Commerce · Ch 4 — Joint Hindu Family Business and Cooperative Society
Merits and Limitations of Joint Hindu Family Business
3
Merits and Limitations of Joint Hindu Family Business
Merits of Joint Hindu Family Business
- Continuity through survivorship. Since membership is by birth and not by agreement, the business is not automatically dissolved by the death, insanity, or insolvency of any single coparcener (unlike a partnership, which can be affected by such events among its partners) — the business simply continues under the next senior-most Karta.
- Secrecy. Since the Karta alone manages the business and is under no compulsion to disclose its affairs to outsiders, important business secrets can be maintained more easily than in a company, which must file and publish various returns.
- Prompt decision-making. Because the Karta has wide, largely unquestioned authority over ordinary business matters, decisions can be taken quickly, without needing to consult and secure the agreement of every coparcener, unlike a partnership where certain matters require unanimous consent.
- Limited liability for coparceners other than the Karta. Every ordinary coparcener's risk is capped at his or her share in the joint family property — a genuine advantage over an ordinary partnership, where every partner's personal liability is unlimited.
- Family loyalty and cooperation. Because the members are bound by kinship as well as by business interest, cooperation and trust between them tend to be stronger than among unrelated business partners, which can make for smoother day-to-day working.
- Sound credit standing. Since the entire joint family property (not just the Karta's individual assets) stands behind the business's debts, outsiders often extend credit to a well-established JHF business more readily than to a small sole proprietorship.
Limitations of Joint Hindu Family Business
- Limited capital. Since capital can only come from within the joint family's own resources, the scale of finance available to a JHF business is generally far smaller than what a company can raise from the public.
- Limited managerial ability. Since only the Karta manages the business, the quality of management depends entirely on the ability, honesty, and business sense of one person — the other coparceners cannot bring their own managerial talent to bear on the business's day-to-day running, unlike a partnership's multiple active partners.
- Unlimited liability of the Karta. While ordinary coparceners enjoy limited liability, the Karta's own personal liability for the business's debts is unlimited — a real personal risk concentrated on one individual.
- Scope for misuse of power. Because the Karta's authority is wide and largely unquestioned in day-to-day matters, there is genuine scope for a dishonest or careless Karta to mismanage the business or the family's property, with the other coparceners having little practical recourse short of demanding a partition. …