Q.Let and be the relation in defined by if for in . Prove that is an equivalence relation and also obtain the equivalent class .
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →The relation is an equivalence relation because it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. The equivalence class is the set of all ordered pairs such that , i.e., , giving .
The core idea here is that the condition can be rearranged to . So two ordered pairs are related precisely when they have the same difference between the first and second components. This immediately suggests that the relation groups pairs by a common number — the difference . Proving it's an equivalence relation then becomes a matter of checking that "having the same difference" is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
Let’s go step by step.
-
Reflexive: For any , we need .
Check the condition: is always true (addition is commutative). So is reflexive.
-
Symmetric: If , then . We need , i.e., .
But and , so the equality directly gives . Hence is symmetric.
-
Transitive: Suppose and . Then:
Add the two equations:
Cancel and from both sides (they appear on both left and right):
That is exactly . So is transitive.
Since is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, it is an equivalence relation.
Notice we never used the specific numbers 1 through 9 in the proof above — the same reasoning works for any set of integers. The only place the set matters is when we find the equivalence class, because the pairs must come from . …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.