Which of the following cannot be valid assignment of probabilities for outcomes of sample space S={ω1,ω2,ω3,ω4,ω5,ω6,ω7}.
| Assignment | ω1 | ω2 | ω3 | ω4 | ω5 | ω6 | ω7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| (b) | 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 | 71 |
| (c) | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| (d) | −0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | −0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
| (e) | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 1415 |
Concept understanding — Probability Axioms
Probability Axioms: From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're rolling a fair six-sided die. Before you throw it, you know a few things for certain: the result will be one of the numbers 1 through 6. You also know that some outcomes are equally likely — each face has a 1-in-6 chance. And you know that the chance of getting either a 1 or a 2 is simply the sum of their individual chances: 61+61=31.
These three ideas — that probabilities are numbers between 0 and 1, that something must happen (total probability = 1), and that probabilities of non-overlapping events add — are the bedrock of all probability theory. They are so fundamental that we call them axioms: self-evident truths from which everything else is derived.
The Three Axioms (Kolmogorov's Axioms)
Let’s make this precise. We have a sample space S — the set of all possible outcomes. An event A is any subset of S (like "rolling an even number" = {2,4,6}). The probability of an event A is written P(A).
P(A)≥0for every event A
Axiom 1 (Non-negativity): A probability can never be negative. This matches our intuition: you can't have a "less than zero" chance of something happening. The smallest possible probability is 0 (an impossible event).
P(S)=1
Axiom 2 (Normalization): The probability that some outcome in the sample space occurs is exactly 1. Something must happen. This is why we say "the die will show 1,2,3,4,5, or 6" with certainty.
If A and B are mutually exclusive (they cannot happen together, i.e., A∩B=∅), then:
P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B)
Axiom 3 (Additivity): For events that don't overlap, the probability of "A or B" is just the sum of their individual probabilities. This is why the chance of rolling a 1 or a 2 is 61+61.
This additivity only works for mutually exclusive events. If events can happen together (like "rolling an even number" and "rolling a number greater than 3"), you cannot simply add their probabilities — you'd double-count the overlap.
Why These Three Are Enough
From these three simple rules, we can derive everything else in probability. For example:
-
Complement rule: P(not A)=1−P(A). Why? Because A and "not A" are mutually exclusive and together cover the whole sample space. By Axiom 3: P(A)+P(not A)=P(S)=1.
-
Probability of an impossible event: P(∅)=0. Since S and ∅ are mutually exclusive and S∪∅=S, we get P(S)+P(∅)=P(S), so P(∅)=0.
-
General addition rule (for any two events): P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B)−P(A∩B). This corrects for the double-counting when events overlap.
The axioms don't tell you what number to assign to a specific event — that depends on the problem (fair die, biased coin, etc.). They only tell you the rules that any valid assignment must follow.
A Quick Check
Suppose someone claims: "The probability of rain tomorrow is 0.6, and the probability of no rain is 0.5." Is this possible? No — because rain and no rain are mutually exclusive and cover all possibilities, so their probabilities must sum to 1. Here 0.6+0.5=1.1, violating Axiom 2. The axioms act as a reality check for any probability assignment.
The big idea: Probability axioms are the grammar of chance. They don't tell you what to say, but they tell you how to say it correctly.
Probability Axioms form the theoretical foundation of the NCERT Class 11 and Class 12 Mathematics chapters on Probability, matching searches like "axioms of probability: definition and examples" or "probability important questions class 11 class 12 maths". Kolmogorov's three rules underpin every later probability formula tested in CBSE boards, JEE Main, and other competitive exams, making them worth understanding rather than just memorising.
Concept: Probability Axioms — For a valid probability assignment, each probability must be between 0 and 1 (inclusive), and the sum of all probabilities must equal 1.
Step 1: Check non-negativity.
Assignments (c) and (d) contain values > 1 or negative values, violating the first axiom.
Step 2: Check sum = 1.
- (a): 0.1+0.01+0.05+0.03+0.01+0.2+0.6=1.00 — valid.
- (b): 7×71=1 — valid.
- (c): 0.1+0.2+0.3+0.4+0.5+0.6+0.7=2.8 — invalid.
- (d): Negative values alone make it invalid.
- (e): Sum = 141+2+3+4+5+6+15=1436=718>1 — invalid.
Step 3: Identify all invalid assignments.
(c), (d), and (e) each violate at least one axiom.
The assignments that cannot be valid are (c), (d), and (e).
A valid probability assignment must satisfy two axioms: each probability is between 0 and 1, and the sum of all probabilities equals 1. Assignments (c), (d), and (e) violate one or both of these rules.
The question asks which of the given assignments cannot be a valid probability distribution over the seven outcomes. This is a direct application of the Kolmogorov probability axioms — the two that matter here are:
- Non-negativity: For every outcome ωi, P(ωi)≥0.
- Normalization: The sum of probabilities over the entire sample space equals 1: ∑i=17P(ωi)=1.
A third axiom (countable additivity) is automatically satisfied for a finite sample space if the sum condition holds. So we simply check each assignment against these two rules.
Let’s go through them one by one.
-
Assignment (a): 0.1,0.01,0.05,0.03,0.01,0.2,0.6
All values are non-negative. Sum:
0.1+0.01=0.11
+0.05=0.16
+0.03=0.19
+0.01=0.20
+0.2=0.40
+0.6=1.00
Sum is exactly 1. So (a) is valid.
-
Assignment (b): 71 each
All are positive. Sum = 7×71=1. Valid.
-
Assignment (c): 0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7
All non-negative. Sum: 0.1+0.2=0.3, +0.3=0.6, +0.4=1.0, +0.5=1.5, +0.6=2.1, +0.7=2.8.
The sum is 2.8, far greater than 1. This violates normalization. So (c) is invalid.
-
Assignment (d): −0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,−0.2,0.1,0.3
Here ω1 has probability −0.1 and ω5 has −0.2 — both negative. This violates non-negativity. Even if we ignore that, the sum:
(−0.1)+0.2=0.1, +0.3=0.4, +0.4=0.8, +(−0.2)=0.6, +0.1=0.7, +0.3=1.0 — the sum happens to be 1, but the negative entries alone make it invalid. So (d) is invalid.
-
Assignment (e): 141,142,143,144,145,146,1415
All are non-negative. Sum: numerator sum = 1+2+3+4+5+6+15=36, so total = 1436=718≈2.571, which is not 1. Also note that 1415>1, which is not allowed either — a probability cannot exceed 1. So (e) is invalid on two counts.
A common mistake is to only check the sum and forget that each individual probability must lie in [0,1]. Assignment (d) passes the sum test but fails the non-negativity test. Also, a probability greater than 1 (like 1415 in (e)) is automatically invalid.
When checking quickly, first scan for negative numbers or values > 1 — that instantly eliminates some options. Then sum the rest. Here, (c) and (e) fail the sum test, (d) fails the non-negativity test.
Thus, the assignments that cannot be valid are (c), (d), and (e).
The assignments that cannot be valid are (c), (d), and (e).
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.A random variable X takes values 0,1,2,3 and its mean is 1.3. If P(X=3)=2P(X=1) and P(X=2)=0.3 then P(X=0)= (A) 51 (B) 52 (C) 53 (D) 54
›Reveal solutionSolution
Two linear equations (normalization and the mean) in the two unknowns P(X=0) and P(X=1) solve directly to give P(X=0)=2/5.
Concept and Intuition
A discrete random variable's full probability distribution must sum to 1, and its mean is the weighted sum ∑xiP(X=xi). With two of the four probabilities related (P(X=3)=2P(X=1)) and one given numerically (P(X=2)=0.3), we get exactly two equations for the two remaining unknowns.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let P(X=0)=p0, P(X=1)=p1. Then P(X=2)=0.3, P(X=3)=2p1.
- Normalization: p0+p1+0.3+2p1=1⇒p0+3p1=0.7.
- Mean: 0⋅p0+1⋅p1+2(0.3)+3(2p1)=1.3⇒p1+0.6+6p1=1.3⇒7p1=0.7⇒p1=0.1.
- Substitute back: p0=0.7−3(0.1)=0.7−0.3=0.4=52.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting that the mean equation also needs the P(X=2) term included with weight 2.
- Solving for p0 before finding p1 unnecessarily — solve the mean equation for p1 first.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 52.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.If the probability distribution of a random variable X is as follows, then P(x≤2)=
xi 0 1 2 3 4 P(X=xi) 3k 5k 3k2 4k2+k 3k2 (A) 2514 (B) 3223 (C) 4941 (D) 10083 ›Reveal solutionSolution
Solve for k using ∑P(X=xi)=1, then sum the first three probabilities for P(X≤2). Answer: 10083.
Concept and Intuition
A probability distribution's values must sum to exactly 1. This gives an equation in k that we solve, keeping only the root that yields non-negative probabilities. Then P(X≤2) is simply the sum of the probabilities at x=0,1,2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Sum all probabilities and set equal to 1:
3k+5k+3k2+(4k2+k)+3k2=1
10k2+9k=1⟹10k2+9k−1=0
- Solve the quadratic using the formula:
k=20−9±81+40=20−9±11
So k=202=101 or k=20−20=−1.
3. Reject k=−1 (gives negative probabilities); take k=0.1.
4. Verify all probabilities are valid: P(0)=0.3, P(1)=0.5, P(2)=0.03, P(3)=0.14, P(4)=0.03; sum =1.0. ✓
5. Compute:
P(X≤2)=P(0)+P(1)+P(2)=0.3+0.5+0.03=0.83=10083
Common Mistakes
- Accepting the extraneous negative root k=−1.
- Forgetting to include P(X=2)=3k2 (only summing P(0)+P(1)).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 10083.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.If the probability distribution of a random variable X is as follows, then k=
X = x 1 2 3 4 P(X = x) 2k 4k 3k k (A) 101 (B) 102 (C) 103 (D) 104 ›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests the basic normalization condition for a discrete probability distribution — all probabilities must add to 1. Answer: k=101.
Concept and Intuition
A probability distribution assigns a probability P(X=x) to every possible outcome, and since the outcomes are exhaustive and mutually exclusive, the total probability must be exactly 1. This single normalization equation is usually enough to pin down an unknown constant like k.
Step-by-Step Solution
- List the probabilities: P(X=1)=2k, P(X=2)=4k, P(X=3)=3k, P(X=4)=k.
- Sum them and set equal to 1: 2k+4k+3k+k=10k=1.
- Solve: k=101.
- Sanity check: each probability (0.2,0.4,0.3,0.1) is between 0 and 1, so this is a valid distribution.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to include all four terms in the sum.
- Not checking that the resulting probabilities are all non-negative and ≤1.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 101.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.The range of a random variable X is {0,1,2}. If P(X=0)=3C3, P(X=1)=4C−10C2 and P(X=2)=5C−1, then the value of C is (A) 32 (B) 31 (C) 35 (D) 34
›Reveal solutionSolution
The three probabilities must add to 1; substituting each option, only C=31 satisfies the cubic AND keeps every probability in [0,1].
Concept and Intuition
For any discrete random variable, the probabilities over its whole range must sum to exactly 1. Writing that sum-to-1 condition down turns the problem into solving a polynomial equation in C — but since C is a probability parameter, we must also sanity-check that the resulting individual probabilities are all non-negative and at most 1 (a root of the polynomial that fails this check would be spurious/extraneous for a genuine probability distribution).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Sum-to-one condition: P(X=0)+P(X=1)+P(X=2)=1 3C3+(4C−10C2)+(5C−1)=1.
- Simplify: 3C3−10C2+9C−1=1⇒3C3−10C2+9C−2=0.
- Try the given options as roots. C=31: 3⋅271−10⋅91+9⋅31−2=91−910+3−2=−1+1=0. This works.
- Verify the resulting probabilities are valid: P(X=0)=91, P(X=1)=34−910=912−10=92, P(X=2)=35−1=32. Sum =91+92+96=1 ✓, and each lies in [0,1].
- So C=31 is the consistent answer.
Common Mistakes
- Accepting a root of the cubic without checking that each individual probability stays within [0,1] (a cubic can have roots that make some P(X=i) negative or exceed 1, which must be rejected).
- Arithmetic slips combining the −10C2 and +9C terms when simplifying the sum-to-one equation.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 31.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.A, B, C are three horses participating in a race. The Probability of horse A to win the race is twice that of horse B and probability of horse B to win is twice that of horse C. Then the probabilities of horses A, B and C to win the race are respectively (A) 74,72,71 (B) 61,62,65 (C) 41,21,71 (D) 74,73,71
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a simple ratio/probability partition problem: express all three probabilities as multiples of the smallest one and use that they sum to 1.
Concept and Intuition
When probabilities of mutually exclusive, exhaustive events are given in a chain of ratios, express everything as a multiple of the smallest and normalize using the fact that all probabilities must add to 1.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let P(C)=x.
- P(B)=2P(C)=2x.
- P(A)=2P(B)=4x.
- Since exactly one of A, B, C wins, P(A)+P(B)+P(C)=1⇒4x+2x+x=7x=1⇒x=71.
- So P(A)=74, P(B)=72, P(C)=71.
Common Mistakes
- Reversing the ratio (thinking P(A) is half of P(B) instead of twice).
- Forgetting that the three probabilities must sum to 1 exactly.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 74,72,71.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-FN1 markMCQQ.If S be the sample space of a random experiment ξ and P be a probability function defined on the power set P(S) of S, then which one of the following is not satisfied by P?(i) P(ϕ)=0(ii) If Ec is the complementary event of E, then P(Ec)=1−P(E)(iii) 0≤P(E)≤1, ∀E⊆S(iv) If E1⊆E2 then P(E2)≤P(E1) (A)(iii) (B)(iv) (C)(ii) (D) (i)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Three of the four listed statements are genuine probability axioms/consequences; (iv) reverses the correct monotonicity direction, so it is the one that is NOT satisfied.
Concept and Intuition
Probability is monotonic with respect to subset inclusion: a smaller (more restrictive) event can never be more likely than a larger event that contains it. If E1⊆E2, every outcome favouring E1 also favours E2, so P(E1)≤P(E2).
Step-by-Step Solution
- (i) P(ϕ)=0 — a standard axiom, true.
- (ii) P(Ec)=1−P(E) — follows since E and Ec partition S, true.
- (iii) 0≤P(E)≤1 for every E⊆S — the basic probability axiom, true.
- (iv) claims "E1⊆E2⇒P(E2)≤P(E1)" — this has the inequality backwards; the correct statement is P(E1)≤P(E2). So (iv) is false in general, hence not satisfied by P.
Common Mistakes
- Misreading the direction of the inclusion/inequality and picking (iii) or (ii) instead, which are both correctly stated axioms.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — (iv).
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-AN1 markMCQQ.Two dice are rolled. Then, the probability that the total score is a prime number is (A) 1/16 (B) 5/12 (C) 1/2 (D) 7/9
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests enumerating the number of ways to get each possible sum with two dice, restricted to prime sums, over the 36 equally-likely outcomes. Answer: 5/12.
Concept and Intuition
With two fair six-sided dice, there are 6×6=36 equally likely ordered outcomes. Each possible total from 2 to 12 has a known number of ways it can occur (a classic triangular-then-decreasing pattern: 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3,2,1 for sums 2 through 12). We simply sum the counts corresponding to prime totals.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total outcomes when rolling two dice: 6×6=36.
- Number of ways to get each sum: sum=2→1 way, 3→2, 4→3, 5→4, 6→5, 7→6, 8→5, 9→4, 10→3, 11→2, 12→1.
- Identify which sums from 2 to 12 are prime: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 (4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 are composite; 1 is not a possible sum here anyway).
- Sum the corresponding counts: for sum 2: 1 way; sum 3: 2 ways; sum 5: 4 ways; sum 7: 6 ways; sum 11: 2 ways. Total favorable =1+2+4+6+2=15.
- Probability =3615=125 (dividing numerator and denominator by 3).
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting that 1 is not prime, and mistakenly not including 2 as prime (2 IS prime, and it's the smallest possible sum, achieved by (1,1)).
- Missing one of the prime sums (like 11) or mis-remembering the count-per-sum table.
- Forgetting to reduce the fraction 15/36 to lowest terms.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 5/12.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-AN1 markMCQQ.The range of a random variable X is {1,2,3,...} and P(X=x)=x!Cx, for x=1,2,3,.... Then the value of C is (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) ln(2) (where ln denotes the natural log) (D) ln(3) (where ln denotes the natural log)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Requiring the probabilities to sum to 1 over x=1,2,3,… forces eC=2, so C=ln2.
Concept and Intuition
Any valid probability mass function must have its probabilities sum to exactly 1 over its whole range. Recognizing ∑x=0∞x!Cx=eC as the Taylor series of eC lets us convert the normalization condition into a simple exponential equation.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Since X takes values 1,2,3,…, normalization requires x=1∑∞P(X=x)=1, i.e. x=1∑∞x!Cx=1.
- Recall the Taylor series eC=x=0∑∞x!Cx=1+x=1∑∞x!Cx.
- So x=1∑∞x!Cx=eC−1.
- Set this equal to 1: eC−1=1⇒eC=2.
- Taking natural log of both sides: C=log2.
- Check validity: log2≈0.693>0, so each P(X=x)=x!Cx>0 as required for a probability.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to subtract the x=0 term (=1) when relating the sum starting at x=1 to the full exponential series, which would incorrectly give C=ln1=0.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — log(2) (where log denotes the natural log).
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-FN1 markMCQQ.Events A,B,C are mutually exclusive events such that P(A)=33x+1,P(B)=41−x and P(C)=21−2x. The set of possible values of x are in the interval (A) [31,21] (B) [31,32] (C) [31,313] (D) [0,1]
›Reveal solutionSolution
Every probability expression must be a valid probability (0 to 1), and mutual exclusivity forces the sum of the three to be at most 1 — intersecting all these constraints gives the answer.
Concept and Intuition
For probabilities to make sense, 0≤P(A),P(B),P(C)≤1. Mutual exclusivity means P(A∪B∪C)=P(A)+P(B)+P(C)≤1 (it could be less than 1 if there's a residual sample-space probability outside all three). All these inequalities on x must hold simultaneously.
Step-by-Step Solution
- 0≤33x+1≤1⇒−1≤3x≤2⇒−31≤x≤32.
- 0≤41−x≤1⇒−3≤x≤1.
- 0≤21−2x≤1⇒−21≤x≤21.
- Sum condition: 33x+1+41−x+21−2x≤1. Over a common denominator 12: 124(3x+1)+3(1−x)+6(1−2x)≤1⇒12−3x+13≤1⇒−3x≤−1⇒x≥31.
- Intersecting all four: x≥31 (from step 4), x≤21 (from step 3, the tightest upper bound), and the other bounds are looser. So x∈[31,21].
Common Mistakes
- Only checking the individual [0,1] bounds and forgetting the sum-at-most-1 condition (or vice versa) — both are needed to pin down the interval.
- Arithmetic slips combining the three fractions over a common denominator.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — [31,21].
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-AN1 markMCQQ.Let S be the set of all quadratic equations of the form x2+bx+c=0 where b,c∈{1,2,3,4,5,6}. If an equation is selected at random from S, then the probability that the equation has real roots is ________ (A) 129 (B) 369 (C) 3619 (D) 367
›Reveal solutionSolution
Count (b,c) pairs satisfying the real-roots discriminant condition out of all 36 equally likely pairs. Answer: (C).
Concept and Intuition
x2+bx+c=0 has real roots exactly when the discriminant b2−4c≥0, i.e., c≤b2/4. Since b,c are each chosen uniformly from {1,2,3,4,5,6}, there are 6×6=36 equally likely pairs total.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For b=1: need c≤0.25 — no valid c (0 pairs).
- For b=2: need c≤1 — c=1 (1 pair).
- For b=3: need c≤2.25 — c=1,2 (2 pairs).
- For b=4: need c≤4 — c=1,2,3,4 (4 pairs).
- For b=5: need c≤6.25 — all c=1,…,6 qualify (6 pairs).
- For b=6: need c≤9 — all c=1,…,6 qualify (6 pairs).
- Total favorable pairs =0+1+2+4+6+6=19.
- Probability =3619.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the discriminant must be ≥0 (not >0), which would wrongly exclude the boundary case b2=4c.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 3619.
ANSWER: C
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.