The Definition of Multiplication
When you multiply two complex numbers, you treat them like binomials in i, but with one crucial rule: i2=−1. This single substitution is what makes complex multiplication different from ordinary binomial multiplication.
Let z1=a+ib and z2=c+id be any two complex numbers. Their product z1z2 is defined as:
z1z2=(a+ib)(c+id)
Expand the product just as you would (a+x)(c+x):
=ac+iad+ibc+i2bd
Now apply i2=−1:
=ac+iad+ibc−bd
Group the real terms and the imaginary terms:
=(ac−bd)+i(ad+bc)
This is the fundamental formula for multiplying two complex numbers.
(a+ib)(c+id)=(ac−bd)+i(ad+bc)
Example: Multiply (3+i5) and (2+i6).
Here a=3, b=5, c=2, d=6.
Real part: ac−bd=3×2−5×6=6−30=−24
Imaginary part: ad+bc=3×6+5×2=18+10=28
So (3+i5)(2+i6)=−24+i28.
A common mistake is to forget the minus sign in the real part. The term −bd comes from i2bd=−bd, not +bd. Always write i2=−1 explicitly in your expansion until it becomes automatic.
Properties of Multiplication
Complex multiplication behaves in ways that are very familiar from real numbers. The textbook lists six properties, each stated without proof. Here we provide the complete reasoning for each.
(i) The Closure Law
Statement: The product of two complex numbers is always a complex number. For all complex numbers z1 and z2, z1z2 is a complex number.
Why it holds: If z1=a+ib and z2=c+id, then z1z2=(ac−bd)+i(ad+bc). Since a,b,c,d are real numbers, ac−bd and ad+bc are also real numbers. Therefore the result is of the form (real)+i(real), which is exactly the definition of a complex number. The product never "escapes" the set of complex numbers.
This property is not trivial — it tells us that complex numbers are closed under multiplication, just as integers are closed under addition. You will never get something like "infinity" or an undefined result from multiplying two complex numbers.
(ii) The Commutative Law
Statement: For any two complex numbers z1 and z2, z1z2=z2z1.
Proof: Let z1=a+ib and z2=c+id.
Compute z1z2:
z1z2=(ac−bd)+i(ad+bc)
Now compute z2z1:
z2z1=(c+id)(a+ib)=ca+icb+ida+i2db=(ca−db)+i(cb+da)
Since multiplication of real numbers is commutative (ca=ac, db=bd, cb=bc, da=ad), we have:
z2z1=(ac−bd)+i(ad+bc)
This is exactly the same as z1z2. Therefore z1z2=z2z1.
Because multiplication is commutative, you can multiply complex numbers in any order. This is useful when simplifying expressions — you can rearrange factors freely.
(iii) The Associative Law
Statement: For any three complex numbers z1,z2,z3, (z1z2)z3=z1(z2z3).
Proof: Let z1=a+ib, z2=c+id, z3=e+if.
First compute (z1z2)z3:
Step 1: z1z2=(ac−bd)+i(ad+bc). Call this p+iq where p=ac−bd and q=ad+bc.
Step 2: Multiply (p+iq) by z3=e+if:
(p+iq)(e+if)=(pe−qf)+i(pf+qe)
Substitute p and q:
=[(ac−bd)e−(ad+bc)f]+i[(ac−bd)f+(ad+bc)e]
=[ace−bde−adf−bcf]+i[acf−bdf+ade+bce]
Now compute z1(z2z3):
Step 1: z2z3=(c+id)(e+if)=(ce−df)+i(cf+de). Call this r+is where r=ce−df and s=cf+de.
Step 2: Multiply z1=a+ib by (r+is):
(a+ib)(r+is)=(ar−bs)+i(as+br)
Substitute r and s:
=[a(ce−df)−b(cf+de)]+i[a(cf+de)+b(ce−df)]
=[ace−adf−bcf−bde]+i[acf+ade+bce−bdf]
Compare the two results. The real parts are identical: both are ace−bde−adf−bcf. The imaginary parts are identical: both are acf−bdf+ade+bce. Therefore (z1z2)z3=z1(z2z3).
The algebra looks messy, but the key insight is that associativity follows from the associativity of real number multiplication and addition. The i2=−1 rule does not break this property.
(iv) The Multiplicative Identity
Statement: There exists a complex number 1+i0 (denoted simply as 1) such that for every complex number z, z⋅1=z. This number is called the multiplicative identity.
Proof: Let z=a+ib. Then:
z⋅1=(a+ib)(1+i0)
Using the multiplication formula with c=1, d=0:
=(a⋅1−b⋅0)+i(a⋅0+b⋅1)
=(a−0)+i(0+b)
=a+ib=z
So multiplying any complex number by 1 leaves it unchanged. The number 1+i0 behaves exactly like the real number 1 in multiplication.
The multiplicative identity is the complex number whose real part is 1 and imaginary part is 0. It is the same as the real number 1, but written in complex form.
(v) The Multiplicative Inverse
Statement: For every non-zero complex number z=a+ib (where at least one of a or b is non-zero), there exists a complex number called the multiplicative inverse of z, denoted by z1 or z−1, such that z⋅z1=1 (the multiplicative identity).
The multiplicative inverse is given by:
z1=a2+b2a+i(a2+b2−b)
Derivation: We want to find a complex number x+iy such that:
(a+ib)(x+iy)=1+i0
Expand the left side:
(ax−by)+i(ay+bx)=1+i0
For two complex numbers to be equal, their real parts must be equal and their imaginary parts must be equal. This gives us a system of two equations:
ax−by=1(1)
ay+bx=0(2)
From equation (2): ay=−bx, so y=−abx (provided a=0).
Substitute into equation (1):
ax−b(−abx)=1
ax+ab2x=1
x(a+ab2)=1
x(aa2+b2)=1
x=a2+b2a
Then y=−ab⋅a2+b2a=a2+b2−b.
Therefore:
z1=a2+b2a+i(a2+b2−b)
The multiplicative inverse exists only when z=0. If a=0 and b=0, then a2+b2=0 and the inverse would involve division by zero, which is undefined. Zero has no multiplicative inverse.
Verification: Multiply z by its inverse:
(a+ib)(a2+b2a−ia2+b2b)
Real part: a⋅a2+b2a−b⋅(−a2+b2b)=a2+b2a2+a2+b2b2=a2+b2a2+b2=1
Imaginary part: a⋅(−a2+b2b)+b⋅a2+b2a=−a2+b2ab+a2+b2ab=0
So the product is 1+i0=1, as required.
A quick way to find the multiplicative inverse: write z=a+ib, then z1=a2+b2a−ib. This is because (a+ib)(a−ib)=a2+b2 (a real number), so dividing both sides by a2+b2 gives the inverse. The number a−ib is called the complex conjugate of z, which you will study in detail later.
(vi) The Distributive Law …