Q.For the (positron) emission from a nucleus, there is another competing process known as electron capture (electron from an inner orbit, say, the K-shell, is captured by the nucleus and a neutrino is emitted).
[!FORMULA]
Show that if emission is energetically allowed, electron capture is necessarily allowed but not vice-versa.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Compare the two processes' Q-value conditions in terms of atomic mass difference : needs , electron capture only needs — a much weaker requirement — so being allowed guarantees electron capture is allowed, but the reverse is not guaranteed.
Setting up both Q-value expressions (using atomic masses)
For emission:
Since the parent atom's neutral mass includes electrons and the daughter's includes , and a positron is also created:
For this decay to be energetically allowed, , i.e.:
For electron capture:
Here an extra electron is consumed (added to the left side), so:
For electron capture to be allowed, , i.e.:
Comparing the two conditions
Let . Condition (1) requires ; condition (2) requires only . Since (both being real, ), condition (1) is strictly the more demanding one:
So whenever emission is energetically possible (), the mass difference automatically also satisfies , meaning electron capture is necessarily allowed too. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.