An infinite line charge produces a field of $9 \times 10^{4}\,\text{N/C}$ at a distance of $2\,\text{cm}$. Calculate the linear charge density.

An infinite line charge produces a field of 9 × 10⁴N/C at a distance of 2cm. Calculate the linear charge densi

Exercises · 1.22

9 \times 10^{4}\,\text{N/C}

Tripura TbseTextbookSubjective· 2mImportance★★★★★

51% · 34/67 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Gauss Law

Gauss's Law is a shortcut. Instead of adding up the Coulomb contribution of every charge — a nightmare of vectors and integrals — it lets you read the field straight off the symmetry of a problem. The whole idea rests on one quantity: electric flux.

Flux — field-lines counted through a surface. For a uniform field E crossing a flat area A, the flux is Φ = E·A = EA cosθ, where θ is the angle between the field and the normal to the surface. Picture the field as a bundle of lines; flux is how many pierce the surface. When E is edge-on (θ = 90°) nothing passes through and Φ = 0; when E is ⊥ to the surface (θ = 0) the count is maximal. For a closed surface, Φ is the net number of lines leaving it — lines that enter and exit cancel.

The law itself. Gauss's law states that the net flux out of any closed surface depends only on the charge trapped inside:

Φ = q_enclosed / ε₀.

Two consequences do most of the work. First, only enclosed charge counts — a charge outside sends as many lines in as out, so its net contribution is exactly zero. Second, the surface's shape is irrelevant; move the charge around inside or deform the surface, and Φ never changes.

Why symmetry makes it powerful. By itself Φ = q/ε₀ has E buried in an integral. It becomes a tool only when you pick a Gaussian surface matched to the symmetry — one where E is constant and everywhere either ⊥ to the surface (so Φ = EA) or ∥ to it (contributing nothing). Then E slides out and you solve in one line. This works for exactly three geometries:

1 — Infinite line charge (linear density λ). Use a coaxial cylinder: E = λ / 2πε₀r, falling off as ∝ 1/r.

2 — Infinite sheet (surface density σ). Use a pillbox pierced through the sheet: E = σ / 2ε₀ — uniform and completely independent of distance. The field near a large charged plane simply doesn't weaken as you step back. …

Why this formula?

Gauss's Law: Why It Holds

Gauss's Law is one of the four Maxwell's equations and a cornerstone of electromagnetism. Let's build the understanding from the ground up — not just the formula, but the why.

1. The Core Idea: Flux as "Flow" of Field

Imagine an electric field $\vec{E}$ passing through a small patch of area $dA$ . The electric flux through that patch is:

d\Phi_E = \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = E \, dA \cos\theta

where $\theta$ is the angle between $\vec{E}$ and the outward normal to the surface.

Why this definition?

If $\vec{E}$ is perpendicular to the surface ( $\theta = 0$ ), maximum field "flows through".
If $\vec{E}$ is parallel ( $\theta = 90^\circ$ ), no flux — the field just slides along the surface.

Total flux through a closed surface $S$ is:

\Phi_E = \oint_S \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}

2. The Key Insight: Flux Depends Only on Enclosed Charge

Consider a single point charge $+q$ at the centre of a spherical surface of radius $r$ .

By Coulomb's law, at every point on the sphere: $E = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2}$ , radially outward.
The area vector $d\vec{A}$ is also radially outward.
So $\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = E \, dA$ everywhere.

The total flux:

\Phi_E = \oint E \, dA = E \oint dA = \left( \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} \right) (4\pi r^2) = \frac{q}{\varepsilon_0}

Notice: The $r^2$ cancels! The flux is independent of the radius.

3. Why Shape Doesn't Matter

Now, what if the surface is not spherical but any closed shape enclosing the charge?

Draw a small cone from the charge to the surface.
The flux through a patch $dA$ at distance $r$ is $d\Phi = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} \cos\theta \, dA$ .
But $\frac{\cos\theta \, dA}{r^2}$ is exactly the solid angle $d\Omega$ subtended by $dA$ at the charge.

So $d\Phi = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} d\Omega$ .

Integrating over the entire closed surface: $\oint d\Omega = 4\pi$ (total solid angle around a point).

Hence:

\Phi_E = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \cdot 4\pi = \frac{q}{\varepsilon_0}

Result: For any closed surface enclosing $q$ , the flux is $\frac{q}{\varepsilon_0}$ .

4. Multiple Charges: Superposition

If there are many charges $q_1, q_2, \dots, q_n$ inside the surface, the total electric field is the vector sum of individual fields:

\vec{E} = \vec{E}_1 + \vec{E}_2 + \dots + \vec{E}_n

Flux is linear: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Applying Gauss's law to a coaxial cylinder gives $E=\lambda/2\pi\varepsilon_0 r$ ; inverting for the given $E$ and $r$ yields $\lambda=2\pi\varepsilon_0 rE=1.0\times10^{-7}\,\text{C/m}=0.1\,\mu\text{C/m}$ .

An infinite line charge has cylindrical symmetry: the field is radial and its magnitude depends only on the perpendicular distance $r$ . This makes a coaxial cylinder the natural Gaussian surface.

Step 1 — Gaussian surface. Take a cylinder of radius $r$ and length $L$ coaxial with the line. It encloses charge $q_{\text{enc}}=\lambda L$ .

Step 2 — Flux. $\vec E$ is perpendicular to the curved wall (area $2\pi r L$ ) and parallel to the flat end caps (zero flux there), so

\Phi_E=E(2\pi r L).

Step 3 — Gauss's law.

E(2\pi r L)=\frac{\lambda L}{\varepsilon_0}\ \Rightarrow\ E=\frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 r},

the length $L$ cancelling, as it must for an infinite line. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Common Mistakes with Gauss Law: Line Charge Problem

Mistake 1: Using the Wrong Formula for Field of a Line Charge

The error: Students often confuse the electric field formulas for different charge distributions — using the point charge formula ( $E = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2}$ ) or the infinite sheet formula ( $E = \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}$ ) instead of the line charge formula.

Why it's wrong: Each charge distribution has a unique symmetry, and Gauss Law gives a different result for each. For an infinite line charge, the field falls off as $1/r$ , not $1/r^2$ .

How to avoid: Memorise the three standard results from Gauss Law:

Point charge: $E \propto \frac{1}{r^2}$
Infinite line charge: $E \propto \frac{1}{r}$
Infinite sheet: $E$ is constant (independent of distance)

For this problem, the correct formula is:

E = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 r}

where $\lambda$ is the linear charge density.

Mistake 2: Forgetting to Convert Units

The error: Using $r = 2$ directly in the formula without converting cm to m.

Why it's wrong: All SI units must be consistent. The electric field is in N/C, $\varepsilon_0$ has units of $\text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2$ , so distance must be in metres.

How to avoid: Always write the conversion step explicitly:

r = 2\,\text{cm} = 2 \times 10^{-2}\,\text{m} = 0.02\,\text{m}

Mistake 3: Incorrect Value or Units of $\varepsilon_0$

The error: Using $\varepsilon_0 = 8.85 \times 10^{-12}$ but forgetting the units, or using $9 \times 10^9$ (which is $\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}$ ) without adjusting the formula.

Why it's wrong: The formula $E = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 r}$ uses $\varepsilon_0$ directly. If you use $k = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}$ , the formula becomes:

E = \frac{2k\lambda}{r}

Both are correct — but mixing them up gives wrong answers.

How to avoid: Stick to one consistent form throughout the calculation. I recommend:

E = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 r}

with $\varepsilon_0 = 8.85 \times 10^{-12} \, \text{C}^2/\text{N·m}^2$ .

Mistake 4: Algebraic Errors While Solving for $\lambda$

The error: Rearranging incorrectly — for example, writing $\lambda = E \times 2\pi\varepsilon_0 r$ instead of $\lambda = E \times 2\pi\varepsilon_0 r$ (this one is actually correct, but students often multiply/divide the wrong terms).

How to avoid: Write the rearrangement step-by-step:

$E = \frac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0 r}$ …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

Higher Secondary (+2 Stage) Examination 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. An electric dipole formed by charges +q and -q separated by a distance 'd' is placed inside a hollow sphere of radius 'r' (2r > d). The electric flux through the surface of the sphere is —$
(a) q/ε0, outward
(b) 2q/ε0, inward
(c) 2q/ε0, outward
(d) zero
›Reveal solutionSolution

By Gauss's law, flux depends only on the net enclosed charge; a dipole has zero net charge, so the total flux through any closed surface enclosing it is zero.

By Gauss's theorem,

$\Phi_E = \frac{q_{enclosed}}{\varepsilon_0}$

Here the sphere of radius r (with 2r > d) encloses both charges of the dipole, +q and -q. The net enclosed charge is

$q_{enclosed} = (+q) + (-q) = 0$ …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
Higher Secondary (+2 Stage) Examination 2024Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. A charge Q is enclosed by a spherical Gaussian surface of radius R. If the radius is doubled, the outward electric flux -$
(a) will decrease to half
(b) will remain the same
(c) will double
(d) will increase four-fold
›Reveal solutionSolution

Gauss's law says the outward electric flux through a closed surface depends only on the charge enclosed, never on the size or shape of the surface.

By Gauss's law:

$\Phi_E = \oint \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}$

The enclosed charge is still $Q$ even after the radius is doubled to $2R$ — no charge has been added or removed, only the surface has grown. Since $\Phi_E$ depends only on $Q_{\text{enc}}$ and $\varepsilon_0$ (both unchanged), the flux is unaffected by the change in radius. (What …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous question1.21 — A uniformly charged conducting sphere of 2.4m diameter has a surface c…→Next question1.23 — Two large, thin metal plates are parallel and close to each other. On …

Q.An infinite line charge produces a field of $9 \times 10^{4}\,\text{N/C}$ at a distance of $2\,\text{cm}$ . Calculate the linear charge density.

Concept understanding — Gauss Law

Why this formula?

Gauss's Law: Why It Holds

1. The Core Idea: Flux as "Flow" of Field

2. The Key Insight: Flux Depends Only on Enclosed Charge

3. Why Shape Doesn't Matter

4. Multiple Charges: Superposition

Method: Gauss's Law for an Infinite Line Charge

Why Gauss's Law?

Steps

Numerical Calculation

Common Mistakes with Gauss Law: Line Charge Problem

Mistake 1: Using the Wrong Formula for Field of a Line Charge

Mistake 2: Forgetting to Convert Units

Mistake 3: Incorrect Value or Units of $\varepsilon_0$

Mistake 4: Algebraic Errors While Solving for $\lambda$

Q.An infinite line charge produces a field of 9×104 N/C9 \times 10^{4}\,\text{N/C}9×104N/C at a distance of 2 cm2\,\text{cm}2cm. Calculate the linear charge density.

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.An infinite line charge produces a field of $9 \times 10^{4}\,\text{N/C}$ at a distance of $2\,\text{cm}$ . Calculate the linear charge density.

Unlock everything free for 14 days