Q.A paramagnetic sample shows a net magnetisation of when placed in an external magnetic field of at a temperature of . When the same sample is placed in an external magnetic field of at a temperature of , the magnetisation will be
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Using Curie’s law for paramagnetism, magnetisation is proportional to . The new magnetisation is .
The key to this problem is recognising that paramagnetic materials obey Curie’s law under the conditions given. Curie’s law states that the magnetisation of a paramagnetic sample is directly proportional to the applied magnetic field and inversely proportional to the absolute temperature :
Why does this make sense physically? In a paramagnet, each atom has a tiny magnetic moment. Without an external field, thermal agitation keeps these moments randomly oriented — no net magnetisation. When you apply a field, it tries to align the moments, but temperature works against it, jumbling them up. So a stronger field gives more alignment (higher ), while a higher temperature gives less alignment (lower ). The ratio captures this competition neatly.
Now, the problem gives us two different situations for the same sample. Since the material and its properties (like the number of atoms per volume) don’t change, the constant of proportionality in Curie’s law stays the same. That means we can write:
or more simply:
Let’s work through the numbers step by step.
-
List what we know.
First case: , , .
Second case: , , and is what we need.
-
Set up the proportion.
From Curie’s law: , so for the same sample:
This is valid because the proportionality constant cancels out.
- Plug in the numbers.
Simplify each fraction inside:
…
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.