Q.Prove that the logarithmic function is increasing on (0,∞).
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Increasing Function Test
The Intuition: What Does "Increasing" Really Mean?
Imagine walking along the graph of a function from left to right. If the function is increasing, then as you step right (increasing x), you always move upward — your height f(x) never drops. You might stay flat briefly, but you never go down.
That's the visual idea. But we need a precise way to check it without drawing the entire graph — that's the Increasing Function Test, which uses the derivative to tell you where a function is rising.
A function f is increasing on an interval if, for any two points x1<x2 in it, f(x1)≤f(x2). With strict inequality (<), it's strictly increasing.
The Core Idea: Derivative as a Slope Detector
The derivative f′(x) gives the slope of the tangent line — the instantaneous rate of change. Positive slope means the function is rising at that instant; negative means falling. So the natural question: if the derivative is positive everywhere on an interval, does that guarantee the function is increasing on that whole interval? The answer is yes — and that's the Increasing Function Test.
The Precise Statement
Increasing Function Test
Let f be continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b).
- If f′(x)>0 for every x in (a,b), then f is strictly increasing on [a,b].
- If f′(x)≥0 for every x in (a,b), then f is increasing (non-decreasing) on [a,b].
The conditions "continuous on the closed interval" and "differentiable on the open interval" ensure there are no jumps or corners that could break the logic.
Why Does This Work? (A Quick Proof Sketch)
The proof relies on the Mean Value Theorem. For x1<x2 in [a,b], there exists some c between them such that:
f(x2)−f(x1)=f′(c)(x2−x1)
Since x2−x1>0, if f′(c)>0 the right-hand side is positive, so f(x2)>f(x1). This holds for any pair x1<x2 — exactly the definition of strictly increasing.
The converse is not true. A function can be strictly increasing even if its derivative is zero at some isolated points. Example: f(x)=x3 is strictly increasing everywhere, but f′(0)=0. The test gives a sufficient condition, not a necessary one.
How to Use It in Practice
- Compute f′(x).
- Solve f′(x)>0 — the solution intervals tell you where f is strictly increasing.
- Check endpoints if needed. …
The key idea is that the derivative of logax is positive for a>1, which directly implies monotonic increase.
Step 1: Consider the logarithmic function f(x)=logax with base a>1, defined for x>0.
Step 2: Differentiate: f′(x)=xlna1.
Step 3: Since x>0 and lna>0 (because a>1), the derivative f′(x)>0 for all x∈(0,∞). …
The logarithmic function f(x)=logax (with a>1) is increasing on (0,∞) because for any x1<x2, the monotonicity of the exponential function implies logax1<logax2. The key is that the exponential function ax is strictly increasing, and the logarithm is its inverse.
Why This Works: The Concept of Monotonicity
A function is increasing on an interval if, whenever you take two points x1<x2, the function values satisfy f(x1)<f(x2). For the logarithm f(x)=logax (with base a>1), we need to show that a larger input always gives a larger output.
The cleanest way to prove this is to use the fact that the logarithm is the inverse of the exponential function g(x)=ax. And we already know that ax is strictly increasing when a>1 — if you raise a bigger exponent, you get a bigger result. Since inverses of strictly increasing functions are also strictly increasing, the logarithm inherits this property.
But let's make this rigorous without assuming the inverse property.
Step-by-Step Proof
1. Set up what we need to prove.
Take any two positive numbers x1 and x2 such that 0<x1<x2. We must show:
logax1<logax2
2. Use the definition of the logarithm.
Let y1=logax1 and y2=logax2. By definition, this means:
ay1=x1anday2=x2
3. Translate the inequality into exponents.
We know x1<x2, so:
ay1<ay2
4. Apply the monotonicity of the exponential.
The function h(t)=at (with a>1) is strictly increasing. This means:
ay1<ay2impliesy1<y2
Why is at strictly increasing? For a>1, if t1<t2, then at2=at1⋅at2−t1, and since at2−t1>1, we get at2>at1. This is a fundamental property of exponential functions with base greater than 1.
5. Translate back to logarithms.
Since y1=logax1 and y2=logax2, the inequality y1<y2 becomes:
logax1<logax2
6. Conclude. …
Method: Proving Strict Monotonicity via the Sign of the Derivative
This method applies whenever you must prove (not just locate) that a function is increasing or decreasing on a stated interval, especially when the function is built from a known family such as logax or ax and a condition on a parameter (like the base a) is what makes the proof work.
Steps
Step 1: Write down the domain and the derivative test you will use.
Note any domain restriction (here x>0, since logax needs a positive argument), and recall: if f′(x)>0 for every x in the interval, f is strictly increasing there.
Step 2: Differentiate using the standard rule for the function's family, keeping any parameter symbolic.
dxdlogax=xlna1
Do not substitute a specific base — keep a as a symbol so the proof covers the general statement asked for.
Step 3: Determine the sign of every factor in the derivative using the restrictions given. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Forgetting the base restriction a>1.
Why it's wrong: the sign of lna flips for 0<a<1, which would make f′(x)<0 and the function decreasing instead. Correct approach: always state explicitly that the proof depends on a>1; without it, the increasing conclusion doesn't hold.
Mistake 2: Differentiating logax as if it were lnx.
Why it's wrong: dropping the lna factor gives f′(x)=1/x, which is only valid for the natural logarithm (a=e), not a general base. Correct approach: use the change-of-base derivative xlna1 and only simplify to 1/x when a=e is explicitly given. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.Which one of the following functions is monotonically increasing in its domain? (A) f(x)=log(1+x)−x+2x2 (B) g(x)=2Tan−1x−x−1 (C) h(x)=4cosx+x (D) u(x)=log(1+x)−x+1x
›Reveal solutionSolution
A function is monotonically increasing on its domain exactly when its derivative is ≥0 throughout that domain. Testing all four, only option (A)'s derivative stays non-negative everywhere it's defined.
Concept and Intuition
To check monotonicity, differentiate each candidate and determine the sign of the derivative across the entire stated domain — not just at a few sample points. A function can look "mostly increasing" but fail at some sub-interval, which disqualifies it.
Step-by-Step Solution
(A) f(x)=log(1+x)−x+2x2, domain x>−1.
f′(x)=1+x1−1+x=1+x1−(1+x)+x(1+x)=1+x1−1−x+x+x2=1+xx2
Since x>−1⇒1+x>0, and x2≥0 always, f′(x)≥0 throughout the domain (zero only at the single point x=0). So f is monotonically (non-strictly, but genuinely) increasing on its whole domain.
(B) g(x)=2tan−1x−x−1.
g′(x)=1+x22−1=1+x22−(1+x2)=1+x21−x2
This is negative whenever ∣x∣>1, so g decreases for large ∣x∣ — not monotonic on all of R.
(C) h(x)=4cosx+x.
h′(x)=−4sinx+1
Whenever sinx>41 (which happens periodically), h′(x)<0 — not monotonic.
(D) u(x)=log(1+x)−x+1x, domain x>−1. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.The interval in which the curve represented by f(x)=2x+log(2+xx) is increasing is (A) (−∞,0) (B) (−2,∞) (C) (−∞,−2)∪(0,∞) (D) (−2,0)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The function's very domain is (−∞,−2)∪(0,∞), and its derivative simplifies to a manifestly non-negative expression there, so f is increasing on that whole domain.
Concept and Intuition
Before studying monotonicity, always nail down the domain first — a logarithm argument must be strictly positive. Then compute the derivative and factor it; a perfect-square numerator over a product denominator often reveals the sign cleanly without case-by-case sign charts.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Domain: 2+xx>0⟺x and x+2 have the same sign ⟺x>0 or x<−2. So domain =(−∞,−2)∪(0,∞).
- f′(x)=2+x1−x+21=2+x(x+2)(x+2)−x=2+x(x+2)2.
- Combine: f′(x)=x(x+2)2x(x+2)+2=x(x+2)2(x2+2x+1)=x(x+2)2(x+1)2.
- On x>0: x(x+2)>0, and (x+1)2≥0, so f′(x)≥0.
- On x<−2: both x<0 and x+2<0, so x(x+2)>0 again, and f′(x)≥0. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.The interval in which the function f(x)=Tan−1(sinx+cosx) is an increasing function, is (A) (0,2π) (B) (−2π,2π) (C) (−43π,4π) (D) (4π,2π)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since Tan−1 is a strictly increasing function everywhere, f
increases exactly where its argument sinx+cosx increases — i.e. where
cosx−sinx>0 — giving the interval (−43π,4π).
Concept and Intuition
Tan−1(u) is a monotonically increasing function of u for all real
u (its derivative 1+u21 is always positive). So a composition
Tan−1(g(x)) increases exactly where g(x) itself increases — we never
need to worry about the denominator 1+g(x)2 changing the sign of the
derivative; it only ever scales it.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let u=sinx+cosx, so f(x)=Tan−1u.
- f′(x)=1+u2u′=1+(sinx+cosx)2cosx−sinx.
- The denominator 1+u2≥1>0 always, so sign(f′(x))=sign(cosx−sinx).
- Write cosx−sinx=2cos(x+4π).
- f is increasing when cos(x+4π)>0, i.e. −2π<x+4π<2π, i.e. −43π<x<4π. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-FN1 markMCQQ.If the function f(x)=sinx−cos2x is defined on the interval [−π,π], then f is strictly increasing in the interval (A) (6−5π,6−π)∪(6−π,2π) (B) (2−π,6−π) (C) (6−5π,2π) (D) (6−5π,2−π)∪(6−π,2π)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Factoring f′(x)=cosx(1+2sinx) and doing a careful sign analysis over [−π,π] shows f is strictly increasing on (−65π,−2π)∪(−6π,2π).
Concept and Intuition
A function is strictly increasing exactly where its derivative is strictly positive. Since f′ here factors into two simple trig expressions, the problem reduces to tracking the signs of cosx and (1+2sinx) separately across the interval and multiplying the signs region by region.
Step-by-Step Solution
- f(x)=sinx−cos2x⇒f′(x)=cosx−2cosx(−sinx)=cosx+2sinxcosx=cosx(1+2sinx).
- Find zeros of each factor in [−π,π]:
- cosx=0 at x=−2π,2π.
- 1+2sinx=0⇒sinx=−21 at x=−65π,−6π.
- These four points split [−π,π] into five intervals: (−π,−65π), (−65π,−2π), (−2π,−6π), (−6π,2π), (2π,π).
- Test the sign of f′(x)=cosx(1+2sinx) in each:
- (−π,−65π): cosx<0, sinx near 0 so 1+2sinx>0 ⇒f′<0.
- (−65π,−2π): cosx<0, sinx<−21 so 1+2sinx<0 ⇒f′>0.
- (−2π,−6π): cosx>0, sinx<−21 so 1+2sinx<0 ⇒f′<0.
- (−6π,2π): cosx>0, sinx>−21 so 1+2sinx>0 ⇒f′>0. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.If f(x)=xex(1−x), x∈R, then f(x) is (A) increasing on [−21,1] (B) decreasing on R (C) increasing on R (D) decreasing on [−21,1]
›Reveal solutionSolution
The sign of f′(x) is governed by the quadratic factor 1+x−2x2, which is non-negative exactly on [−1/2,1]. Answer: f is increasing on [−21,1].
Concept and Intuition
A function is increasing on an interval where f′≥0. Since f(x)=xex(1−x) is a product of x and an exponential, the product rule brings down an extra polynomial factor from differentiating the exponent, and because e(⋅)>0 always, the entire sign behaviour of f′ reduces to studying that leftover quadratic factor.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write f(x)=xex−x2 (since x(1−x)=x−x2).
- Product rule: f′(x)=ex−x2+xex−x2(1−2x)=ex−x2[1+x(1−2x)]=ex−x2(1+x−2x2).
- Since ex−x2>0 for all real x, the sign of f′(x) equals the sign of q(x)=1+x−2x2=−(2x2−x−1)=−(2x+1)(x−1).
- 2x2−x−1=0 at x=41±3, i.e. x=1 or x=−21. This upward parabola is ≤0 between its roots, so 2x2−x−1≤0 for x∈[−21,1], hence q(x)=−(2x2−x−1)≥0 there. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.The set of all real values of 'a' such that the real valued function f(x)=x3+2ax2+3(a+1)x+5 is strictly increasing in its entire domain is (A) (−∞,−43)∪(3,∞) (B) (−43,3) (C) (1,3) (D) (−∞,1)∪(3,∞)
›Reveal solutionSolution
A cubic is strictly increasing on all of R exactly when its derivative (a quadratic with positive leading coefficient) never goes negative, i.e. has non-positive discriminant. This gives a∈(−43,3).
Concept and Intuition
f is strictly increasing everywhere iff f′(x)≥0 for all x (with equality only at isolated points). For a quadratic f′(x)=3x2+4ax+3(a+1) with positive leading coefficient, this non-negativity for all x is equivalent to the discriminant being ≤0 — otherwise the parabola would dip below the x-axis somewhere.
Step-by-Step Solution
- f(x)=x3+2ax2+3(a+1)x+5⇒f′(x)=3x2+4ax+3(a+1).
- Require discriminant of f′ ≤0: (4a)2−4(3)(3(a+1))≤0⇒16a2−36a−36≤0.
- Divide by 4: 4a2−9a−9≤0.
- Solve 4a2−9a−9=0: a=89±81+144=89±15, giving a=3 or a=−43. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.The interval containing all the real values of x such that the real valued function f(x)=x+x1 is strictly increasing is (A) (1,∞) (B) (0,1) (C) (−∞,0)∪(1,∞) (D) (−∞,0)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Differentiate and check the sign on the natural domain x>0; f strictly increases on (1,∞).
Concept and Intuition
A function is strictly increasing wherever its derivative is (strictly) positive. Since x1 requires x>0, the domain of f is restricted to positive reals from the start — there's no negative-x branch to worry about.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Domain: x needs x≥0 and x1 needs x>0, so the domain is (0,∞).
- f′(x)=2x1−21x−3/2=2x1(1−x1)=2x1⋅xx−1=2x3/2x−1.
- On (0,∞), 2x3/2>0 always, so the sign of f′(x) matches the sign of (x−1). …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-FN1 markMCQQ.The function f(x)=x2+x54 (A) is increasing and has minimum value 27 in the interval (0,∞) (B) is decreasing and has neither maximum nor minimum in the interval (−∞,0) (C) has maximum value 27 in the interval (−∞,∞) (D) is increasing and has neither maximum nor minimum values in the interval (−∞,∞)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Sign-analysis of f′(x)=2x−54/x2 shows f is strictly decreasing throughout (−∞,0) with no turning point there (the only critical point x=3 lies in (0,∞)), so option (B) is the true statement.
Concept and Intuition
A function is monotonic on an interval exactly when its derivative keeps one sign throughout that interval; local extrema only occur where the derivative is zero (or undefined) and changes sign. Checking (−∞,0) and (0,∞) separately (since f isn't even defined at x=0) settles all four options at once.
Step-by-Step Solution
- f(x)=x2+x54⇒f′(x)=2x−x254.
- Critical points: f′(x)=0⇒2x=x254⇒2x3=54⇒x3=27⇒x=3 (the only real root).
- On (0,∞): for 0<x<3, e.g. x=1: f′(1)=2−54=−52<0; for x>3, e.g. x=4: f′(4)=8−54/16>0. So f decreases on (0,3) then increases on (3,∞) — a genuine local minimum at x=3, value f(3)=9+18=27, but f is not monotonically increasing throughout (0,∞) — rules out (A).
- On (−∞,0): for any x<0, 2x<0 and −54/x2<0 (since x2>0 always makes −54/x2 negative) — so f′(x)<0 for every x<0. Thus f is strictly decreasing on all of (−∞,0), with no sign change, hence no interior local max or min. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-AN1 markMCQQ.In the interval (7,∞), f(x)=∣x−5∣+2∣x−7∣ is (A) increasing function (B) decreasing function (C) constant function (D) attains maximum value
›Reveal solutionSolution
On the interval (7,∞) both absolute-value expressions can be opened without a sign flip, reducing f(x) to the simple linear function 3x−19, which is clearly increasing.
Concept and Intuition
Absolute value functions are piecewise linear, with "kinks" only at the points where the inner expression changes sign (here at x=5 and x=7). To analyze behaviour on (7,∞) we just need to know the sign of each inner expression throughout that interval — beyond both kink points, both expressions are positive, so the absolute values open up with a plain + sign.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For x>7: since x>7>5, we have x−5>0 and x−7>0.
- So ∣x−5∣=x−5 and ∣x−7∣=x−7 on this interval.
- f(x)=(x−5)+2(x−7)=x−5+2x−14=3x−19.
- f′(x)=3>0 for all x in (7,∞), so f is strictly increasing there.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-FN1 markMCQQ.y=x3−ax2+48x+7 is an increasing function for all real values of x, then a lies in the interval (A) (−14,14) (B) (−12,12) (C) (−16,16) (D) (−21,−21)
›Reveal solutionSolution
A cubic is increasing everywhere exactly when its derivative (an upward parabola) never goes negative — that discriminant condition gives a∈(−12,12).
Concept and Intuition
y=x3−ax2+48x+7 increases everywhere iff y′(x)≥0 for every real x. Since y′=3x2−2ax+48 is an upward-opening parabola (positive leading coefficient), it stays ≥0 for all x exactly when its discriminant is ≤0 (no real roots, or a repeated root, so it never dips below zero).
Step-by-Step Solution
- y′=3x2−2ax+48.
- Require y′≥0 ∀x: discriminant ≤0: (−2a)2−4(3)(48)≤0.
- 4a2−576≤0⇒a2≤144⇒−12≤a≤12.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.If f′′(x) is a positive function for all x∈R, f′(3)=0 and g(x)=f(tan2(x)−2tan(x)+4) for 0<x<2π, then the interval in which g(x) is increasing is ______. (A) (6π,3π) (B) (0,4π) (C) (0,3π) (D) (4π,2π)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Complete the square in u to see u≥3 always (so f′(u)≥0), then the sign of g′ is controlled entirely by u′(x), which turns positive past x=π/4. Answer: (4π,2π).
Concept and Intuition
Since f′′>0, f′ is strictly increasing, and f′(3)=0 means f′(t)>0 for t>3 and f′(t)<0 for t<3. If we can show the inner function u(x) never goes below 3, then f′(u)≥0 everywhere and the composite's monotonicity is governed purely by u′(x)'s sign.
Step-by-Step Solution
- u(x)=tan2x−2tanx+4=(tanx−1)2+3, which is always ≥3, with equality iff tanx=1 i.e. x=π/4.
- So f′(u(x))≥0 for all x∈(0,π/2), with f′(u)=0 only exactly at x=π/4.
- g′(x)=f′(u(x))⋅u′(x), where u′(x)=2tanxsec2x−2sec2x=2sec2x(tanx−1).
- sec2x>0 always, so sign(u′(x))=sign(tanx−1): negative for x<π/4, positive for x>π/4. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-AN1 markMCQQ.If g(x)=61f(3x2−1)+21f(1−x2), ∀x∈R, where f′′(x)>0, ∀x∈R. Then g(x) is increasing in the interval ______ (A) (2−1,0)∪(21,∞) (B) (2−1,21) (C) (−1,0)∪(1,2) (D) (−∞,2−1)∪(21,∞)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This uses convexity of f (via f′′>0) to compare f′ at two different points without knowing f explicitly. The answer is (−21,0)∪(21,∞).
Concept and Intuition
Because f′′(x)>0 everywhere, f′ is a strictly increasing function. That means we never need to know f itself — we only need to compare the arguments 3x2−1 and 1−x2 to know which of f′(3x2−1), f′(1−x2) is larger, since a strictly increasing function preserves order.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Differentiate g(x)=61f(3x2−1)+21f(1−x2) using the chain rule:
g′(x)=61f′(3x2−1)(6x)+21f′(1−x2)(−2x)=xf′(3x2−1)−xf′(1−x2)
- So g′(x)=x[f′(3x2−1)−f′(1−x2)].
- Since f′′>0, f′ is strictly increasing, so f′(a)−f′(b) has the same sign as a−b. Here a−b=(3x2−1)−(1−x2)=4x2−2.
- So g′(x) has the same sign as x(4x2−2)=2x(2x2−1), i.e. the same sign as x(2x2−1). …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.