Skip to content
Miscellaneous Exercise · Q5

Q.Show that if A ⊂ B, then C – B ⊂ C – A.

Yanam CbseNCERTSubjective· 3mImportance★★★★★est
52% · 69/132 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

When AA is contained in BB, removing the larger set BB from CC leaves fewer elements than removing the smaller set AA; hence C−B⊆C−AC - B \subseteq C - A.

The set difference C−AC - A consists of all elements that belong to CC but not to AA. The claim asks us to show that if AA is a subset of BB, then removing BB from CC cannot give us more elements than removing AA from CC.

The intuition is straightforward: if A⊆BA \subseteq B, then BB contains everything AA does, possibly more. When we subtract BB from CC, we're throwing away at least as much as we would by subtracting AA. So C−BC - B should be "smaller" (contained in) C−AC - A.

Let's prove this by showing that every element of C−BC - B must also belong to C−AC - A.

  1. Take an arbitrary element of C−BC - B.

    Let x∈C−Bx \in C - B. By the definition of set difference, this means x∈Cx \in C and x∉Bx \notin B.

  2. Use the hypothesis A⊆BA \subseteq B.

    Since A⊆BA \subseteq B, every element of AA is also in BB. The contrapositive of this statement is equally useful: if an element is not in BB, then it cannot be in AA either. Formally, x∉B  ⟹  x∉Ax \notin B \implies x \notin A.

  3. Conclude that x∈C−Ax \in C - A.

    We know x∈Cx \in C (from step 1) and x∉Ax \notin A (from step 2). Therefore, by definition, x∈C−Ax \in C - A.

  4. Generalize. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.