Skip to content
NCERT Exemplar · Q2

Q.Two batteries of emf ε1\varepsilon_1 and ε2\varepsilon_2 (with ε2>ε1\varepsilon_2 > \varepsilon_1) and internal resistances r1r_1 and r2r_2 respectively are connected in parallel between two common terminals AA and BB: one branch is the first battery ε1\varepsilon_1 in series with r1r_1, and the other branch is the second battery ε2\varepsilon_2 in series with r2r_2, both branches joining the same two terminals AA and BB with their positive terminals on the same side. Which of the following statements about the equivalent emf εeq\varepsilon_{eq} of this combination is correct?

(a) The equivalent emf εeq\varepsilon_{eq} of the two cells lies between ε1\varepsilon_1 and ε2\varepsilon_2, i.e. ε1<εeq<ε2\varepsilon_1 < \varepsilon_{eq} < \varepsilon_2.
(b) The equivalent emf εeq\varepsilon_{eq} is smaller than ε1\varepsilon_1.
(c) The equivalent emf is given by εeq=ε1+ε2\varepsilon_{eq} = \varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_2 always.
(d) εeq\varepsilon_{eq} is independent of the internal resistances r1r_1 and r2r_2.
Yanam CbseMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
43% · 18/42 Questions
✓ Free question

When two cells are connected in parallel, the combination behaves like a single cell whose emf is a weighted average of the two individual emfs (weighted by their conductances). A weighted average always lies between the two values, so with ε2>ε1\varepsilon_2 > \varepsilon_1 we have ε1<εeq<ε2\varepsilon_1 < \varepsilon_{eq} < \varepsilon_2.

Concept

Two cells in parallel can be replaced by one equivalent cell of emf εeq\varepsilon_{eq} and internal resistance reqr_{eq}. Applying Kirchhoff's rules (or the equivalent-source / Millman result) to the two branches between AA and BB:

εeq=ε1r1+ε2r21r1+1r2=ε1r2+ε2r1r1+r2,req=r1r2r1+r2.\varepsilon_{eq} = \frac{\dfrac{\varepsilon_1}{r_1} + \dfrac{\varepsilon_2}{r_2}}{\dfrac{1}{r_1} + \dfrac{1}{r_2}} = \frac{\varepsilon_1 r_2 + \varepsilon_2 r_1}{r_1 + r_2}, \qquad r_{eq} = \frac{r_1 r_2}{r_1 + r_2}.

Why this is a weighted average

Write εeq=w1ε1+w2ε2\varepsilon_{eq} = w_1\varepsilon_1 + w_2\varepsilon_2 with w1=r2r1+r2w_1 = \dfrac{r_2}{r_1+r_2} and w2=r1r1+r2w_2 = \dfrac{r_1}{r_1+r_2}. Both weights are positive and w1+w2=1w_1 + w_2 = 1, so εeq\varepsilon_{eq} must lie strictly between the smaller and larger emf. Hence ε1<εeq<ε2\varepsilon_1 < \varepsilon_{eq} < \varepsilon_2.

Why the other options fail

  • (B) εeq<ε1\varepsilon_{eq} < \varepsilon_1: impossible — a weighted average cannot be below the smallest input.
  • (C) εeq=ε1+ε2\varepsilon_{eq} = \varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_2: this is the result for cells in series aiding, not parallel.
  • (D) independent of r1,r2r_1, r_2: false — the formula for εeq\varepsilon_{eq} explicitly contains r1r_1 and r2r_2.
✓Final answer

Option (A): The equivalent emf lies between the two individual emfs, ε1<εeq<ε2\varepsilon_1 < \varepsilon_{eq} < \varepsilon_2.

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.