant, so it gets oxidised: Cu → Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻.

E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} = 0.80 - 0.34 = +0.46\ \text{V} > 0

Feasible.

Pair (iii): Fe³⁺ and Cu Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ has $E^\ominus = +0.77$ V; Cu²⁺/Cu has $E^\ominus = +0.34$ V. Fe³⁺ is the stronger oxidant, so it gets reduced: Fe³⁺ + e⁻ → Fe²⁺. Cu is the stronger reductant, so it gets oxidised: Cu → Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻.

E^\ominus_{\text{cell}} = 0.77 - 0.34 = +0.43\ \text{V} > 0

Feasible.

Pair (iv): Ag and Fe³⁺ Here we have Ag (metal) and Fe³⁺ (ion). Ag⁺/Ag has $E^\ominus = +0.80$ V; Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ has $E^\ominus = +0.77$ V. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ3 — E⊖ values of some redox couples are given below. On the basis of these…→Next questionQ5 — Thiosulphate reacts differently with iodine and bromine in the reactio…

Q.Using the standard electrode potential, find out the pair between which redox reaction is not feasible. E⊖ values: Fe^3+/Fe^2+ = +0.77; I2/I^- = +0.54; Cu^2+/Cu = +0.34; Ag^+/Ag = +0.80 V

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.Using the standard electrode potential, find out the pair between which redox reaction is not feasible.
E⊖ values: Fe^3+/Fe^2+ = +0.77; I2/I^- = +0.54; Cu^2+/Cu = +0.34; Ag^+/Ag = +0.80 V

Unlock everything free for 14 days