Which of the following are used to convert RCHO into $RCH_2OH$? (Two or more than two options may be correct.) (i) $H_2/Pd$ (ii) $LiAlH_4$ (iii) $NaBH_4$ (iv) reaction with RMgX followed by hydrolysis

Which of the following are used to convert RCHO into RCH₂OH? (Two or more than two options may be correct.) (i

NCERT Exemplar · Q56

RCH_2OH

(i)

H_2/Pd

(ii)

LiAlH_4

(iii)

NaBH_4

(iv) reaction with RMgX followed by hydrolysis

Yanam BieapMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★

80% · 108/135 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Electrophilic Addition Reactions

Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution – The First Meeting

Imagine you have a benzene ring — that perfect, flat hexagon of six carbons with alternating double bonds. It's stable, almost stubbornly so. You want to attach something new to it, say a bromine atom or a nitro group. But benzene doesn't react like an alkene. It doesn't just add across a double bond. Instead, it does something more elegant: it kicks out a hydrogen and keeps its aromatic ring intact.

That's the heart of Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution (EAS).

The Intuition: Why "Substitution" and Not "Addition"?

Benzene's stability comes from its delocalised $\pi$ electrons — a cloud above and below the ring. This cloud is electron-rich, so it attracts electrophiles (electron-loving species). But if an electrophile simply added to a double bond, the ring would break its aromaticity, losing that huge stabilisation. That would be energetically costly.

So benzene does something smarter: it lets the electrophile attack, temporarily breaks aromaticity to form a high-energy intermediate (the arenium ion), and then loses a proton to restore the aromatic ring. The net result? A hydrogen is replaced by the electrophile. The ring is back to its stable, aromatic self.

Note

The key trade-off: temporary loss of aromaticity is acceptable because the final product regains it. Addition reactions would permanently destroy aromaticity — benzene avoids that.

The Precise Statement

Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution is a reaction in which an electrophile ( $E^+$ ) replaces a hydrogen atom on an aromatic ring, proceeding through a sigma complex (arenium ion) intermediate, and restoring aromaticity after deprotonation.

The general equation:

\ce{Ar-H + E+ -> Ar-E + H+}

where Ar represents an aromatic ring.

The Mechanism in Three Steps

Generation of the electrophile – Many EAS reactions need a catalyst to create a strong enough $E^+$ . For example, bromination uses $\ce{FeBr3}$ to polarise $\ce{Br2}$ into $\ce{Br^+}$ .
Attack by the aromatic ring – The $\pi$ electrons of benzene attack the electrophile, forming a sigma complex (also called the arenium ion or Wheland intermediate). This intermediate is non-aromatic — it has four $\pi$ electrons delocalised over five carbons, and one $sp^3$ carbon bearing the electrophile and a hydrogen.

\text{Benzene} + E^+ \longrightarrow \text{Sigma complex (non-aromatic)}

Deprotonation – A base (often the counterion of the catalyst, like $\ce{FeBr4-}$ ) removes the proton from the $sp^3$ carbon. The pair of electrons from the C–H bond flows back into the ring, restoring the aromatic sextet.

\text{Sigma complex} + \text{Base} \longrightarrow \text{Product} + \ce{H+}

Watch out

The sigma complex is not aromatic. It's a high-energy intermediate. Students often mistakenly think it's still aromatic — it isn't. That's why the step is fast and the complex is short-lived.

Why This Matters for Exams

EAS is the gateway to understanding how to put groups onto benzene rings. The rate-determining step is usually the formation of the sigma complex (step 2). The regiochemistry (where the electrophile goes) depends on whether the ring already has a substituent — that's the topic of activating/deactivating groups and ortho/para vs. meta directors. …

Why this formula?

Electrophilic Addition Reactions: Why the Mechanism Works

Electrophilic addition is a cornerstone of alkene and alkyne chemistry. Instead of memorising the "arrow pushing," let's understand why the reaction proceeds the way it does — driven by electron density, stability, and charge.

1. The Core Idea: Why Alkenes React This Way

Alkenes have a π-bond — a cloud of electrons above and below the plane of the σ-bond. This π-electron cloud is:

Electron-rich (nucleophilic)
Exposed (not shielded by σ-bonds like in alkanes)

An electrophile (electron-lover) is attracted to this high electron density. The reaction is electrophilic addition because the electrophile attacks first.

Key principle: The π-bond acts as a Lewis base (electron donor). The electrophile is a Lewis acid (electron acceptor).

2. The General Mechanism (Two-Step)

Step 1: Formation of a Carbocation (or Bridged Intermediate)

The electrophile (E⁺) attacks the π-bond. The π-electrons form a new σ-bond to E⁺, leaving the other carbon with a positive charge — a carbocation.

\ce{C=C} + \ce{E+} \longrightarrow \ce{C+-C-E}

Why does this happen?

The π-bond is weaker than a σ-bond (~260 kJ/mol vs ~350 kJ/mol). Breaking the π-bond to form a σ-bond is energetically favourable because the new σ-bond is stronger. The carbocation is a high-energy intermediate, but it's stabilised by:

Hyperconjugation (alkyl groups donate electron density)
Inductive effect (alkyl groups push electrons toward the positive carbon)

Step 2: Nucleophilic Attack

A nucleophile (Nu⁻) attacks the carbocation, forming a second σ-bond.

\ce{C+-C-E} + \ce{Nu-} \longrightarrow \ce{C-Nu-C-E}

Why does this happen?

The carbocation is electron-deficient (positive charge). The nucleophile is electron-rich. Opposite charges attract — this is electrostatic and orbital overlap driven.

3. The Key "Formula" — Markovnikov's Rule

Statement: In the addition of HX to an unsymmetrical alkene, the hydrogen attaches to the carbon with more hydrogens already, and the X attaches to the carbon with fewer hydrogens.

Why does this rule hold? (The reasoning)

Consider propene: $\ce{CH3-CH=CH2}$ + HBr.

Possible carbocations:
1. Primary carbocation: $\ce{CH3-CH+-CH2Br}$ (less stable)
2. Secondary carbocation: $\ce{CH3-CHBr-CH2+}$ (more stable)

The more substituted carbocation (secondary > primary) is more stable due to:

Hyperconjugation: More alkyl groups = more C–H σ-bonds that can donate electron density into the empty p-orbital of the carbocation.
Inductive effect: Alkyl groups are electron-donating, stabilising the positive charge.

Result: The reaction proceeds via the more stable carbocation, leading to Markovnikov addition.

Markovnikov's rule is not a law — it's a consequence of carbocation stability.

4. The "Anti-Markovnikov" Exception (Why It Happens)

With HBr in the presence of peroxides (ROOR), the addition is anti-Markovnikov — Br goes to the less substituted carbon.

Why? The mechanism changes from ionic to free-radical.

Peroxide decomposes to radicals: $\ce{ROOR -> 2 RO•}$
RO• abstracts H from HBr: $\ce{RO• + HBr -> ROH + Br•}$
Br• adds to the alkene — at the less substituted carbon (because the radical formed is more stable — tertiary > secondary > primary).
The new radical abstracts H from another HBr, regenerating Br•. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Aldehydes are reduced to primary alcohols by catalytic hydrogenation (H2/Ni, Pt or Pd) and by hydride donors such as LiAlH4 and NaBH4. A Grignard reagent instead adds a new alkyl group across the carbonyl, giving a secondary alcohol, not RCH2OH. The correct options are (i), (ii) and (iii).

Concept

RCHO -> RCH2OH is a straightforward reduction of the carbonyl group -- it needs either a hydride source (which adds H- to carbon, then a proton to oxygen on work-up) or gaseous H2 over a metal hydrogenation catalyst.

Checking each reagent

Option (i), H2/Pd: catalytic hydrogenation over Pd (or Pt, Ni) adds H2 across the C=O bond exactly as it does across C=C, giving RCH2OH directly. This is a standard NCERT-taught method for reducing aldehydes and ketones to alcohols. Correct.
Option (ii), LiAlH4: a strong hydride donor; delivers H- to the carbonyl carbon, and aqueous work-up protonates the alkoxide to RCH2OH. Correct. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Method: Reduction of Aldehydes to Primary Alcohols

This is a reduction reaction — we are adding hydrogen ( $H_2$ ) to the carbonyl group ( $C=O$ ) to convert it into an alcohol ( $-CH_2OH$ ).

Key Concept

RCHO (aldehyde) → RCH₂OH (primary alcohol)
The carbonyl carbon goes from sp² to sp³ hybridisation
Two hydrogen atoms are added across the $C=O$ double bond

Step-by-Step Analysis

Step 1: Identify the functional group change

Aldehyde ( $-CHO$ ) → Primary alcohol ( $-CH_2OH$ )
This requires reduction (gain of hydrogen / loss of oxygen)

Step 2: Check each reagent

Reagent	Reduces aldehyde?	Reason
(A) $H_2/Pd$	✓ Yes	Catalytic hydrogenation reduces $C=O$ to $CH_2OH$
(B) $LiAlH_4$	✓ Yes	Strong reducing agent; reduces aldehydes to primary alcohols
(C) $NaBH_4$	✓ Yes	Mild reducing agent; selectively reduces aldehydes and ketones

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The Correct Answer

The question asks: convert RCHO (an aldehyde) into RCH₂OH (a primary alcohol).

Option (B) LiAlH₄ — Yes. A strong reducing agent that reduces aldehydes to primary alcohols.
Option (C) NaBH₄ — Yes. A milder reducing agent that also reduces aldehydes to primary alcohols.
Option (A) H₂/Pd — Yes. Catalytic hydrogenation reduces aldehydes to primary alcohols.
Option (D) RMgX + hydrolysis — No. This is a Grignard reaction, which adds an alkyl group to the carbonyl carbon, giving a secondary alcohol (not RCH₂OH).

Correct options: (A), (B), (C)

Common Mistakes Students Make

1. Thinking NaBH₄ cannot reduce aldehydes

Mistake: Some students think NaBH₄ only works on ketones or is too weak.
Truth: NaBH₄ reduces both aldehydes and ketones to alcohols. It is selective — it does not reduce esters, acids, or nitro groups.
Avoid: Remember: NaBH₄ reduces aldehydes → primary alcohols, ketones → secondary alcohols.

2. Forgetting that H₂/Pd works here

Mistake: Students often think catalytic hydrogenation only reduces alkenes/alkynes.
Truth: H₂/Pd also reduces aldehydes to primary alcohols (though it is less common in exams).
Avoid: Know that H₂/metal catalyst reduces C=O in aldehydes and ketones, but not in carboxylic acids or esters under normal conditions.

3. Confusing Grignard with reduction

Mistake: Students see “RMgX + hydrolysis” and think it gives an alcohol — which is true — but they forget it adds a carbon.
Truth: Grignard reagent adds an alkyl group to the carbonyl carbon. For an aldehyde RCHO, the product is R–CH(OH)–R' (secondary alcohol), not RCH₂OH.
Avoid: Always check: does the reagent add a carbon or just add H₂? If it adds carbon, the product changes.

4. Not reading “Two or more than two options may be correct”

Mistake: Students pick only one option (often LiAlH₄) and miss others.
Truth: The question explicitly allows multiple correct answers. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ55 — Explain a process in which a biocatalyst is used in the industrial pre…→Next questionQ57 — Which of the following reaction schemes will yield phenol? (Two or mor…

Q.Which of the following are used to convert RCHO into RCH2OHRCH_2OHRCH2​OH? (Two or more than two options may be correct.)

Concept

Checking each reagent

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.Which of the following are used to convert RCHO into $RCH_2OH$ ? (Two or more than two options may be correct.)

Unlock everything free for 14 days