Skip to content

Physics · Ch 13 — Oscillations

Combination of Springs: Series and Parallel

13.8

Combination of Springs: Series and Parallel

When two (or more) springs act together to support a single oscillating block, the whole combination behaves exactly like ONE single equivalent spring, with some effective, combined force constant keqk_{\text{eq}} that depends both on the individual force constants of the springs used, AND on exactly how those springs are connected together. Two arrangements matter most.\n\nSeries combination. Two springs of force constants k1k_1 and k2k_2 are joined end to end, so that the SAME applied force FF is transmitted through both springs, one after the other, to the block. Each spring then stretches by its own amount, according to Hooke's law applied separately to each: x1=F/k1x_1 = F/k_1 and x2=F/k2x_2 = F/k_2. The total extension of the whole series combination is the SUM of these two individual extensions,\n\nx=x1+x2=Fk1+Fk2x = x_1 + x_2 = \frac{F}{k_1} + \frac{F}{k_2}\n\nSince the equivalent single spring must satisfy x=F/ksx = F/k_s for the same applied force FF, dividing the equation above through by FF gives\n\n1ks=1k1+1k2⟹ks=k1k2k1+k2\frac{1}{k_s} = \frac{1}{k_1} + \frac{1}{k_2} \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad k_s = \frac{k_1 k_2}{k_1 + k_2}\n\n-- a formula with exactly the same reciprocal-sum structure as resistors connected in parallel in an electrical circuit. The series equivalent ksk_s is always SMALLER than either individual force constant k1k_1 or k2k_2 on its own, because joining two springs end to end always makes the overall combination easier to stretch (softer, more flexible) than either spring by itself.\n\nParallel combination. The two springs instead act side by side, both connected between the same fixed support and the same block, so that both springs are forced to stretch by the SAME displacement xx whenever the block moves, and the total restoring force on the block is the SUM of the two individual spring forces acting together,\n\nF=F1+F2=k1x+k2x=(k1+k2)xF = F_1 + F_2 = k_1x + k_2x = (k_1+k_2)x\n\nComparing this with F=kpxF = k_p x for a single equivalent spring gives, immediately,\n\nkp=k1+k2k_p = k_1 + k_2\n\nThe parallel equivalent kpk_p is always GREATER than either individual force constant on its own, since two springs acting side by side always make the combination stiffer, harder to stretch, than either spring alone.\n\nBoth results generalise direc …

Table 1Series versus parallel spring combinations
ArrangementWhat is common to both springsEquivalent force constantCompared to k1,k2k_1, k_2 individuallyExample (k1=200, k2=300 N/mk_1=200,\ k_2=300\ \text{N/m})
Series (end to end)Force FF (same through both)ks=k1k2k1+k2k_s = \dfrac{k_1 k_2}{k_1 + k_2}Smaller than either120 N/m120\ \text{N/m}