Commercial Law and Preliminaries of Auditing · Ch 4 — Routine Checking and Test Checking
Routine Checking
Routine Checking
(a) Routine Checking — Definition, Scope, Objectives, Advantages, Limitations
Definition. Routine Checking is the day-to-day, mechanical checking of the books of
account that are maintained by the business — verifying casting (totalling), carry-forwards
(page-to-page and ledger-to-ledger), posting from the subsidiary books to the ledger, and
balancing of accounts. It is essentially a check of the ROUTINE, CLERICAL accuracy of the books
as they are written up, performed on an ongoing basis rather than as a special, separate
exercise.
Working Definition
Routine Checking is the routine, mechanical verification of the arithmetical accuracy of the
books of account — checking totals, carry-forwards, postings, and balances — as a normal,
ongoing part of examining the accounts, without any special selection or sampling involved.
Scope of Routine Checking. Routine checking typically covers:
- Checking of casting — verifying that the totals of subsidiary books (Cash Book, Sales Book, Purchases Book, etc.) and ledger accounts have been correctly added up.
- Checking of carry-forwards — verifying that a total carried forward from one page to the next, or from one book to another, has been correctly and completely transferred.
- Checking of postings — verifying that every entry in a subsidiary book (or the journal) has been correctly posted to the correct account, on the correct side, and for the correct amount, in the ledger.
- Checking of balancing — verifying that ledger accounts have been correctly balanced (debit total minus credit total, or vice versa, correctly computed and carried down).
- Marking the checked figures with tick marks (a distinctive symbol used consistently through the audit, so a reviewer can see exactly what has already been verified) as each item is checked.
Objectives of Routine Checking:
- To ensure the basic arithmetical accuracy of the books of account.
- To detect clerical errors — errors of casting, carry-forward, posting, and balancing — that could otherwise distort the final accounts.
- To act as a foundation for the rest of the audit — an auditor cannot meaningfully verify the SUBSTANCE of transactions if the basic arithmetic underlying the books is itself unreliable.
- To provide a deterrent against casual carelessness in maintaining the books, since staff know the routine mechanical accuracy of their work will be checked.
Advantages of Routine Checking:
- Simple and mechanical — it can often be delegated to junior audit staff, since it mainly requires care and attention rather than deep judgment.
- Detects clerical errors reliably, since every relevant figure is actually checked, not merely sampled.
- Builds a solid foundation for the rest of the audit — once the basic arithmetic of the books is confirmed sound, the auditor can turn attention to the substance of transactions with more confidence.
- Discourages carelessness among the staff who maintain the books.
Limitations of Routine Checking:
- Time-consuming and costly, especially for a business with a very large volume of transactions — checking every single casting/posting/carry-forward across thousands of entries is a genuinely heavy workload.
- Purely mechanical — does not examine the SUBSTANCE of a transaction. Routine checking confirms that ₹10,000 was correctly added and correctly posted; it does NOT tell the auditor …
The day-to-day, mechanical verification of the arithmetical accuracy of the books of account — casting, carry-forwards, postings, and balancing — performed on an ongoing b …
A distinctive symbol placed against a figure/entry to indicate it has been checked, used consistently throughout an audit so reviewers can see what …