The velocity associated with a proton moving in a potential difference of 1000 V is $4.37 \times 10^{5}\ ms^{-1}$. If the hockey ball of mass 0.1 kg is moving with this velocity, calculate the wavelength associated with this velocity.

The velocity associated with a proton moving in a potential difference of 1000 V is 4.37 × 10⁵ms⁻¹. If the hoc

Exercises · 2.60

4.37 \times 10^{5}\ ms^{-1}

Yanam BieapTextbookSubjective· 2mImportance★★★★★

56% · 78/140 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — De Broglie Wavelength

De Broglie Wavelength: When Particles Start Acting Like Waves

Imagine you're holding a cricket ball. You know exactly where it is, and if you throw it, you can predict its path. That's a particle — localised, definite, following Newton's laws. Now think of light. You can't "hold" a beam of light; it spreads out, bends around corners, creates interference patterns. That's a wave — spread out, not localised.

For centuries, physics kept these two worlds separate. Particles were particles. Waves were waves. Never the twain shall meet.

Then came a young French physicist, Louis de Broglie, in 1924. He asked a question that seemed almost absurd: If light — which we thought was a wave — can behave like a particle (the photoelectric effect), then why can't a particle — say, an electron — behave like a wave?

That question turned physics upside down.

The Core Idea

De Broglie proposed that every moving particle has a wave associated with it. The wavelength of that wave depends on the particle's momentum. The faster or heavier the particle, the shorter the wavelength.

\lambda = \frac{h}{p} = \frac{h}{mv}

This is not a mathematical trick. It's a physical reality. An electron moving through a crystal actually behaves like a wave of this wavelength — it can diffract, interfere, and form patterns just like light does.

Why You Don't See It in Daily Life

Here's the crucial point: the de Broglie wavelength is incredibly tiny for everyday objects.

Take a cricket ball of mass 0.16 kg moving at 30 m/s. Its de Broglie wavelength is:

\lambda = \frac{6.626 \times 10^{-34}}{0.16 \times 30} \approx 1.38 \times 10^{-34} \ \text{m}

That's about a hundred trillion trillion times smaller than the nucleus of an atom. No experiment can detect such a wave — it's effectively zero for all practical purposes.

Now take an electron (mass $9.1 \times 10^{-31}$ kg) accelerated through 100 volts. Its speed is about $5.9 \times 10^6$ m/s. Its de Broglie wavelength:

\lambda = \frac{6.626 \times 10^{-34}}{9.1 \times 10^{-31} \times 5.9 \times 10^6} \approx 1.23 \times 10^{-10} \ \text{m}

That's about 0.12 nanometres — comparable to the spacing between atoms in a crystal. This is measurable. And indeed, in 1927, Davisson and Germer fired electrons at a nickel crystal and observed diffraction — the unmistakable signature of a wave.

Note

The de Broglie wavelength is only observable when it is comparable to the size of objects the particle interacts with. For macroscopic objects, it's far too small to matter. For subatomic particles, it's the key to understanding their behaviour.

What This Means Physically

The wave is not a physical wave in space like a water wave. It's a probability wave — its amplitude at any point tells you the probability of finding the particle there. Where the wave amplitude is large, you're likely to find the particle; where it's zero, you won't.

This wave-particle duality is not a compromise. It's the actual nature of reality. An electron is neither a pure particle nor a pure wave — it's something that shows particle-like behaviour in some experiments (like hitting a screen at a point) and wave-like behaviour in others (like passing through two slits and interfering with itself). …

Why this formula?

De Broglie Wavelength: Why the Formula Holds

Let's build this from the ground up — understanding why matter has a wavelength, not just memorizing $\lambda = \frac{h}{p}$ .

The Core Insight: Nature's Symmetry

Before de Broglie, physics had two separate worlds:

Light — showed wave behaviour (diffraction, interference) but also particle behaviour (photoelectric effect)
Matter — showed particle behaviour (momentum, collisions) but no wave behaviour yet

De Broglie asked a daring question in his 1924 PhD thesis:

If light (a wave) can behave like a particle, why can't a particle (like an electron) behave like a wave?

Nature should be symmetric — what applies to one should apply to the other.

Step 1: Start with Light (What We Already Knew)

For a photon, Einstein had given us two key relations:

Energy: $E = hf$ (Planck's relation)
Momentum: $p = \frac{h}{\lambda}$ (from $E = pc$ for light, combined with $c = f\lambda$ )

So for light:

\lambda = \frac{h}{p}

This was experimentally verified for photons.

Step 2: De Broglie's Bold Hypothesis

De Broglie said: This relation is not special to light. It is universal.

For any particle with momentum $p$ :

\boxed{\lambda = \frac{h}{p}}

Where:

$\lambda$ = de Broglie wavelength
$h$ = Planck's constant ( $6.626 \times 10^{-34} \text{ J·s}$ )
$p$ = momentum of the particle

Step 3: Why Momentum and Not Velocity?

This is crucial. The formula uses momentum ( $p = mv$ ), not just velocity.

For a non-relativistic particle (slow compared to light):

\lambda = \frac{h}{mv}

For a relativistic particle (like an electron at high speed):

p = \gamma mv \quad \text{where} \quad \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}

\lambda = \frac{h}{\gamma mv}

Why momentum? Because momentum is the more fundamental quantity — it's conserved, it's frame-independent in a deeper sense, and it connects directly to the wave's phase.

Step 4: The Deeper Reasoning — Wave-Particle Duality

De Broglie didn't just guess. He reasoned:

Every moving particle has an associated wave — called the "matter wave" or "pilot wave"
The frequency of this wave comes from energy: $f = \frac{E}{h}$
The wavelength comes from momentum: $\lambda = \frac{h}{p}$

These two relations are linked by the phase velocity of the wave:

v_{\text{phase}} = f\lambda = \frac{E}{h} \cdot \frac{h}{p} = \frac{E}{p}

For a free particle with kinetic energy $E = \frac{p^2}{2m}$ :

v_{\text{phase}} = \frac{p}{2m} = \frac{v}{2}

This is half the particle's speed — a strange but mathematically consistent result.

Step 5: Experimental Confirmation (Why We Believe It)

De Broglie's idea was confirmed when electrons showed wave behaviour: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

De Broglie's hypothesis extends wave-particle duality to all matter: a macroscopic hockey ball moving at $4.37 \times 10^5\ \text{m s}^{-1}$ has an associated wavelength of $\lambda = h/mv$ , which turns out to be $1.52 \times 10^{-38}\ \text{m}$ — utterly negligible and unobservable, explaining why we never see quantum effects in everyday objects.

Why does a hockey ball have a wavelength?

In 1924, Louis de Broglie proposed that if light (classically a wave) can behave like particles (photons), then particles should exhibit wave properties. He postulated that any moving object—electron, proton, or hockey ball—has an associated wavelength given by

\lambda = \frac{h}{p} = \frac{h}{mv}

where $h = 6.626 \times 10^{-34}\ \text{J s}$ is Planck's constant, $m$ is mass, and $v$ is velocity.

For subatomic particles like electrons and protons, this wavelength is comparable to atomic dimensions ( $\sim 10^{-10}\ \text{m}$ ), so wave behavior (diffraction, interference) is readily observed. For macroscopic objects, the wavelength becomes so fantastically small that quantum effects vanish—this is why cricket balls and cars obey classical mechanics.

Step-by-step calculation

We are given:

Mass of the hockey ball: $m = 0.1\ \text{kg}$
Velocity: $v = 4.37 \times 10^5\ \text{m s}^{-1}$ (the same velocity the proton acquired)
Planck's constant: $h = 6.626 \times 10^{-34}\ \text{J s}$

1. Write down the de Broglie relation

The wavelength associated with any particle of momentum $p = mv$ is

\lambda = \frac{h}{mv}

2. Substitute the known values

\lambda = \frac{6.626 \times 10^{-34}\ \text{J s}}{(0.1\ \text{kg})(4.37 \times 10^5\ \text{m s}^{-1})}

3. Compute the denominator (momentum)

mv = 0.1 \times 4.37 \times 10^5 = 4.37 \times 10^4\ \text{kg m s}^{-1}

4. Divide to find the wavelength

\lambda = \frac{6.626 \times 10^{-34}}{4.37 \times 10^4} = 1.516 \times 10^{-38}\ \text{m}

Rounding to three significant figures:

\lambda \approx 1.52 \times 10^{-38}\ \text{m}

--- …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous question · exercises2.59 — If the velocity of the electron in Bohr's first orbit is 2.19 × 10⁶ms⁻…→Next question · exercises2.61 — If the position of the electron is measured within an accuracy of ± 0.…

Q.The velocity associated with a proton moving in a potential difference of 1000 V is 4.37×105 ms−14.37 \times 10^{5}\ ms^{-1}4.37×105 ms−1. If the hockey ball of mass 0.1 kg is moving with this velocity, calculate the wavelength associated with this velocity.

Why does a hockey ball have a wavelength?

Step-by-step calculation

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.The velocity associated with a proton moving in a potential difference of 1000 V is $4.37 \times 10^{5}\ ms^{-1}$ . If the hockey ball of mass 0.1 kg is moving with this velocity, calculate the wavelength associated with this velocity.

Unlock everything free for 14 days