Q.Mr. Dutta owns a painting inherited from his grandfather, kept at home purely for personal enjoyment, and an old wooden dining table used by his family for years. He sells the painting at a profit. State, with reasons, whether the painting is a Capital Asset, and contrast this with the position of the dining table.
Section 2(14) excludes 'personal effects' — movable property, including wearing apparel and furniture, held for the personal use of the assessee or a dependent family member — from the definition of Capital Asset. However, the section specifically CARVES OUT of this exclusion: jewellery, archaeological collections, drawings, paintings, sculptures, and any work of art. These items remain Capital Assets even though they are held purely for personal use or display, precisely because the law treats them as having an investment character distinct from ordinary household articles.
Applying this to Mr. Dutta: the painting falls squarely within the carved-out category (a 'work of art'/'painting') and therefore REMAINS a Capital Asset despite being held only for personal enjoyment — any profit on its sale is potentially chargeable as Capital Gains. The wooden dining table, by contrast, is ordinary furniture held for personal/family use, exactly the kind of item the 'personal effects' exclusion is meant to cover, and is therefore NOT a Capital Asset — any gain (unlikely in practice for used furniture) on its disposal would not attract Capital Gains tax.
The painting is a Capital Asset — 'personal effects' excludes works of art/paintings from the exemption. The dining table, being ordinary personal-use furniture, is NOT a Capital Asset.
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.