Q.(a) "In an economy, the autonomous consumption is ₹ 100 and Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is 0.6. If the equilibrium level of Income is 2,000, then the autonomous investment is ₹ 300." Justify the statement with valid calculation.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Part (a)Concept understanding — Aggregate Demand Equilibrium
Aggregate Demand Equilibrium: The Economy's Balancing Act
Think of a seesaw. On one side sits everything people, firms, and the government want to buy. On the other side sits everything firms produce. When the seesaw is perfectly level — when total spending exactly matches total output — the economy is in equilibrium. That's the core idea.
But why should you care? Because when the seesaw tilts, real things happen. If spending exceeds output, prices rise (inflation). If output exceeds spending, factories shut down and people lose jobs. Equilibrium is the sweet spot where neither happens.
The Precise Meaning
In macroeconomics, Aggregate Demand (AD) is the total planned spending on final goods and services in an economy during a given period. Aggregate Supply (AS) is the total output firms plan to produce.
Equilibrium occurs where:
AD=AS
At this point, what buyers intend to spend exactly equals what sellers intend to produce. No unwanted inventories pile up, and no shortages force prices up. The economy is "at rest."
Y=C+I+G+(X−M)
Where:
- Y = National Income (also equals Aggregate Supply)
- C = Household consumption expenditure
- I = Investment expenditure by firms
- G = Government spending on goods and services
- X = Exports
- M = Imports
- (X−M) = Net exports
This is the AD identity from your NCERT textbook. It tells you that total spending in the economy comes from four sources: households, firms, government, and foreigners (net of what we buy from them).
How Equilibrium Actually Works
Imagine a simple economy with only households and firms. Households earn income Y from firms. They spend part of it on consumption C and save the rest S. Firms produce output and also invest I (buying machines, building factories).
Equilibrium condition becomes:
Y=C+I
But households don't spend all their income. They save. So C=Y−S. Substituting:
Y=(Y−S)+I
Which simplifies to:
S=I
In equilibrium, planned savings must equal planned investment. This is the Keynesian cross condition. If people save more than firms invest, total spending falls short of output — inventories pile up, firms cut production, and income falls until savings and investment match again.
The 45° Line Diagram (Describe It)
Draw a graph with Aggregate Demand (AD) on the vertical axis and National Income (Y) on the horizontal axis.
- Draw a 45° line from the origin. Every point on this line represents AD=Y — the equilibrium condition.
- Draw the AD curve (which is C+I+G+(X−M)). It slopes upward because as income rises, consumption rises.
- Where the AD curve crosses the 45° line — that's the equilibrium point. …
Part (b)Concept understanding — Marginal Propensity to Consume
Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC)
Start with everyday intuition
Think about what happens when you get some extra money — say, a ₹500 bonus from your part-time job, or a cash gift on your birthday. You don't save all of it, and you don't spend all of it either. Most people spend a part and save the rest. That part you spend — the fraction of the extra income that goes into consumption — is exactly what economists call the Marginal Propensity to Consume.
The word "marginal" here means "extra" or "additional." So MPC answers one simple question: Out of every extra rupee you earn, how much do you spend?
The precise meaning
Formally, MPC is the ratio of change in consumption expenditure to the change in income that brought it about.
MPC=ΔYΔC
where ΔC = change in consumption, ΔY = change in income.
For example, if your income rises by ₹1,000 and your consumption rises by ₹750, your MPC is 750/1000=0.75 (or 75%). This means you spend 75 paise of every extra rupee and save the remaining 25 paise.
The other side of the coin is the Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) — the fraction of extra income that is saved. Since every extra rupee is either spent or saved:
MPC+MPS=1
This is not a theory; it's an accounting identity. If MPC = 0.75, then MPS must be 0.25.
Why MPC matters
MPC is not just a number — it is the engine of the multiplier effect, one of the most powerful ideas in macroeconomics.
When someone spends money, that spending becomes someone else's income. That second person, in turn, spends a fraction (their MPC) of that income, which becomes a third person's income, and so on. A single initial injection of spending — say, government investment in a road — ripples through the economy, generating total income many times larger than the original spending.
The size of this ripple depends directly on MPC. The higher the MPC, the larger the multiplier.
Multiplier (k)=1−MPC1=MPS1
If MPC = 0.8, the multiplier is 1/(1−0.8)=5. An initial ₹100 crore investment can generate ₹500 crore of total income. If MPC = 0.5, the multiplier is only 2.
A word on the diagram …
Part (a)
Equilibrium income satisfies Y=C+I, with consumption function C=Cˉ+bY.
Given Cˉ=100, b=0.6, Y=2000:
C=100+0.6×2000=100+1200=1300
Using Y=C+I:
2000=1300+I⇒I=700 …
- Part (a): C=100+0.6(2000)=1300, so I=2000−1300=₹700 — the claim of ₹300 is not justified.
- Part (b): At equilibrium S=I=70; with autonomous saving −1000, MPS=1070/4400≈0.24.
Part (a)
In a two-sector economy, equilibrium income occurs where aggregate demand equals aggregate supply, i.e. Y=C+I. Consumption has an autonomous part Cˉ and an induced part bY, where b is the marginal propensity to consume; investment I is autonomous.
C=Cˉ+bYandY=C+I
Given Cˉ=100, b=0.6, Y=2000:
C=100+(0.6×2000)=100+1200=1300
Now apply the equilibrium condition:
2000=1300+I⇒I=2000−1300=700
The autonomous investment is ₹700 crore. Since the statement claims ₹300 crore, and 700=300, the statement is not justified. …
- TBSE Tripura Higher Secondary (+2 Stage) Examination (Commerce) 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.The 'Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act' (MGNREGA) scheme provides ______.(a) Wage-based employment(b) Self-employment(c) Permanent or regular salaried employment(d) All of the above
›Reveal solutionSolution
MGNREGA guarantees wage employment (manual work paid a daily wage), not self-employment or permanent salaried jobs.
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 gives every rural household a legal right to demand up to 100 days of unskilled manual work per year on public works (roads, water conservation, land development, etc.), and the worker is paid a statutory daily wage if work is not provided within 15 days. It is therefore wage-based employment — it does not set anyone up in their own enterprise (self-employ …
- TBSE Tripura Higher Secondary (+2 Stage) Examination (Commerce) 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following is correct?(a) MPC + MPS = 1(b) 1 − MPC = MPS(c) 1 − MPS = MPC(d) All of the above
›Reveal solutionSolution
MPC + MPS = 1 is the basic identity; 1 − MPC = MPS and 1 − MPS = MPC are just the same equation rearranged — all three options are correct.
Every extra rupee of disposable income (ΔY) that a household receives is, by definition, either consumed or saved: ΔY = ΔC + ΔS. Dividing through by ΔY gives MPC + MPS = 1, where MPC = ΔC/ΔY (marginal propensity to consume) and MPS = ΔS/ΔY (marginal propensity to save). This single identity can be algebraically rearranged in two equivalent ways: 1 − MPC = MPS (subtract MPC from both sides) and 1 − MPS = MPC (subtract MPS from b …
- TBSE Tripura Higher Secondary (+2 Stage) Examination (Commerce) 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.Which of the following is responsible for an increase in aggregate demand?(a) Decrease in imports(b) Increase in investment expenditure(c) Increase in government expenditure(d) All of the above
›Reveal solutionSolution
Aggregate demand has four components (consumption, investment, government spending, net exports), and all three listed changes raise one of these components — so AD rises in every case.
In an open economy, AD = C + I + G + (X − M). Each option affects a different component:
- A decrease in imports (M) raises net exports (X − M), directly raising AD.
- An increase in investment expenditure (I) by firms directly adds to AD. …
- TBSE Tripura Higher Secondary (+2 Stage) Examination (Commerce) 2026Set ANNUAL1 markQ.If disposable income is Rs. 1000 crore, and the level of consumption is Rs. 800 crore, what will be the average propensity to consume?
›Reveal solutionSolution
APC = C / Y = 800 / 1000 = 0.8.
The Average Propensity to Consume measures what fraction of total disposable income is spent on consumption, calculated as APC = C/Y, where C is the level of consumption expenditure and Y is disposable income. Here, disposable income Y = Rs. 1,000 crore and consumption C = Rs. 800 crore, so:
APC = 800 / 1000 = 0.8
…
- CA Foundation 2025Set may-20251 markMCQQ.Under the Keynesian theory of determination of national income, the assumption is that the consumption increases with an increase in disposable income but the increase in consumption will be _______ the increase in disposable income. (A) Equal to (B) Opposite to (C) Greater than (D) Less than
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Keynes's fundamental psychological law, a rise in income raises consumption by less than the rise in income.
Step 1 — Keynes's psychological law of consumption
Keynes held that as disposable income increases, consumption increases too, but not by the full amount of the increase — people save a part of the additional income.
Step 2 — Express with MPC
The marginal propensity to consume measures the share of extra income that is consumed:
MPC=ΔYΔC,0<MPC<1
Since MPC<1, the change in consumption ΔC is less than the change in disposable income ΔY. …
- CA Foundation 2025Set may-20251 markMCQQ.Which of the following is true in respect of relation of Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) and Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS) as per the Keynesian theory of determination of National Income ? (A) MPC = MPS (B) MPC + MPS = 1 (C) MPC + MPS = 0 (D) No relation exists between MPC and MPS
›Reveal solutionSolution
Because extra income is either spent or saved, MPC + MPS = 1.
Step 1 — Split additional income
A change in disposable income (ΔY) is divided between a change in consumption (ΔC) and a change in saving (ΔS):
ΔY=ΔC+ΔS
Step 2 — Divide through by ΔY
ΔYΔC+ΔYΔS=1⇒MPC+MPS=1
So the two marginal propensities always sum to one, and MPS = 1 − MPC.
Why the other options are wrong: (A) MPC = MPS only in the special case where each equals 0.5; it is not a general rule. (C) MPC + MPS = 0 is impossible, since both are non-negative and their sum is 1. (D) A definite relation clearly exists, so 'no relation' is wrong. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.