Q.The sum of three numbers is 6. If we multiply third number by 3 and add second number to it, we get 11. By adding first and third numbers, we get double of the second number. Represent it algebraically and find the numbers using matrix method.
Solving a System of Equations by the Matrix Method
A system of linear equations can be written as a single matrix equation and solved in one clean step using the inverse of a matrix. This is the Class-12 "matrix method" for simultaneous equations.
If det(A)=0, then A−1 exists, and multiplying both sides on the left by A−1 gives
X=A−1B,where A−1=det(A)1adj(A).
So you compute det(A), then adj(A), form A−1, and multiply by B. The single column X=A−1B hands you x, y, z at once, and because A−1 is unique, the solution is unique.
Watch out
Multiply in the correct order: X=A−1B, not BA−1. Matrix multiplication is not commutative, and BA−1 is not even defined here.
When det(A)=0
If det(A)=0, A−1 does not exist and the inverse method fails. The system is then either inconsistent (no solution) or has infinitely many solutions. Decide which by computing (adjA)B:
(adjA)B=O → no solution (inconsistent).
(adjA)B=O → infinitely many solutions (consistent, dependent). …
This is a system of three linear equations in three unknowns. Representing it as AX=B and solving via the matrix method (inverse) gives the numbers as x=1, y=2, z=3.
We have three unknown numbers. Let them be x, y, and z — first, second, and third respectively. The problem gives three conditions, each translating directly into an equation.
The first condition: "The sum of three numbers is 6" gives
x+y+z=6.
The second: "If we multiply third number by 3 and add second number to it, we get 11" means
3z+y=11or0x+y+3z=11.
The third: "By adding first and third numbers, we get double of the second number" means
x+z=2y⇒x−2y+z=0.
So the system is:
⎩⎨⎧x+y+z=60x+y+3z=11x−2y+z=0
Why use the matrix method? Because once we write this as AX=B, solving X=A−1B is systematic — no back-substitution guesswork, and it works cleanly for any 3×3 system with a unique solution.
Step 1: Write in matrix form AX=B
A=10111−2131,X=xyz,B=6110
Step 2: Find the determinant of A to check if the inverse exists
det(A)=1⋅1−231−1⋅0131+1⋅011−2
Compute each minor:
First: (1)(1)−(3)(−2)=1+6=7
Second: (0)(1)−(3)(1)=0−3=−3
Third: (0)(−2)−(1)(1)=0−1=−1
So det(A)=1(7)−1(−3)+1(−1)=7+3−1=9.
Since det(A)=9=0, the inverse exists and the solution is unique.
Step 3: Find the adjoint of A (transpose of the cofactor matrix)
Method: Translating a Word Problem into a Linear System, Then Solving by the Matrix Method
This method turns a worded description of relationships between unknown numbers into a system of linear equations, then applies the standard matrix (adjoint) method to solve it.
Steps
Step 1: Name the unknowns
Assign a variable to each unknown quantity described in the problem (e.g. x,y,z for "first number," "second number," "third number").
Step 2: Translate each sentence into one equation
Go through the problem sentence by sentence. Each stated relationship ("the sum is...", "multiply ... and add...", "adding ... gives double...") becomes exactly one linear equation — translate literally, phrase by phrase, rather than trying to guess the final system from memory.
Step 3: Collect the equations and write them in standard form
Rearrange each equation so all variable terms are on one side and the constant is on the other, matching the standard a1x+b1y+c1z=d1 pattern.
Step 4: Package as AX=B and solve via the adjoint method
Follow the standard matrix method: compute det(A), find all cofactors, transpose to get adj(A), then X=det(A)1adj(A)B.
Step 5: Translate the numeric solution back into the word problem's language …
Mistake 1: Mistranslating a sentence into the wrong equation
Why it's wrong: "if we multiply the third number by 3 and add the second number to it, we get 11" translates to 3z+y=11 — but it's easy to instead write 3(y+z)=11 or y+3z=13 if the sentence is read too quickly. Correct approach: translate phrase by phrase, writing down each operation ("multiply third by 3," "add second," "get 11") as it's read, rather than trying to write the whole equation from memory of the sentence.
Mistake 2: A sign error in one of the nine cofactors during the adjoint computation, given three unknowns …