Biology · Ch 6 — Anatomy of Flowering Plants
Dicot vs Monocot: A Comparative Summary
Dicot vs Monocot: A Comparative Summary
Comparing the root, the stem and the leaf side by side across a dicot and a monocot plant reveals that their many anatomical differences are not a random list of unrelated facts -- almost all of them can be traced back to just two underlying causes.
The first cause is how many vascular bundles are laid down, and how they are arranged. A dicot root forms a compact, limited number of xylem patches (diarch to hexarch) radiating from a small or absent pith, while a monocot root forms many more (polyarch) around a large, persistent pith. A dicot stem arranges a limited number of vascular bundles in a single peripheral ring around a large central pith, leaving a clearly differentiated cortex outside that ring; a monocot stem instead scatters numerous bundles without any ring pattern through an undifferentiated ground tissue, so it never develops a true cortex-pith distinction at all. Even the choice of hypodermis tissue follows from this same logic: a dicot stem, whose vascular bundles are confined to a ring and whose cortex must remain flexible while the stem is still growing, uses collenchyma for early mechanical support; a monocot stem, whose bundles are already scattered and reinforced by their own individual sclerenchymatous bundle sheaths, instead uses rigid sclerenchyma as its hypodermis from the outset.
The second cause is the presence or absence of a vascular cambium. A dicot's vascular bundles are open -- a strip of cambium separates xylem from phloem within each bundle -- which is precisely what allows the fascicular and interfascicular cambium to join into a continuous ring and drive secondary growth, thickening the stem and root over years. A monocot's vascular bundles are closed -- no cambium is present -- so once a bundle is formed it cannot enlarge further, and the plant as a whole is, with rare exceptions, unable to thicken after its primary growth is complete. This single structural difference alone explains why dicot stems can become the woody trunks of trees and shrubs while monocot stems generally cannot. …
Feature | Dicotyledonous plant | Monocotyledonous plant
Root -- xylem bundles | Few (diarch to hexarch, 2-6) | Many (polyarch, more than 6)
Root -- pith | Small or absent | Large and well developed
Stem -- hypodermis | Collenchymatous | Sclerenchymatous
Stem -- vascular bundles | Limited in number, arranged in a single ring | Numerous, scattered through the ground tissue
Stem -- cambium / secondary growth | Present between xylem and phloem (open bundle); secondary growth usually occurs | Absent (closed bundle); secondary growth usually does not occur
Leaf -- mesophyll | Differentiated into palisade and spongy parenchyma | Undifferentiated, uniform chlorenchyma …