Skip to content
Activity · Q2

Q.A customer has filed a suit against a trader who has supplied poor quality goods to him. It is known that the court judgment will be in favour of the customer and the trader will be required to pay the damages. However, the amount of legal damages is not known with certainty. The accounting year has already been ended and the books are now finalised to ascertain true profit or loss. The accountant of the trader has advised him not to consider the expected loss on account of payment of legal damages because the amount is not certain and the final judgment of the court is not yet out. Do you think the accountant is right in his approach?

Yanam CbseNCERTSubjectiveImportance★★★★★est
33% · 5/15 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The accountant is wrong. The Conservatism (Prudence) concept says: do not anticipate profits, but provide for all possible losses. As the judgment is known to favour the customer, the damages are a probable loss and must be estimated and provided for, even though the exact amount is not yet certain.

The concept in play — Conservatism (Prudence)

Conservatism directs an accountant, when faced with uncertainty, to play safe: unrealised gains are ignored, but all foreseeable losses — even those that are only anticipated — are recorded at once. The purpose is to ensure that profits and assets are never overstated, so the statements give a cautious, dependable picture.

Applying it here …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.