The mass of a H-atom is less than the sum of the masses of a proton and electron. Why is this?

NCERT Exemplar · Q8

Q. The mass of a H-atom is less than the sum of the masses of a proton and electron. Why is this?

Yanam BieapShort· 2mImportance★★★★★

57% · 29/51 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Bohr Model Energy Levels

The Intuition: Why Can't an Electron Just Sit Anywhere?

Imagine you're rolling a marble on a staircase. The marble can rest on any step — step 1, step 2, step 3 — but it can never float halfway between two steps. The staircase forces the marble into specific, fixed positions.

That's the core idea of the Bohr model. Before Bohr, physicists thought electrons orbited the nucleus like planets around the sun — they could be at any distance, any energy. But experiments showed something strange: atoms only emit or absorb light at very specific colours (wavelengths), not a continuous rainbow. That meant electrons could only have certain, fixed energies — like the steps of a staircase.

Bohr's genius was to say: an electron in an atom cannot have any arbitrary energy. It can only occupy certain "allowed" energy levels. When it jumps from one level to another, it either absorbs or emits a photon of light whose energy exactly matches the difference between those levels.

The Precise Statement

In the Bohr model of the hydrogen atom (and hydrogen-like ions with one electron), the electron moves in circular orbits around the nucleus. But only those orbits are allowed where the electron's angular momentum is an integer multiple of $\frac{h}{2\pi}$ (where $h$ is Planck's constant).

This quantisation condition leads to a simple formula for the energy of the electron in the $n$ -th orbit:

E_n = -\frac{13.6 \text{ eV}}{n^2}

Here:

$n$ is the principal quantum number — a positive integer ( $n = 1, 2, 3, \dots$ )
$E_n$ is the energy of the electron in that level (in electronvolts)
The negative sign means the electron is bound to the nucleus — you need to add energy to free it

The lowest energy state ( $n=1$ ) is called the ground state. Its energy is $-13.6 \text{ eV}$ . The higher states ( $n=2, 3, 4, \dots$ ) are excited states — they have less negative (higher) energies.

Note

As $n$ increases, the energy levels get closer together. At $n = \infty$ , the energy becomes $0 \text{ eV}$ — the electron is completely free from the atom (ionisation).

What This Explains

When an electron jumps from a higher level ( $n_i$ ) to a lower level ( $n_f$ ), it emits a photon of energy:

\Delta E = E_{n_f} - E_{n_i} = 13.6 \left( \frac{1}{n_f^2} - \frac{1}{n_i^2} \right) \text{ eV}

This single formula predicts all the spectral lines of hydrogen — the Lyman series (jumps to $n=1$ ), Balmer series (to $n=2$ ), Paschen series (to $n=3$ ), and so on. Each series corresponds to a different "final step" on the staircase. …

Why this formula?

Why the Bohr Model Gives Those Energy Levels

The Bohr model is a beautiful piece of physics because it takes a simple, almost desperate idea — "electrons only exist in certain orbits" — and derives the entire hydrogen spectrum from it. The key is that Bohr didn't just assume the energy levels; he forced them to be consistent with classical physics in one specific way, then broke with it in another.

The Two Non-Negotiable Pieces

First, the electron moves in a circle around the proton. That's pure classical mechanics: the Coulomb attraction provides the centripetal force.

\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{e^2}{r^2} = \frac{mv^2}{r}

This gives you a relation between speed $v$ and radius $r$ :

v^2 = \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 m r}

Second, the total energy of the electron is the sum of its kinetic and potential energies. Potential energy for a Coulomb force is $-\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{e^2}{r}$ (negative because the force is attractive, and we set zero at infinity).

E = \frac12 mv^2 - \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{e^2}{r}

Substitute $v^2$ from above:

E = \frac12 \left( \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} \right) - \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}

So far, nothing is quantised. Any radius $r$ gives a valid classical orbit, and the energy just follows from that radius. The problem is that a classical electron in a curved path radiates energy and spirals into the nucleus — atoms should collapse. Bohr needed a rule to pick out stable orbits.

The Quantisation Condition

Bohr's revolutionary step was to postulate that the angular momentum of the electron is quantised in units of $\hbar = h/2\pi$ :

m v r = n \hbar, \quad n = 1, 2, 3, \dots

Why this particular rule? Bohr later said it was the simplest way to get the right answer. But there's a deeper physical motivation: if you think of the electron as a wave (de Broglie's idea, which came a decade later), the condition that a standing wave fits exactly around the circumference $2\pi r = n \lambda$ gives $m v r = n \hbar$ directly. So the quantisation condition is really a wave condition imposed on a particle picture.

Note

The angular momentum quantisation is the only non-classical assumption in the Bohr model. Everything else follows from classical mechanics and electromagnetism.

Deriving the Allowed Radii and Energies

From $m v r = n \hbar$ , we get $v = n\hbar / (mr)$ . Substitute this into the centripetal force equation:

\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{e^2}{r^2} = \frac{m}{r} \left( \frac{n\hbar}{mr} \right)^2 = \frac{n^2 \hbar^2}{m r^3}

Solve for $r$ :

r_n = \frac{4\pi\varepsilon_0 \hbar^2}{m e^2} \, n^2

The constant in front is the Bohr radius $a_0 \approx 0.529 \, \text{Å}$ . So the radii are $r_n = a_0 n^2$ .

Now plug $r_n$ back into the energy expression $E = -\frac12 \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}$ :

E_n = -\frac12 \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \cdot \frac{1}{a_0 n^2} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 a_0} \cdot \frac{1}{n^2}

Substitute $a_0 = \frac{4\pi\varepsilon_0 \hbar^2}{m e^2}$ :

E_n = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \cdot \frac{m e^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 \hbar^2} \cdot \frac{1}{n^2} = -\frac{m e^4}{8 \varepsilon_0^2 h^2} \cdot \frac{1}{n^2}

E_n = -\frac{13.6 \text{ eV}}{n^2}

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The mass of a hydrogen atom is less than the sum of its parts because the binding energy that holds the electron and proton together is released as radiation, and this lost energy corresponds to a loss of mass via $E=mc^2$ .

This is a beautiful question that gets at the heart of why nuclear reactions release so much energy — and why mass isn’t conserved in the way we usually think.

The core idea: mass is frozen energy

In everyday chemistry, we treat mass as a fixed property. But Einstein’s special relativity tells us that mass and energy are two sides of the same coin: $E = mc^2$ . Energy has mass, and mass is a form of energy. When a system loses energy, it loses mass.

When a proton and an electron come together to form a hydrogen atom, they don’t just sit next to each other. They bind — the electron is captured into an orbit around the proton. To do this, the electron must shed some of its kinetic energy. That excess energy is emitted as a photon (light). That photon carries energy away from the atom.

Since energy has mass, the atom that remains has less energy — and therefore less mass — than the sum of the original proton and electron.

E_{\text{binding}} = \Delta m \, c^2

Where $\Delta m$ is the mass defect — the difference between the sum of the separate masses and the mass of the bound atom.

Step-by-step reasoning

Start with the separate particles. A free proton and a free electron each have their own rest masses. Their total mass is simply $m_p + m_e$ .
Bring them together to form an atom. The electron is attracted to the proton by the Coulomb force. As it falls toward the proton, it gains kinetic energy. To settle into a stable orbit (the ground state of hydrogen), it must get rid of this extra energy. It does so by emitting a photon.
The emitted photon carries energy away. That photon’s energy is exactly the binding energy of the hydrogen atom — about 13.6 eV for the ground state. This energy leaves the system entirely.
Apply $E=mc^2$ to the system. The atom that remains has lost that 13.6 eV of energy compared to the separated particles. Since mass and energy are equivalent, the atom’s mass is lower by $\Delta m = E/c^2$ .
Calculate the mass defect. Let’s put numbers to it:
- Binding energy of hydrogen: $E_b = 13.6 \, \text{eV}$
- Convert to joules: $13.6 \, \text{eV} \times 1.602 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{J/eV} = 2.18 \times 10^{-18} \, \text{J}$
- Mass equivalent: $\Delta m = \frac{2.18 \times 10^{-18}}{(3 \times 10^8)^2} \approx 2.42 \times 10^{-35} \, \text{kg}$
This is an incredibly tiny mass — about 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000242 kg. That’s why we don’t notice it in everyday chemistry. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

←Previous questionQ7 — A set of atoms in an excited state decays. (a) in general to any of th…→Next questionQ9 — Imagine removing one electron from He⁴ and He³. Their energy levels, a…

Q.The mass of a H-atom is less than the sum of the masses of a proton and electron. Why is this?

Concept understanding — Bohr Model Energy Levels

The Intuition: Why Can't an Electron Just Sit Anywhere?

The Precise Statement

What This Explains

Why this formula?

Why the Bohr Model Gives Those Energy Levels

The Two Non-Negotiable Pieces

The Quantisation Condition

Deriving the Allowed Radii and Energies

The core idea: mass is frozen energy

Step-by-step reasoning

Method: The Mass-Energy Accounting Method for Any Bound System

Steps

Q.The mass of a H-atom is less than the sum of the masses of a proton and electron. Why is this?

The core idea: mass is frozen energy

Step-by-step reasoning

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days