Skip to content

Chemistry · Ch 10 — Coordination Compounds

Summary

Summary

  • Ligands and denticity: a ligand donates a lone pair to the central metal through one or more donor atoms — monodentate (one donor, e.g. NH3\text{NH}_3, Cl−\text{Cl}^-), bidentate (two donors, e.g. en\text{en}, oxalate), polydentate (three or more, e.g. hexadentate EDTA4−^{4-}). Di-/polydentate ligands are chelating ligands; ambidentate ligands (SCN−\text{SCN}^-, NO2−\text{NO}_2^-) can bind through either of two donor atoms.
  • Spectrochemical series: ligands rank from weak field (I−<Br−<Cl−<F−\text{I}^- < \text{Br}^- < \text{Cl}^- < \text{F}^-) to strong field (NH3<en<CN−≈CO\text{NH}_3 < \text{en} < \text{CN}^- \approx \text{CO}), by how strongly they split the metal's d-orbitals.
  • Coordination number: total donor atoms bonded to the metal — counted per donor atom, not per ligand (a bidentate ligand contributes 2).
  • Colour arises from dd-dd electronic transitions across the crystal-field gap Δo\Delta_o; d0d^0 (Sc3+\text{Sc}^{3+}) and d10d^{10} (Zn2+\text{Zn}^{2+}) ions are colourless (no possible transition).
  • Magnetic properties: whether a d4d^4-d7d^7 complex is paramagnetic (high-spin) or diamagnetic/less-paramagnetic (low-spin) depends on comparing Δo\Delta_o against the pairing energy PP; e.g. weak-field [CoF6]3−[\text{CoF}_6]^{3-} (4 unpaired) versus strong-field [Co(NH3)6]3+[\text{Co}(\text{NH}_3)_6]^{3+} (0 unpaired).
  • Shapes: coordination number 2 = linear, 6 = octahedral (almost always); coordination number 4 = tetrahedral (weak field / sp3sp^3) or square planar (strong field, d8d^8, dsp2dsp^2), e.g. [NiCl4]2−[\text{NiCl}_4]^{2-} vs [Ni(CN)4]2−[\text{Ni}(\text{CN})_4]^{2-}.
  • IUPAC nomenclature: cation before anion; ligands alphabetical before metal; anionic ligands end "-o" (chloro, cyano); special names aqua, ammine, carbonyl, nitrosyl; bis/tris/tetrakis for composite ligand names; metal oxidation state in Roman numerals; "-ate" ending for anionic complexes (ferrate, cuprate, argentate).
  • EAN rule: EAN=Z−x+2(CN)\text{EAN} = Z - x + 2(\text{CN}); many stable complexes reach the electron count of the next noble gas (e.g. 36, matching krypton, for [Fe(CN)6]4−[\text{Fe}(\text{CN})_6]^{4-}, [Co(NH3)6]3+[\text{Co}(\text{NH}_3)_6]^{3+}, [Ni(CO)4][\text{Ni}(\text{CO})_4]).
  • Werner's theory: a metal shows a primary valence (ionizable, matches oxidation state) and a secondary valence (non-ionizable, fixed, directional, matches coordination number) simultaneously — explains why CoCl3.6NH3\text{CoCl}_3.6\text{NH}_3, .5NH3.5\text{NH}_3, .4NH3.4\text{NH}_3 precipitate 3, 2, 1 mol AgCl\text{AgCl} respectively.
  • Valence bond theory: hybridization of metal orbitals fixes geometry and magnetism — d2sp3d^2sp^3 (inner orbital, low-spin) vs sp3d2sp^3d^2 (outer orbital, high-spin) for octahedral; dsp2dsp^2 (square planar) vs sp3sp^3 (tetrahedral) for 4-coordinate.
  • Crystal field theory: in an octahedral field, d-orbitals split into lower t2gt_{2g} (3 orbitals, −0.4Δo-0.4\Delta_o) and higher ege_g (2 orbitals, +0.6Δo+0.6\Delta_o); in a tetrahedral field the order reverses (lower ee, higher t2t_2) and Δt≈49Δo\Delta_t \approx \tfrac{4}{9}\Delta_o — always too small for low-spin, so tetrahedral complexes are always high-spin.
  • CFSE =(−0.4 nt2g+0.6 neg)Δo= (-0.4\,n_{t_{2g}} + 0.6\,n_{e_g})\Delta_o; high-spin vs low-spin for d4d^4-d7d^7 is decided by comparing Δo\Delta_o against pairing energy PP. …